dcsimg
Image of Norway Pine
Creatures » » Plants » » Gymnosperms » » Pines »

Norway Pine

Pinus resinosa Aiton

Comments

provided by eFloras
Pinus resinosa was once the most important timber pine in the Great Lakes region.

Norway pine ( Pinus resinosa ) is the state tree of Minnesota.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA
bibliographic citation
Flora of North America Vol. 2 in eFloras.org, Missouri Botanical Garden. Accessed Nov 12, 2008.
source
Flora of North America @ eFloras.org
editor
Flora of North America Editorial Committee
project
eFloras.org
original
visit source
partner site
eFloras

Description

provided by eFloras
Trees to 37m; trunk to 1.5m diam., straight; crown narrowly rounded. Bark light red-brown, furrowed and cross-checked into irregularly rectangular, scaly plates. Branches spreading-ascending; twigs moderately slender (to 1cm thick), orange- to red-brown, aging darker brown, rough. Buds ovoid-acuminate, red-brown, to ca. 2cm, resinous; scale margins fringed. Leaves 2 per fascicle, straight or slightly twisted, brittle, breaking cleanly when bent, deep yellow-green, all surfaces with narrow stomatal bands, margins serrulate, apex short-conic, acute; sheath 1--2.5cm, base persistent. Pollen cones ellipsoid, ca. 15mm, dark purple. Seed cones maturing and opening in 2 years, spreading, symmetric, ovoid before opening, broadly ovoid to nearly globose when open, 3.5--6cm, light red-brown, nearly sessile; apophyses slightly thickened, slightly raised, transversely low-keeled; umbo central, centrally depressed, unarmed. Seeds ovoid; body 3--5mm, brown; wing to 20mm. 2 n =24.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA
bibliographic citation
Flora of North America Vol. 2 in eFloras.org, Missouri Botanical Garden. Accessed Nov 12, 2008.
source
Flora of North America @ eFloras.org
editor
Flora of North America Editorial Committee
project
eFloras.org
original
visit source
partner site
eFloras

Habitat & Distribution

provided by eFloras
Sandy soils, eastern boreal forests; 200--800(--1300)m; Man., N.B., Nfld., N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que.; Conn., Ill., Maine, Mass., Mich., Minn., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Pa., Vt., W.Va., Wis.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA
bibliographic citation
Flora of North America Vol. 2 in eFloras.org, Missouri Botanical Garden. Accessed Nov 12, 2008.
source
Flora of North America @ eFloras.org
editor
Flora of North America Editorial Committee
project
eFloras.org
original
visit source
partner site
eFloras

Broad-scale Impacts of Fire

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: backfire, crown fire, duff, fireline intensity, forest, fuel, hardwood, headfire, high-severity fire, moderate-severity fire, prescribed fire, seed, series, severity, tree, wildfire

Cambial injury:
Red pines can survive substantial cambial injury from fire [230,288]. In 1914 a low- to
moderate-severity fire at Chalk River, Ontario, caused over 50%
cambium kill 30-year-old red pines. However, approximately 60 years later a majority of the
trees had survived the fire, only suffering basal scarring [44].

Crown scorch:
Mature red pines
can survive substantial crown scorch [189]. On 31 May and 15 June, Methven [189]
carried out prescribed burns in 2 mature red pine stands to assess the effect of
crown scorch. Red pines in stand 1 (May burn) ranged in diameter from 9 to 17
inches (20-43 cm), and trees in stand 2 (June burn) averaged 5 to 15 inches
(10-38 cm). An "appreciable" amount of crown scorch occurred, particularly in
stand 2, due to either ignition pattern or localized fuel concentrations. In
June of the following year, mortality of red pine due to crown scorch was
measured. Red pine mortality began with 46% to 50% crown scorch, reached 50%
mortality with 81% to 85% scorch, and 100% mortality occurred with 96% to 100%
crown scorch. The researcher did not distinguish the rate of mortality by
diameter class, since 96% of the trees in the study had a DBH of 9 inches (20
cm) or greater [189]. However, a previous study found higher mortality associated with
crown scorch in trees with DBH less than 9 inches (20 cm) [285].

Van Wagner [285]
conducted a series of prescribed burns in
80-year-old red pine-eastern white pine stands in eastern Ontario and found that
red pine survived crown scorch and stem charring. The burn sites were on nearly
level sand and gravel deposits along the Petawawa River.
Fires were conducted on 3 plots (I-III) with 4 series (1-4) of burns on each
plot. Plot II-1 and plot III-1 were burned in both 1959 and 1960 [285].

Burning conditions and dates for
prescribed burns in a red pine-eastern white pine community [285]
Plot series
Date of fires

Fire weather


Moisture content of fuels

(% oven-dried weight)


Rate of spread

(feet/minute)


Wind speed near ground

(mph)

Relative humidity

(%)

Top duff layer Full duff layer With wind Against wind
1 24-25 June 1959 2.4 36 18 68 1.2 0.7
2 31 May 1960 1.9 53 19 41 1.1 0.8
3 10-11 August 1960 2.0 38 16 32 1.5 0.8
4 19 August 1960 2.7 30 10 14 4.7 1.2

Headfire intensity (BTU/second/foot) of front and rate of spread
(feet/minute) were measured on all sites except III-4, which was disturbed and
could not be burned [285].

Headfire
intensity and rate of spread of 11 fires in a red pine-eastern white
pine community [285]
Plot/series Headfire intensity of front (BTU/sec/ft) Rate of spread (ft/min)
I-1 25 ND*
I-2 25 0.9
I-3 96 1.6
I-4 370 5.3
II-1 40 ND
II-2 40 1.5
II-3 79 1.9
II-4 216 4.1
III-1 20 ND
III-2 20 0.8
III-3 30 1.1

*No data

One year following the fires, crown damage and pine mortality were
evaluated. Damage to pines was negligible on burned sites with fireline
intensity less than 41 BTU/sec./ft. Pine damage
on the remaining plots was related to fireline intensity [285].

Comparison of headfire intensity and
damage to red and eastern white pines on the 4 plots burned with the highest severity [285]
Plot/series Headfire intensity of front
(BTU/sec./ft.) Average height of scorch line (feet) Average % of crown scorch (pines 6 inches DBH or greater) Average maximum stem height charred (feet) Average minimum stem height charred (feet)
I-3 96 21 42 3.3 1.4
I-4 370 55+ 72 7.0 3.8
II-3 79 15 0.1 2.8 0.8
II-4 216 42 38 7.0 3.2


Crown damage and first-year mortality
following the 1960 fires [285]
Crown scorch (%) Number of pines % dead after 1 year
95-100 65* 100
80-94 21 76
40-79 38 24
5-39 34 15
0-4 "many" 0

*Diameter range in the group was 2 to 12 inches (5-30 cm).

Following a 12 April 1966 fire in a 47-year-old red
pine plantation in Minnesota, tree survival was high even in trees with over 50% crown scorch [269].

Effect of crown scorching on the survival of
red pine after an April 1966 fire [269]
Approximate percent of

needles killed
Trees

observed
Percent of trees still alive on 5 dates
8 June 1966 9 July 1966 18 October 1966 20 June 1967 9 October 1967
95-100% 42 100 79 71 64 60
75-95% 36 100 100 93 86 86
50-75% 58 100 100 97 92 92
5-20% 60 100 100 100 95 95

For further information on this study, see Seedling establishment following fire and the Research Project Summary
of Van Wagner's [285] study.

Low-severity fires:
In a red pine-eastern white pine plantation in
Michigan's southwestern lower peninsula, Neumann and Dickmann [198] found that
single (10 May 1991) and repeated (10 May 1991 and 10 May 1993) low-severity
burning did not affect the red pine overstory. However, single and repeated
burning caused a significant decrease in pine and hardwood saplings and large
seedlings (P=0.05). Further, in 1994, pine seedlings were fewer on burned
than unburned sites. For more information, see the Research Project Summary
on this study.

Mortality following high-severity fires:
In the following studies red pine mortality occurred following high-severity fires.
In mid-May 1971 a high-severity fire burned almost 15,000
acres (6,100 ha) in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. The fire completely scorched
and killed many of the mature red pine and eastern
white pine. The first summer after the fire no red pine or eastern
white pine seedlings established, which is to be expected since seed shedding does
not occur until fall. By the end of the summer, understory vegetation in the red
pine-eastern white pine community was dominated by pin cherry (Prunus
pensylvanica) [33].

A high-severity August 1995 fire on the
southeast side of Quetico Provincial Park, Ontario, caused mortality of red
pines [177]. The crown fire swept through 200- to 300-year-old red pine stands with such intensity (up to 40,000 kW/m)
that in places, the organic soil layer was totally consumed, exposing red pine
roots. Tree mortality was near 100% on the
ridges of high-severity burn sites, with surviving trees generally found near
the edges of lakes or rivers [177]. For further information on the study, see Seedling establishment following fire.

Root sensitivity to heat:
While severe fires can cause root mortality [72,134], a single, low-severity prescribed fire
did not cause red pine fine root mortality at the W. K.
Kellogg Experimental Forest near Augusta, Michigan [322]. The
backfire was conducted during June in a stand of red pine approximately
50 years old and averaging 65 feet (19.8 m) tall. During the fire, temperatures
reached at least 160 °F (73 °C) for about
12 minutes at the soil surface. At 0.8 inch (2 cm) and 2 inches (6 cm) below the soil surface, temperatures remained
relatively constant at approximately 57 °F
(14 °C) and 61 °F (16 °C), respectively, for 40
minutes. At the site, red pine fine roots to a depth of 4 inches (10 cm)
represented 11.8% of the total forest floor root
mass. The minimum temperature required to cause "substantial rapid root mortality" in red pine
is 127 °F (52.5 °C), with temperatures of 140
°F (60 °C) or higher causing complete fine root mortality [322].

Seedling needle scorch:
Red pine seedlings can survive substantial needle scorch [189]. In an August
laboratory experiment, 3-year-old red pine seedlings were subjected to
temperatures starting at 77 °F (25 °C), increasing
incrementally to 200 °F (100 °C), and returning to approximately 95 °F (35 °C). Maximum temperatures
were attained within 2 minutes, with the complete cycle occurring in 4 minutes.
Red pine needle-tip scorch first appeared at around 100 °F (50 °C). Needle
scorch rose rapidly from 20% to 70% at 140 °F (60 °C).
Following heat treatments, the red pine seedlings were planted outside and the
effect of needle scorch was measured in June of the following year. Red pine
seedlings with up to 90% needle scorch had mortality of 10% to 20%. Significant mortality did not happen until
approximately 95% of the needles were scorched, which occurred at 180 °F (80
°C) [189].

Stem charring:
Two wildfires (severity not described) in
Newfoundland, 1 in the spring of 1997 (SL1) and the other in the summer of 1979
(Grant's Pit), caused substantially greater red pine mortality in mixed stands
(25-50% black spruce and 50-75% red pine) than in pure red pine stands [227]. Following
the 2 fires, Roberts and Mallik [227] measured tree
survival rates, stem char heights, and tree heights in pure and mixed stands
on flat, downslope, and upslope positions. Survival was consistently low in
mixed stands and consistently high in pure red pine stands. Average char height
was not consistently related to survival. Relationship between slope position
and survival was not clear [227].

Effects of a spring and summer wildfire
on the structure of a pure red pine and mixed stand at 3 topographic
locations [227]


Topographic

position

SL1 (spring 1977 fire)


Grant's Pit (summer 1979 fire)


Survival (%) Stem char height
(m (SD)) Average tree height
(m (SD)) Survival (%) Stem char height
(m (SD)) Average tree height
(m (SD))
Pure red pine stands
Flat 95 0.9a (SD  0.4) 11.4 (SD  1.3) 90 4.3a (SD  0.9) 15.8 (SD  1.2)
Downslope 90 1.3a (SD  0.5) 11.4 (SD  1.3) 90 8.6b (SD  2.1) 15.8 (SD  1.2)
Upslope 75 7.9b (SD  0.9) 11.4 (SD  1.3) 90 12.4c (SD  2.3) 15.8 (SD  1.2)
Mixed stands
Flat 20 9.7a (SD  2.1) 11.4 (SD  1.3) 35 12.0a (SD  2.1) 15.8 (SD  1.2)
Downslope 20 7.4b (SD  0.9) 11.4 (SD  1.3) 35 11.5a (SD  2.1) 15.8 (SD  1.2)
Upslope 20 11.1c (SD  1.2) 11.4 (SD  1.3) 25 13.0a (SD  2.6) 15.8 (SD  1.2)
Mean char heights followed by
different letters in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05)
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Broad-scale Impacts of Plant Response to Fire

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: basal area, density, flame length, forest, frequency, fuel, fuel moisture, low-severity fire, prescribed fire, seed, severity, surface fire, tree

Seedling establishment following fire:
Both low- and high-severity fires can promote red pine
seedling establishment; however, chances for successful seedling establishment
are increased following high severity fires and in a good seed production year.

A late summer high-severity
fire in Quetico Park, Ontario, burned 440 acres (180 ha) of forest, including a
5-acre (2-ha) stand of mature red pine. Approximately 50% of the red pine stand
survived and provided seeds for eventual reestablishment.
Seedling establishment, which was described as "abundant", began at about
postfire year 6 when the ash layer was reduced on the shallow, sandy loam soil. The
majority of red pine establishment occurred in 2 pulses roughly 7 years apart, which coincides with the usual interval
between good seed crops [4].

Average number of red pine seedlings,
saplings, and seed-producing trees 13 and 19 years after fire at Quetico
Park, Ontario [4]
Years after fire Seedlings/acre Average age of seedlings (years) Average seedling height (feet) Saplings/acre Seed-producing trees/acre
13 526 7 2.0 6 35
19 284 8 2.0 130 24

More seedlings established on low-severity than
high-severity summer burned sites in northwestern Ontario. The low-severity August 1995 fire
at Kenny Lake occurred in a "poor" seed year, but resulted in red pine
seedling establishment. "Most" red pines survived, but all balsam fir trees were killed
at Kenny Lake. At the high-severity burn sites at Kawnipi Lake, there was almost
complete tree mortality. Seedling establishment was evaluated in the first
postfire year. Although 1995
was a described as a "poor" seed year, most red pines produced some cones [177].

Prefire live stems/ha and postfire seedlings/ha of red
pine high-severity and low-severity burn sites at Quetico
Provincial Park [177]


Study sites
Prefire
Postfire
Live stems/ha Seedlings/ha
High-severity fires
Kawnipi Lake site 1 81 0
Kawnipi Lake site 2 121 375
Kawnipi Lake site 3 59 0
Kawnipi Lake site 4 37 125
Low-severity fire
Kenny Lake 638 2,000

One full growing season
after the fires conducted by Van Wagner [285], which are discussed more fully above,
red pine and eastern white pine
seedlings were counted on the burned sites (seedling
counts were made 2 years after the fire on plot I-1). In general, pine seedlings
were greatest on sites where high-severity fires occurred and lower where low-severity fires occurred.
Sites that burned with the highest severity were I-3, I-4, II-3, and II-4.
Van Wagner also measured the amount of soil bared by the fires [285].

Pine regeneration and soil bared following burning of
11 sites [285]


Plot/series Number of red and eastern white pine seedlings Bared soil (%)
I-1* 2,380 ~10
I-2 No data <2
I-3 312 29
I-4 1,300 56
II-1 6,696 ~20
II-2 1,215 <2
II-3 7,310 23
II-4 3,410 35
III-1 1,520 ~20
III-2 1,120 <2
III-3 210 <2
*Seedlings counted 2 years
after fire in I-1 plot.

Eight years following a prescribed fire in a Connecticut forest dominated by
eastern white pine, black oak, white oak, and sweet birch, red pine stem density
significantly increased due to seedling establishment (P<0.01) [78].
The fire occurred during the final week of April 1985.
Fine fuel moisture was 28% in the morning and decreased to 18% by afternoon. Rate of spread was slow
(~1 m/min), and flame length was generally less than 10 inches (30 cm). Within
the site, part was "lightly" burned with approximately 40% of tree density and
30% of tree basal area eliminated, while the other part was severely burned,
reducing tree density 70% and basal area 60%. In postfire year 8, red pine stem
density and frequency on both the control site and lightly burned site with an
intact overstory was 0%, while stem density and frequency on the severely burned
site without an overstory were 460 stems/ha and 19%, respectively [78].

Root/shoot growth:
In the laboratory, red pine primary root and shoot growth was greater in heat-treated
organic matter than in unheated organic matter [180]. Red pine seed germination
varied among treatments. Organic matter was heat-treated for 30 minutes prior to red pine seed plantings.
Root and shoot measurements were taken 2 weeks following planting. As the
organic matter was subjected to high temperatures, pH increased [180].

Seed germination and seedling growth of
red pine in sand, unheated organic matter, and heated organic matter
[180]


Treatments
pH
Germination (%)

Length (mm)


Primary root Primary shoot
Unheated organic matter 3.0 96 3.19 260.30
200 °C slightly >3 80 10.31 224.35
400 °C 7.0 86 16.84 230.74
600 °C 8.0 94 22.20 290.79
800 °C 8.3 90 22.04 289.46

Resin:
Fifty-five days following a
surface fire on 8 May in a 44-year-old red pine forest near Colfax, Wisconsin, resin mass in red pines with scorched boles
was more than double that in unscorched
trees. Resin mass from boles of scorched trees was 0.68 g
compared to 0.29 g from boles of unscorched trees [171]. At Itasca
State Park, old-growth red pines charred by a spring prescribed fire to a mean
height of 15 feet (SD  11.5) (4.57 m, SD 
3.51)), with a range of 1.1 to 37.86 feet
(0.35-11.54 m), showed an increase in resin mass compared to unburned red pines. Among red pine burned, resin
mass increased linearly with height of charring [236].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Common Names

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
red pine

northern pine

Norway pine
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Conservation Status

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
Information on state- and province-level protection status of red pine in the United States
and Canada is available at NatureServe.


license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Description

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: fresh, tree

This description provides characteristics that may be relevant to fire ecology, and is not meant for
identification. Keys for identification are available (e.g., [52,80,89,96,267]).

Aboveground description:
Red pine is a long-lived (200-400 years), coniferous tree [22,57,89,231,252].
It grows in pure, even-aged stands and uneven-aged mixed stands primarily with
eastern white pine, jack pine, and/or quaking aspen [252,258]. Red pine has
an average height of 75 feet (23 m), but under ideal conditions may grow as tall
as 200 feet (50 m) [96,107,252,266,267]. It has a straight trunk with little
taper, few branches occurring below the canopy [231,252], and an average DBH of
10 to 20 inches (30-60 cm) [96,231,252,267], with a maximum reported DBH of 59.8
inches (152 cm) [266]. The bark is furrowed and cross-checked into irregular
rectangular, scaly plates up to 2 inches (6 cm) thick [96,266]. Details on the thermophysical
properties of red pine bark are available in Reifsnyder and others [225].


Red pine has 2 straight to slightly twisted, flexible, slender, sharp-pointed
needles/fascicle, measuring 4 to 6.7 inches (9-17 cm) long
[80,89,96,107,252,267]. The majority of red pine needles live for 3 years, but
some may persist for as long as 6 years [80,87,107,252,266]. Red pine cones are
produced near the tips of twigs [80] and are approximately 1.4 to 3 inches
(3.5-7 cm) long [80,89,96]. The middle third of the crown produces the greatest
number and heaviest cones [71,231]. The cones contain ovoid seeds 3 to 5 mm
across [96,107]. On Black Island in Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba, red pine cones
averaged 1.91 × 1.08 inches (48.61 × 27.47 mm) long, with a mean fresh mass of about
0.49 ounce (13.88 g). The mean number of seeds/cone was 53 [270].


Crown structure:
Red pine has a dense and symmetrical, generally
ovoid-shaped crown and upcurved branches with stout twigs up to 0.4 inch (1 cm)
thick [89,96,252]. One whorl of branches is produced
annually from lateral buds formed at the leading shoot. Occasionally a second
flush produces shoots in late summer, likely due to substantial rainfall after
a dry period. Foliage weight increases from the top downwards for the first few
whorls, remains constant for several more, and then diminishes towards the crown
base, with the mean weight at or slightly below the midpoint. Crowns are
enlarged by the annual extension of the main stem and branches. As red pine
ages, branch extension and height growth diminish [266].


Belowground description:
Red pine produces lateral roots with vertical sinker roots
that are moderately deep and wide-spreading [89,252,266].
It may also produce a taproot extending 0.39 to 10 feet (0.12-3 m) below ground [89,252,252,266].
Lateral roots radiate from the tree in a spoke-like fashion and remain
relatively close to the soil surface (4-18 inches (10-45 cm)) [266]. In a review, the
lateral roots of red pine were described as being as long as 36 feet (11 m) at a
site in Ontario. There were approximately a dozen main lateral roots/tree, and they reached their greatest length in 15 to
20 years [266]. Vertical sinker roots develop from lateral roots to depths of 8.9 to 20 feet (2.7-5.0 m) [47,252,266].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Distribution

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
Red pine occurs from Cape Breton Island,
Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, southern Quebec, and Maine
westward to central Ontario and southeastern Manitoba and southward to
Minnesota, Michigan, northern Pennsylvania, northern New Jersey, Connecticut,
and Massachusetts [34,52,80,89,96,107,146,157,231,301]. Red pine's
main distribution is centered around the Great Lakes and the St Lawrence River in a band
approximately 1,500 miles (2,400 km) long and 500 miles (800 km) wide [46,231,288]. It grows
locally in northern Illinois, eastern West Virginia, and Newfoundland [31,195,231,267]. The US Geological Survey
provides a distributional map of red pine.
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Fire Ecology

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: cohort, cover, fire cycle, fire exclusion, fire frequency, fire regime, fire-free interval, fire-return interval, forest, frequency, fuel, hardwood, ladder fuels, low-severity fire, mean fire-return interval, mesic, natural, natural fire rotation, potential natural vegetation, potential natural vegetation group, restoration, seed, seed tree, severity, shrub, surface fire, swamp, tree, woodland, xeric

Fire adaptations:
Red pine depends upon fire for regeneration [28,94,127,128,129,130]
and has numerous fire adaptations.
Peaks in red pine regeneration generally occur in the years following fire
[28,89], primarily from on-site seed sources. In forests of the
northeastern United States, red pine fire resistance is ranked third in
order behind pitch pine and chestnut oak (Quercus prinus) [257,262,263].

Bark: Red pine bark thickness is its most important
fire adaptation. At maturity (beginning at age 20-40), red pine's fire-resistant, thick bark helps protect it from
surface fires of low to moderate severity [4,46,51,94,95,125,126,141,147,288] and possibly high-severity fires [11].
By the time red pine produces seed, it is not generally killed by surface fires [56,57].
In Pennsylvania and the Great Lakes States,
maximum red pine bark thickness ranges from 5.0% to 5.2% of DBH [257]. Butson and others [46] claim that the unusually fire-resistant bark makes crown scorch the
greatest limitation to red pine survival during fire. Bergeron and
Gagnon [31] state "long-term maintenance of red
pine is promoted by fire because its thick bark effectively protects it against
most surface fires of light to moderate intensity, whereas its shade-tolerant
competitors are usually killed." Bark of young trees (<20-40 years old) is relatively
flammable, however [3,230].

Crown fires/scorch/structure:
Mature red pine have an elevated crown and are self-pruning [115,147,192], which helps protect
them from surface fires spreading into the crown [115,147,192,252]. Crown fires are much more
likely in young red pine stands (15-20 years of age), where crowns are closer to
the ground [3,129,130]. The nonconical shape of red pine crowns also limits
the rate of spread and crowning of fires. It generally takes windy, dry conditions for crowning to occur
[144].

Crown scorch kills red pine more often than stem damage [3], though
high intensity fires can cause
cambial injury [72,134]. While red pine can survive low- to moderate-severity surface fires,
severe surface fires can cause crown scorching [72,134]. Mortality begins at 46% to 50% crown scorch.
Two groups have published guidelines for predicting mortality from crown scorch:
the first states that there is a 50% probability of tree mortality if 81% to 85%
of the crown scorches [187], while the second states that most red pines die when more than 75% of the crown is scorched
[72,134]. Trees have a better chance of survival following crown scorch if scorch occurs
before bud flush [187]. A surface fire of less than 200
BTU/sec-ft will probably not scorch the crown of red pine, a surface fire of 500 BTU/sec-ft is
"on the edge of dangerous"
for the largest red pines, and a surface fire of 1,000 BTU/sec-ft is likely
to kill most red pines [288].

Regeneration following fire:
Red pine's only regeneration method following fire is by
seed from crown-stored cones or off-site sources [4,22,80,89,96,166,187,230,231,266].
However, red pine seeds are generally dispersed within a radius equal to the height of
the seed tree [4,252,266], with a maximum dispersal range from 900 to 1,000 feet
(275-300 m) [252] and a mean dispersal distance averaging about 40 feet (12 m) [231].
Thus, regeneration is most likely to occur from crown-stored seeds not
damaged by fire. Red pine requires 20 to 40 years between fires for successful recruitment
[55,57].

Resin:
Following fire wounding, red pines produce
a large amount of resin that fills the wounds [11,236,294]. It is hypothesized that this is an adaptation
to prevent the entrance of wood-destroying fungi and bark beetles. Verrall [294] found
few wood-decaying organisms in heavily-wounded red pines at Cloquet Forest Experiment Station,
Minnesota. The trees, approximately 110 years old, were wounded by fires in
1842, 1853, 1864, and 1894. Wounds extending one-eighth to one-fourth the
circumference at the base of the tree and 6 to 10 feet (2-3 m) up the stem were common.
Yet a large majority of trees were entirely free of decay [294].

FIRE REGIMES:
Substantial evidence suggests that a "natural" fire regime is necessary for the
maintenance and perpetuation of red pine stands [11,28,32,94,127,128,129,130].
Red pine generally occurs in even-aged stands
experiencing frequent understory fires and infrequent, stand-replacement fires
[2,23,258,259]. Fires not only reduce shrub vegetation that competes with red pine
seedlings, but also improve the seedbed by reducing forest floor depth
[9,94,95]. According to Heinselman [130], red pine has 2 distinct fire
regimes. The 1st fire regime occurs in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and western Ontario
in red pine and red pine-eastern white pine stands with little understory
development, almost no shade-tolerant conifers or hardwoods, and a xeric
climate. These forests probably had a history of periodic "light" surface fires
at 5- to 50-year intervals, plus high-severity fires at longer intervals that
resulted in a new cohort of pines [130]. In this literature review, a discussion of this red
pine fire regime theory is presented first, and Heinselman's 2nd fire regime
theory for red pine stands occurring from Michigan eastward is discussed second. Heinselman's
2nd fire regime theory is contradicted, in part, by other literature
[173,174,250]. This discussion is followed by
the effects of fire exclusion and climate change on red pine.

Xeric sites/red pine dominant:
In the western part of the Great Lakes-St Lawrence-Acadian forests
of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and western Ontario,
surface fires of moderate intensity historically occurred at intervals of 20 to 40 years
in red pine and red pine-eastern white pine forests [38,79,130,131].
High-severity, stand-replacement fires historically occurred at intervals of 150 to 300 years [27,31,38,79,129,130,131,132,140].
Red pine also occurs with jack pine. Red pine-eastern white pine-jack pine
communities, which occur within both xeric and mesic red pine regions, likely
had historic low- to moderate-severity fires at intervals of 29 to 37 years
[105] and high-severity, stand replacing fires at intervals of 100 to 300 years
[141,220,313]. Most of the research that follows focused more on surface fire-return
intervals for red pine and less on stand-replacement fire-return intervals.

The Boundary Waters Canoe Area contains some of the largest
remaining stands of red pine [127]. Red pine and eastern white pine commonly occur on
islands or on the east, north, northeast, or southeast sides of lakes, streams,
swamps, or valleys in the area. Fires commonly ignite as spot
fires and then burn as backfires, creeping down to the lakeshore or swamp edge.
The entire Boundary Waters Canoe Area had a natural fire rotation (average
time required to burn and regenerate an area equivalent to the whole
1,000,000-acre (400,000-ha) virgin forest study area) of 100 years from 1595 to 1910.
The areas dominated by red
pine and eastern white pine were likely to sustain surface fires at average
intervals of 36 years during this period (1595-1910). Since other trees in the area are so
fire sensitive, surface fires killed them, allowing for red pine regeneration. High-severity, stand-replacement
fires in red pine communities likely occurred at intervals of 150 to 300 years. Heinselman [127,128] states that some red pines in the Area have escaped fire mortality for 400 to 500
years, providing an important seed source. However, Swain [271] studied red
pine stands across the Boundary Waters Canoe Area and found no trees
that had escaped fire for longer than 202 years. The main red pine overstory
stand at Boulder Bay established following a 1681 fire and then partially
burned in 1755 and 1767. Swain was able to create a fire history of the area
beginning in 1595 with a 378-year-old red pine [271].

Itasca State Park also contains a large
population of red pine. The oldest red pine stands in Itasca State Park originated from widespread fires around 1714
[259,260]. Younger stands originated from a 1772
fire. The major present-day stands of red pine originated from fires
in 1803, 1811, and 1820. Smaller stands of red pine in the park
are from the last 2 large fires in the Park, which occurred in 1865 and 1886
[259,260]. The understory fire-return interval at Itasca State Park for 50-year periods is
presented below. Settlement began in the late 1800s and coincided with an
increased fire frequency due to land clearing and logging fires.
There have been no major fires in the park since 1918 [103,104].

Understory fire-return intervals in Itasca State
Park, Minnesota (1650-1922) [103,104]
Time period Average fire-return interval
1650-1699 16.7
1700-1749 12.5
1750-1799 12.5
1800-1849 10.0
1850-1899 5.6
1900-1922 3.1

At Deming Lake in northwestern Minnesota, Clark [53] estimated mean
fire-return intervals via fire scar and charcoal stratigraphy data in mixed forests of red pine, eastern white pine,
jack pine, and hardwoods. Overstory hardwoods were primarily paper birch,
Populus spp., sugar maple, red maple, and northern red oak. The mean
fire-return interval was 13.2 years during 1240 to 1440, when the climate was
cool and moist, and decreased to 8.6 years during 1440 to 1640, when the climate
was warm and dry. The average interval increased to 13.5 years with the
occurrence of the "Little Ice Age" from 1640 to 1910. Fire has
been excluded in the area since 1920 [53].

Two fire history studies were conducted near the dividing line between xeric
and mesic red pine communities. Using fire scar data, a
247-year-old red pine tree taken near Pointe aux Pins in Parke Township, Ontario, in 1978 showed a mean
understory fire-return interval of 29 years, with a range of 14 to 46 years, for
1727 to 1877. Fire has not burned through the area in over 100 years [11].
In south-central Ontario, Dey and Guyette [70] estimated the
understory fire-return interval for 2 periods in a site dominated by
red pine, eastern white pine, gray birch (Betula populifolia), and
quaking and bigtooth aspen. Prior to European settlement (1636-1779), the fire-return
interval was greater than 117 years. With settlement, the
fire-return interval decreased to 17 years from 1780 to 1940 [70].

Mesic sites/red pine dominant and nondominant:
Heinselman's [130] 2nd fire regime for red pine occurs in eastern white pine stands
with less red pine and a large amount of eastern hemlock, white or red spruce,
balsam fir, northern white-cedar, sugar maple, beech, yellow birch, and/or red
maple. These sites are more mesic than the former and occur from Michigan
eastward. According to Heinselman, this forest type was more likely to
have stand-replacement fires at long intervals (150-300 years) [130]. Two other researchers
claim that historic stand-replacement fire-return intervals for red pine from Michigan
eastward ranged from 150 to 350 years [62,116]. However, much of the research presented
below indicates that mesic
red pine experienced understory fire-return intervals similar to those in xeric communities.

Drever and others [77], working in the Great Lakes-St Lawrence forest of Temiscamingue,
Quebec, provide the only research substantiating the theory that long
fire-return intervals occurred in red pine communities in mesic sites. The
researchers estimated the fire-return interval for the period 1591 to 2004
was 213 years (SE 8). The researchers identified 3 distinct fire cycles:
presettlement (1591-1880), settlement (1880-1924), and postsettlement
(1924-2004). Presettlement times were characterized by a long fire cycle, which
turned to a shorter fire cycle during settlement, then returned to a longer fire cycle
during the postsettlement period. Isolating only pine-dominated sites (red pine and eastern
white pine), the mean fire-return interval for 1591 to 2004 was approximately
165 years [77].

During the summers of 1984 and 1985, Loope [173] constructed a pre-
and postsettlement fire history of Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore,
Michigan. Red pine, eastern white pine, and jack pine are primarily
found along shoreline areas and major embayments. Prior to settlement, nonlethal
understory
fires occurred at intervals of 28.2 years in pine stands containing red pine.
Following settlement, understory fires decreased. The fire-return interval in
red pine stands increased to 77 years in the 20th century [173].
Loope and Anderton [174] constructed a presettlement (before
1910) fire history for 39 small red pine communities in isolated, coastal
sand patches along the upper Great Lakes. Understory fire-free intervals before 1910 at the
39 sites ranged from 7.7 to 32.0 years, with an overall average of 18.4 (SD 
11.5) years. After 1910, the fire-free interval increased dramatically, ranging from
66 to 138 years, with an average of 88.4±14.8 years. The
researchers also constructed a presettlement fire history
for 4 upland sand plain red pine sites near Raco, Michigan. Understory fire-free
intervals
before 1910 ranged from 13.0 to 29.0 years, with an average of 23.0±13.8 years.
After 1910, the understory fire-free interval increased slightly, ranging from 19.2 to 64 years,
with an average of 29.3±26.7 years [174].

Following the 5 May 1980 Mack Lake Fire in northern Lower Michigan,
cross-sections of fire-killed red pines were analyzed to assess the
historic intervals between understory fires in the jack pine forest with
scattered red pines established in the 1820s [250]. The
Mack Lake Fire was a fast-moving (advanced 7.5 miles (12 km) in
the first 3.5 hours), large (24,000 acres (9,700 ha)) fire that consumed
270,000 tons (240,000 t) of fuel. The fire burned 16% of the total
red pine stands (3,707 acres (1,500 ha)) in the Mack Lake area [251]. Prefire red pine
ages ranged from approximately 69 to 162 years, and the earliest recorded fire in the study
area was from 1839. Understory fire-return intervals for individual trees on the 8 sites ranged from
15.1 to 33.2 years, with a mean of 24.7 years. Individual trees had an average
of 5.9 fire scars. Mean fire-return intervals across the 8 sites ranged from 15.4
to 31.0 years, with a mean of 18.9 years [250].

From 1696 to 1920 the mean fire-return interval in Algonquin Park, Ontario,
where red pine is a minor component, was 70 years. The study site is dominated by eastern white pine and quaking aspen. Red
pine is scattered throughout the park, but is not found in sizeable pure stands.
Lightning is the major source of ignition for fires in the region. Fire
exclusion began in the area in 1921 [66].

Red pine at the northern limit of its range:
At the northern limit of its range, red pine is restricted to lake landscapes and rough
topography [27,31,95]. Bergeron and Brisson [27] studied the frequency,
extent, and severity of fires at the northern limit of red pine distribution
on 2 islands in Lake Duparquet in northwest Quebec. From 1800 to 1986 there were
5 low-severity fires on a sand dune island site and 6 fires (3 low-severity, 3
high-severity) on a peninsular site (1814,
1881, 1892, 1906, 1930, and 1971), giving an average fire-return interval of
30 years (SD  18). The fire-return interval for
understory fires was shorter, averaging 25.7 years [31]. The extent of fires on both
islands was highly variable. Most fires covered 25% to 50% of the sand dune
island site. Because of the severity of the 1906 fire on the peninsular site, the extent of previous fires
could not be estimated. Boreal forests to the north of red pine's northern limit
have mostly crown fires; because large, stand-replacing fires eliminate the seed source, red pine's expansion northward is
limited [31,95].

Red pine at the eastern limit of its range:
Red pine is uncommon in New England, where it is restricted to small, isolated stands
or mixed-conifer stands on lakeshores, rocky ridges, and sand plains. These red pine
stands are small islands of fire-prone habitat surrounded by
relatively nonflammable, deciduous forests [83]. On Resin Ridge
in northern Vermont, Engstrom and Mann [83] describe a mean
interval for understory fires in red pine stands of 37.4 years, and a range of
3 to 102 years, for the period 1815 to 1987. Red pine stands at Resin Ridge occur
on steep, south-facing slopes. The majority of fires on Resin Ridge were surface
fires that neither killed mature trees nor stimulated red pine recruitment.
High-severity fires promoting red pine seedling recruitment likely occurred at
intervals of 50 to 100+ years between 1815 and 1987 [83].

In northern Vermont the fire ecology of 6 red pine populations along a 3-mile (5-km) ridge, best
described as a foothill of the Green Mountains, was
investigated for the period 1829 to 1987 [82]. Red pine was found in small, pure
clusters, and mixed with eastern white pine, red spruce, and eastern hemlock.
Mature red pines on the ridge were characteristically small, averaging 8 to 10 inches (20-30 cm) DBH
and 70 feet (20 m) tall. Between 1829 and 1987, 17 fires occurred on the ridge,
3 of which burned into at least 2 red pine stands (all within the same
population). No fires had occurred
since 1922. Following high-severity fires, regeneration pulses occurred in
the 6 populations. While red pine was the dominant canopy species, it did not
dominate the subcanopy, since fires had not occurred since 1922. The subcanopy
was dominated by eastern white pine, red spruce, American beech, and red maple [82].

Red pine is the rarest conifer species in
Newfoundland, with only 22 widely-dispersed locations containing 15,000 mature
and semimature red pines. Beginning in 1977, Roberts and Mallik [227]
sampled 8 locations to identify the age class structure and number of
mature trees originating after known fires in Newfoundland. At site 1, in
west-central Newfoundland, small fires were recorded in 1891, 1916, 1947, 1950,
1961, and 1977. At site 2, in central Newfoundland, most of the red pines
originated from 1890 fires, though fires also occurred in 1899, 1904, and
1938. At site 3, in eastern Newfoundland, most trees originated from a 1904
fire, with fires also occurring in 1946 and 1979 [227].

Age-classes and approximate % of
mature trees in each age class for red pine stands originating after
wildfires (as of 1985). Rowsells Brook and Grant's
Pit are the largest stands with >3,000 trees [227].
Age class (years) 10-40 40-60 60-80 80-120 120-150 100-250
Stands within site 1
Howley <1 90 5 0 <5 0
Birchy Narrows <1 95 0 0 0 0
Old stand 0 <1 <5 0 0 95
Rowsells Brook 0 <1 90 <5 0 <5
Stands within sites 2 and 3
Overflow Brook 0 80 5 5 5 5
Charles Arm ···* 10

···

···

···

···
Grant's Pit 5 5 80 <5 <5 <1
Terra Nova 5 5 75 <5 <5 5
*No data

Effects of fire exclusion:
As presented in research above [11,53,66,77,103,104,173],
postsettlement fire exclusion from red pine stands has caused a decrease in nonlethal
understory fires and a shift toward long return-interval, stand-replacement fires.
Long periods between fires favor
more shade-tolerant species [39,40,186].

The fire-return interval in many red pine
forests has changed, leading to the decline and near or complete extirpation of
red pine in those areas. In the pine barrens of northwestern Wisconsin,
an increased fire-return interval reduced the cover of jack pine-red pine-eastern white
pine communities by 368,000 acres (149,000 ha) from presettlement times to 1987.
In turn, hardwood species increased by 376,000 acres (152,000 ha). Red pine has
decreased in cover by 80%, and much of the red pine that does remain is on
plantations that were historically occupied by jack pine. Areas historically
covered with red pine are now dominated by quaking aspen due to a changing fire
regime or overlogging [220].

According to Heinselman's 1981 analysis [130], fire exclusion in old-growth red pine stands in the Great Lakes-St Lawrence
forests has created a "new fuels situation." In the Boundary Waters Canoe Area and Itasca State
Park, Minnesota, many red pine stands bearing fire scars from previous fires
have moderate to dense understories of balsam fir, white spruce, black
spruce, and sometimes northern white-cedar. These conifers, which have
branches nearly to the ground, have attained heights that bring their crowns in
contact with the red pine canopy, creating fuel ladders that can carry fires
into the overstory. While such understories
also developed before fire exclusion,
periodic low- to medium-severity fires reduced ladder fuels, so fire did not
often reach the canopy. If fire exclusion continues, understory fuel layer
buildup may cause fires of such intensity that the restoration of presettlement
fuel conditions will be difficult [130].

Red pine is declining in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area due to fire exclusion. Scheller
and others [239] predict that if fire exclusion
continues, red pine will continue to dwindle. Using simulation models, the
researchers predicted that if  fire was reintroduced at intervals of 50 to
100 years, red pine would increase. A fire-return interval of 300 years, while not ideal, would
increase production of red pine over current production [239].

Climate change and fire frequency/intensity:
It is suggested that global climate change will increase both the frequency and
intensity of forest fires. However, research conducted by Bergeron and Flannigan
[25] found that the opposite may be true in the
southeastern Canadian boreal forests. From the end of the "Little Ice Age"
(approximately 1850-1989), surface temperatures have risen 5 °F to 7 °F (3-4 °C) in the Lake Duparquet region of
Quebec. Yet fire frequency between 1870 and 1989 was 34% lower than in the
preceding 74 years. In the southeastern boreal forests, global warming may cause
a weakening of the upper trough over eastern Canada, shifting the polar front
north. This would lead to higher relative humidity and more precipitation,
causing a less severe fire regime than is currently present. Under this changing regime, red
pine may increase if there is enough time between stand-replacing fires to red
pine mature (20-40 years) and regenerate [25].

At Itasca State Park, Clark [54] analyzed the effect climate change has had on fire frequency over the
last 750 years. The study site consists of an interrupted canopy of red pines and
eastern white pines that are 100 to 110 feet (30-35 m) tall and 100 to
400 years old. Over the last 750 years, the fire-return interval (determined
from fire scar and
charcoal stratigraphy data) was shortest
(8.6 years (SD  2.9)) during the warm and dry
15th and 16th centuries. Cooler, moister conditions from 1240 to 1440
increased the fire-return interval to 13.2
years (SD  8.0). The fire-return interval was further increased with the onset of the
"Little Ice Age." During the mid-18th and mid-19th centuries, fire-return
intervals averaged 24.5 (SD  10.4) and 43.6 (SD 
15.9) years, respectively. Shortterm warm,
dry periods within that time frame decreased the fire-return interval to
17.9 years (SD  10.6) from 1770 to 1820 and 12.7 years (SD 
10.1) from 1870 to 1920. Fire
exclusion in the study area began in 1910 and has reduced fires
[54]. Clark [55] suggests that had fire
exclusion not been implemented, fire frequency would have increased 20%
to 40% in the 20th century due to warmer, drier conditions.

The following table provides fire regime information that may be relevant to red pine. Find further fire regime information for the plant communities in which this
species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under "Find FIRE REGIMES".


Fire regime information on vegetation communities in which red pine may occur.
For each community, fire regime characteristics are taken from the
LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment Vegetation Models
[162]. These vegetation models were developed by
local experts using available literature, local data, and/or expert opinion
as documented in the PDF file linked from the name of each
Potential Natural Vegetation Group listed below. Cells are blank where information is not available in the
Rapid Assessment Vegetation Model.

Great Lakes
Northeast
Southern Appalachians


Great Lakes
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group)
Fire severity*
Fire regime
characteristics
Percent of fires
 Mean interval
(years)
Minimum interval
(years)
Maximum interval
(years)
Great Lakes Woodland

Great Lakes pine barrens Replacement 8% 41 10 80
Mixed 9% 36 10 80
Surface or low 83% 4 1 20
Jack pine-open lands (frequent fire-return interval) Replacement 83% 26 10 100
Mixed 17% 125 10  
Northern oak savanna Replacement 4% 110 50 500
Mixed 9% 50 15 150
Surface or low 87% 5 1 20
Great Lakes Forested
Northern hardwood maple-beech-eastern hemlock Replacement 60% >1,000    
Mixed 40% >1,000    
Conifer lowland (embedded in fire-prone system) Replacement 45% 120 90 220
Mixed 55% 100    
Conifer lowland (embedded in fire-resistant ecosystem) Replacement 36% 540 220 >1,000
Mixed 64% 300    
Great Lakes floodplain forest
Mixed 7% 833    
Surface or low 93% 61    
Great Lakes spruce-fir Replacement 100% 85 50 200
Minnesota spruce-fir (adjacent to Lake Superior and Drift and Lake Plain) Replacement 21% 300    
Surface or low 79% 80    
Great Lakes pine forest, jack pine Replacement 67% 50    
Mixed 23% 143    
Surface or low 10% 333
Maple-basswood Replacement 33% >1,000    
Surface or low 67% 500    
Maple-basswood mesic hardwood forest (Great Lakes) Replacement 100% >1,000 >1,000 >1,000
Maple-basswood-oak-aspen Replacement 4% 769    
Mixed 7% 476    
Surface or low 89% 35    
Northern hardwood-eastern hemlock forest (Great Lakes) Replacement 99% >1,000    
Pine-oak Replacement 19% 357    
Surface or low 81% 85    
Red pine-eastern white pine (frequent fire) Replacement 38% 56    
Mixed 36% 60    
Surface or low 26% 84    
Red pine-eastern white pine (less frequent fire) Replacement 30% 166    
Mixed 47% 105    
Surface or low 23% 220    
Great Lakes pine forest,
eastern white pine-eastern hemlock (frequent fire)
Replacement 52% 260    
Mixed 12% >1,000    
Surface or low 35% 385    

Eastern white
pine-eastern hemlock
Replacement 54% 370    
Mixed 12% >1,000    
Surface or low 34% 588    
Northeast
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group)
Fire severity*
Fire regime
characteristics
Percent of fires
Mean interval
(years)
Minimum interval
(years)
Maximum interval
(years)
Northeast Woodland
Eastern woodland mosaic Replacement 2% 200 100 300
Mixed 9% 40 20 60
Surface or low 89% 4 1 7
Rocky outcrop pine (Northeast) Replacement 16% 128    
Mixed 32% 65    
Surface or low 52% 40    
Pine barrens Replacement 10% 78    
Mixed 25% 32    
Surface or low 65% 12    
Oak-pine (eastern dry-xeric) Replacement 4% 185    
Mixed 7% 110    
Surface or low 90% 8    
Northeast Forested
Northern hardwoods (Northeast) Replacement 39% >1,000    
Mixed 61% 650    
Eastern white pine-northern hardwoods Replacement 72% 475    
Surface or low 28% >1,000    
Northern hardwoods-eastern hemlock Replacement 50% >1,000    
Surface or low 50% >1,000    
Northern hardwoods-spruce Replacement 100% >1,000 400 >1,000
Beech-maple Replacement 100% >1,000    
Northeast spruce-fir forest Replacement 100% 265 150 300
Southern Appalachians
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group)
Fire severity*
Fire regime
characteristics
Percent of fires
Mean interval
(years)
Minimum interval
(years)
Maximum interval
(years)
Southern Appalachians Woodland
Table Mountain-pitch pine Replacement 5% 100    
Mixed 3% 160    
Surface or low 92% 5    

*Fire Severities—

Replacement: Any fire that causes greater than 75% top removal of a vegetation-fuel type,
resulting in general replacement of existing vegetation; may or may not cause a lethal effect on the plants.

Mixed: Any fire burning more than 5% of an area that does not qualify as a replacement, surface, or low-severity fire;
includes mosaic and other fires that are intermediate in effects.

Surface or low: Any fire that causes less than 25% upper layer
replacement and/or removal in a vegetation-fuel class but burns 5% or more of
the area [118,161].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Fire Management Considerations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: cone, crown fire, density, duff, fire intensity, flame length, forest, fuel, hardwood, herbaceous, litter, prescribed fire, seed, species richness, surface fire, tree

Prescribed fire:
Prescribed fire can be used to prepare a bare mineral seedbed
for red pine and to reduce competing vegetation [11,15,79].
To prepare a seedbed, remove aboveground portions of competing vegetation,
and keep from crown scorching mature red pines, McRae and others [187] caution
that flame length should not exceed 3 feet (1 m) and recommend a frontal fire intensity ranging from 400 to 600 kW/m.
Understory prescribed burning is best in spring [187]. Two
successive burns may be required to remove understory species, particularly
beaked hazelnut, and to prepare a mineral seedbed [79]. A review of the positive
and negative effects of prescribed burning in red
pine stands by Dickmann [72] is available. Guidelines for prescribed fire in red
pine stands are available in these sources: [187,293]. Prescribed fire can be
used in seed-producing red pine stands to control red pine cone beetle. Spring
burning these stands may kill up to 100% of beetles, while fall burns may result in 95% insect mortality [15].

Avian populations:
Many bird species preferred burned over logged
mixed conifer-deciduous forests in northeastern
Minnesota. Schulte and Niemi [242]
conducted bird censuses in early-successional burned (7%
red pine cover) and logged forests (1% red
pine cover) during breeding seasons, 2 and 3 years
after fire. Time of logging was not provided; logged sites were
selected to match the burned site. Overall bird species richness and density
(territorial males/ha) were significantly higher in burned than logged forests (P<0.05) [242].



Bark beetles:
Bark beetle attacks on red pines may increase following fire,
though immediate mortality is rare. In a 44-year-old red pine stand,
local burning of red pine boles caused a significant increase
in bark beetle attacks (P=0.0044), but 6 years
after treatments only 2 of the 58 experimental trees was killed. The trees, averaging 60 feet
(SD  4.9) (18.3 m (SD 
1.5)) tall, were located near Colfax, Wisconsin. They were burned with a propane torch on
23 June. Bark beetles (Ips pini and I. grandicollis)began to land on the burned area of the trees within the
first week; highest landing rates were in the week following burning.
Bark beetle attacks on burned red pines were more than double those on unburned
trees, and attacks were almost always (79 of 86 attacks) within the scorched area
of the tree. Most beetles failed to reproduce [171].

An April prescribed fire in an old-growth red pine stand in Itasca State Park
caused a temporary increase in bark beetle infestations [236]. Red pines were
charred to a mean height of 15
feet (SD  11.5) (4.57 m (SD 
3.51)), with a range of
1.1 to 37.86 feet (0.35-11.54 m). By 1 May, I. pini had increased two-fold over prefire levels but by the middle of July
had returned to prefire levels. Bark beetle species I. grandicollis and
I. perroti did not increase at any time following burning [236].

Changes in understory:
Many studies are available on the effects of low-severity prescribed fires on red pine understory species
where red pine was not affected by the fire(s) [41,42,43,67,190,191,198].

Fuels

Duff consumption and moisture content:
Prescribed fire can be used to prepare a mineral seedbed for red pine. Fires set
when litter is moist may not be effective because duff consumption decreases as
duff moisture content increases
[318]. A prescribed fire, set in a stand of red pine and eastern white pine in the Ottawa
River Valley, illustrates how duff moisture content affects duff consumption. The
fire had flame lengths of 1 to 4.9 feet (0.3-1.5 m) and a rate of
spread of 1 to 10 feet (0.3-3 m)/minute. At approximately 20% moisture content, 2.8
kg/m² of duff was consumed. The rate of duff
consumption steadily declined to 0.5 kg/m²
of duff consumed at 80% moisture content, and 0% duff
consumed at approximately 135% duff moisture content. The researcher also
measured the percent of surface soil bared in relation to duff
moisture content. At 20% moisture content, 30% of the
surface was bared to mineral soil. About 5% of bared soil was at 60%
moisture content [289].

At Petawawa Forest Experiment Station, Chalk River,
Ontario, Van Wagner [287] sampled the dry weight and bulk density of
the duff layer in a 35-year-old red pine forest with an average DBH of 5.8
inches (15 cm) from May to October during 1964 to 1967. The average duff dry
weight was 0.85 lb/ft², with a range of 0.38 to 1.78 lb/ft². The average bulk
density of the duff layer was 0.064 g/cc, with a range of 0.042 to 0.124 g/cc [287].

Litter:
In red pine stands, needle litter accumulates at
increasing rates until shortly after crown closure. At this point, accumulation
levels off at values ranging from 11,000 to 16,000 lbs/acre [160,203]. Fuel
loadings in northern Ontario red pine stands are approximately 5.3 tons/acre of
woody surface fuel and 10.5 tons/acre of forest floor material
(Stocks and others as cited in [79]). Fuels in red pine stands may
"stabilize after several years", so fuel reduction
may not be needed to prevent stand-replacement fires [79].

Brown [37] measured surface fuels in 9 red pine stands
in National Forests of Michigan and Minnesota, ranging from 21 to
180 years old with basal areas/acre of 85 to 195 feet². The dry
weight of surface fuels, consisting of needles (55%), branches (20%), and
herbaceous and miscellaneous vegetation (25%), was highly variable. The average
weight/acre was 5,600 lbs, with a range of 2,900 to 9,800 lbs. Dry
weight of the total surface fuels (surface, litter, and duff) was also extremely variable,
averaging 32,800 lbs/acre but ranging from 10,800 to 74,600 lbs/acre [37].

Following the May 1971 Little Sioux fire in northeastern
Minnesota, total fall of litter and woody material measured for a 3-year
period on a burned site exceeded that of an unburned site. The burn area was a
mosaic of hardwood (quaking aspen, paper birch, red maple, and northern red oak), pine
(red pine, eastern white pine, and jack pine), and spruce-fir (black spruce,
white spruce, and balsam fir) stands. The prefire overstory basal
area was 15.6 m²/ha; postfire measurements were not provided [113].

Total litter and woody material fall (g/m²)
during 3 postfire years in a mosaic forest of northeastern Minnesota [113]
Site Needles Leaves Wood Miscellaneous Total
Unburned 141.0 75.8* 77.4 47.5** 341.7
Burned 209.5** 47.8 297.5** 20.5 575.3**

*Values within the same column are significantly
different at the 0.05 level.

**Values within the same column are significantly different at the 0.01 level.

There is little variability in ash and
silica-free ash content of dead red pine litter throughout the year. Red pine
dead litter ash and silica-free ash content were measured at 2 sites in Lower
Michigan during fall, spring, and early summer in 1973 and 1974. Ash content
ranged from 2.1% to 3.0%, and silica-free ash content ranged from 1.6% to 2.3% [172].

Crown fuels:
Brown [36] estimated crown fuel weights of
uncut red pine stands of varying ages in the Huron-Manistee National Forest in
Lower Michigan [36].

Dry weight/acre of live and dead red pine
crown material [36]
Age (years) Tree/acre Needle weight (lbs) Total crown weight (lbs)
15 1,200 10,000 20,000
25 1,000 18,000 40,000

Moisture content of crown fuels:
The moisture content is greater in new red pine needles (<1 year
old) than in old needles (>2 years old). Measurements were taken from trees in
Minnesota and Michigan throughout the 1962 and 1963 growing seasons. The
moisture content of new needles declined throughout the growing season from a
high of about 200% in late June to a low of 135% in October. Moisture content in
old needles fluctuated (from 100-125%) throughout the growing season [145].

Van Wagner [286] measured the moisture content of new (current year's growth)
and old (previous year's growth) red pine foliage from 1962 to 1965 in eastern
Canada. The trees, growing on dry, sandy loam or dry sand, ranged from 20 to 40
years old and from 4 to 9 inches (10-20 cm) in diameter.
The moisture content of new foliage reached a maximum of 270% in the middle of
June and steadily declined to a low of 130% in October. Old foliage had a much
lower moisture content, reaching a maximum of 110% in mid-March, declining to a
low of 90% in early June, then increasing to approximately 107% by the end of
October [286].



Flammability:
Dense, pure red pine stands with trees less than 60
feet tall and a "clean" forest floor have higher potential for crown fire than
stands of any other northeastern tree species
[94,257]. Red pine stands are highly flammable until they reach about 60 feet (20 m) in height. Crown fire
potential is less in stands taller than 60 feet (20 m) due to increasingly clear boles. Small crown fires in 50-foot-high
(20 m) red pine plantations have
energy outputs up to 6,500 BTU/sec-ft [288].
Red pine stands have thick, loose needle litter. They produce more litter on more productive sites, but production
may drop off and reach equilibrium soon after crown closure. While litter is
produced faster on productive sites than on poorer ones, crown closure occurs
faster on productive sites, thus shortening the period when fires are likely to
crown. Young stands are very flammable due to a well-aerated litter layer [3,230]. As understory species establish
in red pine stands, they create a layer of less flammable material [79,287].

Van Wagner [290] measured the heat of combustion of live red pine needles, freshly fallen
leaf litter, and summer needle litter from trees in the Petawawa Forest
Experiment Station, Ontario. The heat of combustion for the 3 samples was 5,216
(SE 40) cal/g, 5,327 (SE 22) cal/g, and 5,069 (SE 56) cal/g, respectively [290].

Growth:
Based on tree ring data collected from red pines in
central Newfoundland, red pine growth is generally depressed immediately following fires,
but after approximately 4 years a surge in growth occurs that lasts for 4 or
more years. After the initial red pine recovery period, increased growth is
promoted by nutrient increases from the burned or charred organic material, removal of competing
vegetation, and stand thinning [227].

Insect control with fire:
Red pine cone beetles can cause extensive
damage to red pine cones. Serious infestations of the beetle can
lead to 20% to 100% cone mortality. In the Great Lakes States, red pine cone beetles
overwintered on the ground in red pine buds that fell from approximately 22 October to 10 May. To
assess the effect fire has on red pine cone beetles, Miller [193]
conducted prescribed burns in Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin during fall
(8-10 November) and spring (29 April), when beetles were overwintering
on the ground. Spring burning caused complete mortality of red pine cone
beetles, with fall burning causing 95% mortality [193].

Leaf nutrient concentrations:
Following a surface fire in Newfoundland, red
pine needle nutrient content (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) increased and
maximum levels occurred 3 months after fire. Nutrient levels dropped
"considerably" by postfire year 1 [227]. Nutrient content of red pine needles
before and 1 year after fire are provided by Roberts and Mallik [227].

Limnology:
Following the 14 May 1971 Little Sioux Fire in northeastern Minnesota, Tarapchak
and Wright [275] measured the effect that runoff from the
burned forest (partially virgin red pine) had on Meander and Lamb Lake. For 2
years, beginning immediately after the fire, the researchers found no
significant increases in lake levels of major ions, silica, total nitrogen, and
phosphorus. Further effects of the Little Sioux Fire on the region's
lakes are described in the article by Wright [320].

Logging:
Logging followed by broadcast burning of red pine stands is generally unsuccessful
in regenerating red pine stands if seed source is removed [248]. In 1979,
a pine-hardwood forest containing red pine (69 stems/ha and a basal
area of 0.87 m²/ha) was clearcut and burned,
eliminating red pine. By 1985, no red pine recruitment had
occurred at the site, and future recruitment may require an outside seed source [238].

Plantations:
Information pertaining to fire and red pine plantations is available from
these sources: [73,74,133,134,291,309,317].

Wildlife:
Vogl [297] provides information on the benefits of burning red pine and other wildlife habitats in Wisconsin.

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Growth Form (according to Raunkiær Life-form classification)

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info on this topic.

More info for the term: phanerophyte

RAUNKIAER [222] LIFE FORM:



Phanerophyte
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat characteristics

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: basal area, climax, cone, cover, forest, hardwood, seed, shrubs, tree

Red pine is most common on level or gently rolling sand plains
or low ridges adjacent to lakes and swamps [89,231,252].
It may also grow on rocky and open habitats [178] and on poorly-drained, dry, windswept slopes [137,163,267].

Climate/weather:
Red pine is native to areas with cool to warm summers, cold winters, and low to moderate
precipitation. Within its range, average January temperatures vary from
0 to 25 °F (-18 to -4 °C), and average July temperatures vary from 60 to 70 °F (16-20 °C).
Average annual maximum temperatures range from 90 to 100 °F (32-38 °C) and
average annual minimum temperatures from -10 to -40 °F (-23 to -40 °C). Average
annual precipitation is from 20 to 40 inches (510-1,010 mm) throughout much of
its range, but reaches 60 inches (1,520 mm) in some eastern localities. The
average growing season precipitation ranges from 15 to 25 inches (380-640 mm), and
average annual snowfall ranges from 40 to 120 inches (1,000-3,000 mm). Summer
droughts of 30 or more days are common in the western half of red pine's range. The
frost-free period is from 80 to 160 days, though it may be as short as 40 days
northeast of Lake Superior in Ontario [48,97,101,106,137,231,266].

According to research in Chippewa County, Michigan, precipitation is closely related to radial
growth in red pine throughout the growing season. Warm spring temperatures initiate the growing season
but have little effect on radial
growth. Dils and Day [75] found prolonged dry periods caused a leveling off of
radial growth. Red pine radial growth immediately began to increase with the
onset of "significant" precipitation [75].

Drought:
While regeneration in red pine is most dependent upon fire, climate may also be
a factor. Above-normal temperatures, alternating with periods of freezing and
thawing, may kill seed; and seedlings may be damaged by frost and desiccation. Bergeron and Brisson [28] studied the effect
of temperature and precipitation on red pine regeneration
from 1913 to 1986 at Lac Duparquet in northwestern Quebec. Regeneration was
positively correlated with above-average precipitation. On an island site, red pine regeneration was negatively
correlated with above-average temperature (P<0.05). The researchers noted
that drought limited red pine regeneration most [28].

Mature red pine is drought tolerant [137], but needles may turn reddish brown
when very dry conditions persist over several growing seasons. Red pine
mortality may occur during "severe" drought [136].

Frost:
Young red pines are susceptible to
spring frost, which can severely damage or kill new growth. Sites where frost damage is most
likely include depressions and breaks where air drainage is limited and on
exposed, dry sand flats where rapid cooling occurs at night [252,266]. Sakai
and Weiser [234] found that mature trees in northern Wisconsin
were highly resistant to freezing. Laboratory tests showed that dormant buds, leaves, and
twigs from mature trees were uninjured to temperatures of -200 °F (-80 °C) [234].

Flooding:
Red pine can survive
temporary flooding, but flooding reduces growth. Ahlgren [6] studied the effect
of temporary flooding on red pine at Basswood Lake,
Ontario. He found that red pines in the 1- to 4-foot (0.3-1 m)
size class suffered greater terminal growth stunting and slower crown
recovery than trees in the 5- to 12-foot (2-4 m) class. Trees in the
flooded area were submerged in at least 4 feet (1 m) of water for 20
to 48 days during May and June. All sizes of red pine had at least a 90%
survival rate when flooded for 28 days or less. Red pines in the 5- to 12-foot (2-3.7 m)
class had a better than 90% survival rate at sites flooded
for up to 48 days [6].

Wind:
Red pine is susceptible to wind
damage [86]. Following two July 1983 windstorms in a pine/maple (Pinus spp./Acer
spp.) and pine/fir (Abies spp.) community in
Itasca State Park, red pine suffered some mortality. While not directly

measured, wind speeds likely reached 60 to 75 mph. Red pine was the dominant
overstory tree in both communities, constituting 39.4% of total basal area in
the pine/maple forest and 36.1% of total basal area in the pine/fir forest.
The windstorm killed 0.6% of all red pines in the 100-acre (40-ha)
pine/maple study area and 0.7% of all red pines in the 5-acre (2-ha) pine/fir study area [308].

Global climate change:
Gradual climate warming is predicted to temporarily increase red pine abundance but
eventually lead to decline. He and others [124] modeled the
effect a 9 °F (5 °C) increase in
temperature would have on trees characteristic of northwestern Wisconsin over a
100-year period. They extended their model out an additional 200 years, with the
mean annual temperature held constant at the 100-year period increase.
Current red pine cover is 8%; the model predicts it will increase with warming to
18% due to the decline of northern hardwood species. However, after 300
years of increased temperatures, the model predicts red pine cover near 0% [124].
Other models suggest that a substantial decline in red pine will occur
throughout its range if annual temperatures increase from 2.7 °F to 8.1 °F (1.5-4.5 °C) by the end of the 21st
century [207,208].

Models predict that future warming of 0.03 °F (0.02 °C)/year in summer and 0.05 °F (0.03 °C)/year in
winter will cause the eventual extinction of red pine in northern Michigan after about 400 years. Red pine will likely
be replaced by maples, ashes, oaks, and eastern hemlocks [256].

Northern range:
At the northern edge of its range, red pine is restricted to lake landscapes and
rough topography [27]. Red pine
may have low cone and seed production at its northern limit [34,92]. However, Sutton and
others [270] found this was untrue on Black Island in Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba. In the
year 2000, they found red pine produced from 50 to 200 cones/tree, which is
well within its normal range at lower latitudes. Further, red pines
produced cones during 3 successive years (1999-2001).
The researchers also found that reproduction characteristics (cone length,
seeds/cone, and germination success) were well within the normal range found in
southern climes [27].

Elevation:
Red pine typically grows from 700 to 1,400 feet (200-430 m) in elevation [23,96,97]. In
New England it is found up to 2,000 feet (600 m) [97], in New York up to 3,480 feet (1,060 m) [157],
and in West Virginia it may occur at over 4,000 feet (1,200 m) [97].

Soils:
Red pine grows best on well-drained, aerated sandy to loamy soils,
typically of glacial outwash origin [22,23,59,79,80,92,157,157,243,281].
It is most common on Entisols, followed in order by Spodosols, Alfisols, and
Inceptisols [231]. Red pine can grow on poorly-drained sands [315]. However,
there is a great chance of root stunting and mortality where it grows on poorly-drained
soils [266]. It may also grow on heavy soils, but its growth is impeded by hardwood
species that favor such soils [266]. Red pine performs best where the water table is from 4 to
9 feet (1-3 m) below the soil surface [231].

In red pine old-growth stands in the Great Lake States, the organic layer
seldom builds up to a depth greater than 2 to 6 inches (5-15 cm) [79,144,231].

Red pine grows poorly on potassium-deficient soils [252], but can grow on
soils deficient in nitrogen and phosphorus [266]. The optimum soil pH range for
red pine is from 5.2 to 6.5, but it can grow on soils with pH of 4.0 to 7.5 [165,252,266].

Minimum red pine soil growing
requirements on well-drained soils [266]
Organic matter (%) 1.3
Exchange capacity (me/100 g) 3.5
Total N (%) 0.05
Available P (kg/ha) 28.0
Available K (kg/ha) 78.0
Exchangeable Ca (me/100 g) 0.80
Exchangeable Mg (me/100 g) 0.20

In northern Lower Michigan, red pine's occurrence in quaking aspen-dominated
stands is largely determined by soil. Red pine is found only on dry-mesic sites
with sandy upland soils. Red pine declines in quaking aspen communities as soils
become moister and heavier [228].

Erosion:
Reduced growth occurs in red pines growing on eroded sandy soil. Farrish [90] measured the basal area,
diameter, and height of 46-year-old red pines growing in eroded and uneroded
sandy outwash soil in Newaygo County, Michigan.
Soil thickness on uneroded sites was approximately 26 inches (66 cm) and on eroded
sites was near 10 inches (25 cm). Basal area of red
pine averaged slightly less on eroded than uneroded sites. Diameter and height of red pine
were significantly less on
eroded than on uneroded sites (P<0.003) [90].

Associated species by soil type:
On coarse, dry soil, common associates include jack pine, quaking aspen, bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata),
paper birch, northern pin oak (Q. ellipsoidalis), and bear oak (Q.
ilicifolia) [22,23,31,50,79,114,231,252]. On fine to loamy sands, in
addition to the foregoing, red pine is associated with eastern white pine, red
maple, black cherry, northern red oak, white oak (Q. alba), chestnut oak (Q.
prinus), balsam fir (Abies balsamea), and black spruce (Picea
mariana) [22,23,31,79,231]. On sandy loam and loam soils, red pine associates include sugar
maple (Acer saccharum), eastern white pine, basswood (Tilia americana),
red maple, balsam fir, paper birch, yellow birch (B. alleghaniensis),
American beech (Fagus grandifolia), northern red oak, eastern hemlock (Tsuga
canadensis), white spruce (P. glauca), white ash (Fraxinus
americana), red spruce (P. rubens), northern white-cedar (Thuja
occidentalis), and eastern hophornbeam (Ostrya virginiana) [23,50,79,231].

At Lake Itasca State Park, Minnesota, red pine is likely an edaphic climax species.
Sterile, sandy soils were colonized by herbs, shrubs, and jack pine. Red pine
began to establish as jack pine improved soil conditions by adding organic
matter and thus improving soil moisture holding capacity. Eventually jack pine-red pine communities transitioned
into pure red pine stands, since jack pine has a shorter life cycle and is less
tolerant of shade than red pine. At the time of study, red pine was failing
to reproduce and being replaced by sugar maple, balsam fir,
and white spruce [165].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Immediate Effect of Fire

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: prescribed fire, surface fire, tree

Mature red pine (beginning at age 20 to 40) can survive low- to
moderate-severity surface fires [4,15,27,46,56,57,72,94,134] due to thick, fire-resistant bark
[4,46,51,94,95,125,126,141,147,288] that protects the tree's cambium [230].
High-severity fires raise the risk of tree mortality via crown fires,
crown scorch, cambial injury, and root mortality [4,15,29,72,94,134]. Red pine can,
however, survive following "substantial" crown scorch [72,134,187,189,285],
cambial injury [44,230,288], charring [227], and needle kill [269]. Trees have a
better chance of survival following crown scorch if scorch occurs before bud
flush [187]. Van Wagner's [288] prescribed fire studies red pine stands in eastern
Canada showed that surface fires of less than 200 BTU/sec-ft rarely scorch the
crown of red pine, a surface fire of 500 BTU/sec-ft is "on the edge of dangerous"
for the largest red pines, and a surface fire of 1,000 BTU/sec-ft or more
results in complete red pine mortality.

Red pine seedlings and saplings are more susceptible than mature trees to fire mortality [3,129,130]
and heat damage (see Heat tolerance). Crown fires
are much more likely in younger red pine stands, where crowns are closer to the
ground [3]. Red pine stands may support crown fires at 15 to
20 years of age [129,130]. However, Methven [189] found that
red pine seedlings can survive following a high degree of needle scorch.
There was little information (as of 2008) on the immediate effect of fire on the
seeds and/or cones of red pine, though several researchers state that cones and
seeds are "very susceptible" to fire mortality [4,129,130,230].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Importance to Livestock and Wildlife

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: cover, forest, frequency, tree

While red pine is an important tree species for wildlife, but there is
little in the literature describing its importance. The seeds are listed as a
valuable food for wildlife [80], and Naylor [197] states
that approximately 80% of the wildlife found in central Ontario use forests
containing red pine and/or eastern white pine. In 2 reviews, however, red pine stands are described
as poor habitat for game birds and animals [231,252].

Birds:
Red pine stands can support a large variety of bird species. The Kirtland's warbler and the pine
warbler are found exclusively in eastern white pine-jack pine-red pine
stands, highly preferring jack pine stands over 80 acres (30 ha) in size [48,221].
Red pine and mixed stands with red pine provide habitat for numerous bird
species in north-central and northeastern US forests [199,276,277]. Bald eagles
and osprey nest in and colonies of great blue heron use
red pines along waterways in central Ontario. Many other species of birds nest in
red pines in central Ontario. See Naylor [197] for an extensive list of birds
using red pine habitats.


Ungulates:
Red pine is a low-preference food for
white-tailed deer in Minnesota [91] and Massachusetts [138]. In northeastern Minnesota,
white-tailed deer browse red pine minimally in the
winter. Most red pine browsed is blowndown trees and limbs [310]. Red pine in northeastern
Minnesota is a very minor moose dietary
component, with the highest use occurring in the winter [213]. During the dormant
season in the Lake Superior region, moose show a
"moderate" preference for red pine browse [12].


Small mammals:
Red pine is a major food of snowshoe hares of Canada [120]. Eastern white pine and red pine
are the 2 most preferred conifer species for snowshoe hares. During the winters of 1958 to 1961, snowshoe
hares on Manitoulin Island, Ontario, heavily browsed red pine bark and browsed
red pine needles with medium to high intensity [69]. Snowshoe hares also browse
red pine seedlings in the winter and can damage seedlings. In Quebec, snowshoe
hare damage to 3-year-old red pine seedlings was primarily incomplete stem
girdling or complete browsing of terminal shoots,
while some seedlings incurred severe browsing of the trunk or complete girdling
of the stem below the lowest whorl of lateral branches [24].


In a mixed forest in northern Wisconsin, red squirrels abundantly consume red pine seeds.
Red squirrels cache red pine cones in tunnels
beneath middens not exceeding 3 feet (1 m) in diameter and 5.9 inches (15 cm)
deep. Eastern gray squirrels also feed on red pine seeds in the area, but not with
the abundance that red squirrels do [226]. White-footed mice and meadow
voles of the Northeast have a high preference for red pine seeds [1].


Palatability/nutritional value:
At the time of this review (2008), there was only one article pertaining to the
nutritional value of red pine foliage and no articles discussing the
palatability of red pine. For foliar nutrient concentrations of mature red
pines on the Cloquet Forestry Center, Minnesota, see Comerford and White [59].


Cover value:
Red pine is an important cover species for a variety of bird species and other wildlife
[22,231,252]. It is a prime nesting tree for bald eagles. On the Chippewa
National Forest, Minnesota, 78% of bald eagle nests occur in red pines or eastern
white pines. Bald eagles almost always nest in live trees. They position
their nest below the crown at a main branch. Ospreys also nest in red pine and
eastern white pines at Chippewa, but with less frequency (18%).
Ospreys build their nests at the top of the tree [182]. Bald eagles also nest in red pine
on the Superior National Forest, Minnesota, but prefer eastern white
pine [183]. Bird species listed
in the literature as using red pine for cover include prairie sharp-tailed grouse
in the pine barrens of Wisconsin [117] and in northeast and
north-central Minnesota [119], barred owls in north-central
Minnesota [143], and ruffed grouse in Minnesota [179].


Downed red pine and red pine cavities are used as cover for a
large variety of mammals in central Ontario [197]. Red and eastern gray squirrels
use red pine stands for cover in mixed forests of
northern Wisconsin [226]. Red pine, black spruce, jack pine, and
eastern white pine are favored
nesting trees for red squirrels in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area [128].
Snowshoe hares are prevalent in red pine communities in north-central
Minnesota [215]. Gray wolves travel through and live within red pine and mixed forest stands
on the Superior National Forest [188]. Bats in
Manistee National Forest, Michigan, use red pine as cover to hunt for flies,
moths, and caddis flies [280].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Key Plant Community Associations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: association, forest, habitat type, hardwood, mesic, xeric

Red pine is generally the dominant overstory species where it occurs. It may
occur as an understory species with eastern white pine
(P. strobus) and/or jack pine(P. banksiana). Red pine is found in
pure, mixed-conifer, mixed-conifer/hardwood, and hardwood stands.
Throughout most of its habitats, red pine can be both an early- and late-seral
species and most commonly occurs with eastern white pine. In outlying West Virginia
populations, red pine is most often a late-seral
species on xeric rocky sites with pitch pine (P. rigida),
Virginia pine (P. virginiana), and Table Mountain pine (P. pungens) [64,231].
For a list of common red pine associates by soil type,
see Associated species by soil type.
For lists of associated species of red pine, see the following sources:
[23,50,64,79,114,231].

Red pine is described as a dominant species in the following vegetation
classifications and locations.



Michigan:



  • Red pine communities on sand dunes at the southern end of Lake Michigan [65]



  • Red pine communities on the Vanderbilt moraines in the lower part of the state



  • Red pine communities on sand dunes on the west coast of Lake Michigan



  • Eastern white pine-red pine communities on steep end-moraine ridges of Williamsburg



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on Presque Isle at the extreme northern end of the lower part of the state



  • Red pine communities in upland forests near Cheboygan



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests at the Grand Marais Sandy End moraine and outwash area of Lake Superior



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the Spread Eagle-Dunbar Barrens



  • Eastern white pine-red pine-northern red oak (Quercus rubra) forests on the Michigamme Highland



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the Lac Veaux Desert outwash plain



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests in the Gogebic-Penokee Iron Range



  • Eastern white pine-red pine-northern red oak on bedrock ridges with thin soil at Calumet [10]



  • Eastern white pine-red pine-quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) forest at Isle Royale National Park [278]




Minnesota:


  • Red pine communities on upland sites of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area [112]



  • Red pine communities near the shores of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area [202]



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the Mille Lac uplands along Mille Lac Lake



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on Itasca, Alexandria, and St Croix moraines



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the Black Duck till plains



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the St Louis moraines



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the North Shore Highlands of Lake Superior



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests along the Border Lakes



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the Littlefork-Vermilion uplands [10]



  • Red pine-eastern white pine/twinflower (Linnaea borealis)
    habitat type on dry hilltops and upper slopes of Voyageurs National Park [159]



  • Red pine-jack pine upland forests on sand or loamy sand soils in Itasca State Park [142]




New Hampshire:



  • Red pine-eastern white pine-paper birch-maple (Betula papyrifera-Acer spp.) subclimax association at low elevations
    on shallow sandy soil of the White Mountain National Forest



  • Northern red oak-eastern white pine-red pine-red maple (A. rubrum) subclimax association on long, steep southerly-facing
    slopes at low to middle elevation in the White Mountain National Forest



  • Red pine-eastern white pine-red maple forest association on deep sandy or cobble
    outwash soils in the White Mountain National Forest [93]




New York:



  • Eastern white pine-red pine-jack pine ecosystem on smooth to irregular plains and tablelands [106]




Wisconsin:



  • Red pine-eastern white pine on sand bars of the lee shores of the Apostle Islands [20]



  • Red pine-eastern white pine-jack pine communities on outwash soils of southern Washburn County [81]



  • Eastern white pine-red pine communities on the Spread Eagle-Dunbar Barrens



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the Lac Veaux Desert outwash plain



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests in the Gogebic-Penokee Iron Range



  • Eastern white pine-red pine forests on the Mille Lac uplands along Mille Lac Lake [10]




Ontario:



  • Red pine monotypic communities on sand barrens of the Ottawa Valley [49]



  • Red pine monotypic or mixed red pine-eastern white pine-jack pine
    communities, typically on level or rolling sand plains [23]



  • Red pine upland forests in Algonquin Park [218]




United States regions:



  • Red pine monotypic or mixed red pine-eastern white pine-jack pine
    communities, typically on level or rolling sand plains in the Lake States [23]



  • Eastern white pine-red pine-jack pine ecosystem on smooth to irregular plains
    and tablelands of the northern Lake States and parts of New England [106,233,283]



  • Red pine-eastern white pine forests in mesic areas and grading into the
    ice-contact hills of the northern Great Lakes [232]




Canadian regions:



  • Red pine communities in the Great Lakes Canadian forests [50]


license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Life Form

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the term: tree

Tree
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Management considerations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: cone, cover, forest, root collar, seed, tree

Bark:
Information on the chemical constituents of red pine bark is available in Harum and Labosky [123].

Browsing:
White-tailed deer browsing can decrease red pine cover. White-tailed deer exclusion
from a 230-year-old red pine forest promoted establishment and growth of red pine saplings in
Itasca State Park. In 1937, white-tailed deer were excluded from a
severely overbrowsed red pine site. At the time, white-tailed deer numbers were at or above starvation levels, and
virtually no red pine saplings (or saplings of any other tree species) were
present. By 1948, 84 red pine saplings ranging from 0.49 to 6.9 feet (0.15-2.1 m) high
occurred in the 2-acre (1-ha) plot, while 0 saplings existed outside the enclosure.
Beginning in the late 1940s, white-tailed deer were virtually eliminated from
the Park due to hunting, so red pine saplings recovered outside of the
exclosure. By 1957, there were 99 saplings inside and 309 outside the
exclosure ranging from 0.49 to 6.9 feet (0.15-2.1 m) tall [229].


Disease:
Red pine is relatively free of disease problems. Diseases that most commonly infect
red pine are Fomes root rot [252], Scleroderris canker [252], and shoestring root rot [252].


Herbicides:
There are several articles on the effects of herbicides
on red pine. Sasaki and Kozlowski [237] studied the effects of 8
common herbicides on red pine seed germination and early seedling
development. The effects of 11 different herbicides on red pine seed
germination is reviewed by Baskin and Baskin [19]. Noste and Phipps [201] and McCormack [185]
provide information on the effects herbicides meant to control weeds have on red pine.


Host species:
Red pine is rarely a host to eastern dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium pusillum) [206].


Insects:
Red pine is exploited by over 200 insect
species. Insect diversity is less than 50 species for most pine species [68]. The most serious insect damage to red pine is
to seed production during the second year of cone development [252]. Insects that most commonly attack and damage red pine
are the pine root collar weevil [76], pine shoot beetle [154],
European pine shoot moth [252], jack pine budworm [252], red pine cone beetle [193,252], and white pine weevil [252].


Studies in Michigan indicate that bark beetles produced little red pine
damage to unburned trees and did not select
slower-growing trees. In Itasca State Park, infested red pines showed no
evidence of declining growth when compared uninfested trees in the years
preceding infestations. In Lower Michigan, the pine shoot beetle causes minimal damage to red pine
shoots. Damage caused by the pine shoot beetle at 2
sites (northern Lower Michigan and southwestern Lower Michigan) from 1997 to 1999 ranged from 0.82 to 1.18
red pine shoots/m² in the north to 0.21 to 0.70 red pine shoots/m² in the southwest, where
the pine shoot beetle is less established [249].


Needle droop:
Red pine, particularly planted stock, is susceptible to needle droop. This occurs if sudden and excessive rapid
transpiration occurs when there is limited soil moisture. Succulent
tissues in the needle base collapse, which causes the needles to droop. Needle
droop can cause mortality or deformation to large numbers of red pine seedlings [136].


Pest management:
A pest management (insects, disease, and abiotic factors) analysis in red pine forests of
Wisconsin is available from Schmoldt [240].


Red pine plantations:
There is a plethora of information pertaining to
red pine plantations. Topics include growth and development [35,211,219,300,311,312], stocking rates [211,219],
fertilization [8,108], thinning and harvesting [21,63,88], establishing a plantation [204],
site quality [304], growth with other species [312], and insect/fungal infestations [84,153].


Salt tolerance:
Red pine seedlings have limited tolerance to sodium chloride spray [282].



Wildlife management:
Guidelines for managing wildlife habitat in red pine and eastern white pine forests of central Ontario are available [197].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Other uses and values

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the term: fuel

Red pine is used as an ornamental [80].

Wood products:
Red pine is a very important source of wood products [14,80,88,89]. It is used for lumber,
pilings, poles, cabin logs, railway ties, posts, mine timbers, box boards,
pulpwood, and fuel [22,89,231,252].
For more information on red pine and its importance in the wood industry, see
the following articles: [22,85,88,89,99,205,231,252,253]


Fire-killed red pine:
Basham [18] examines the deterioration of red pine by
fungi following fire mortality in the Mississagi-Chapleau area of Ontario.
Studies have also found that fire-killed, merchantable red pine is susceptible to beetle attacks [210].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Phenology

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info on this topic.

More info for the terms: cone, phenology, seed, tree

A flush of new red pine needles begins in early April to
mid-May, and needles complete growth by late summer [187,231,266]. Red pine cone
production begins during May and June [80,156,266], pollination
occurs from late May to mid-July [252], and second-year cones ripen from
August to October [156,243,266]. Growth of cone primordia occurs
throughout fall and winter [166].

Seed dispersal generally occurs a few days after ripening (mid-August to
October) and continues throughout fall and into the next spring. Most seeds are
dispersed within a month of ripening, with a few seeds remaining on the
tree for 2 to 3 years [252,266]. Red pine cones open and disperse seeds best on
warm autumn days [4,231,266].


At Stephentown, New York, the growing period for a 5-year-old seedling ranged from 45 to 63 days
over 5 years, beginning near the end of April and ending about the
end of June [60]. At the same location, Cook [61] observed the growth
period for a 7-foot-tall (2 m) red pine during 1940. Growth began on 7 May and
ended 7 July, for a total of 61 days. During the growing period, the red pine
tree increased in height by 17.5 inches (44.4 cm) [61].



Seedling root development:
The seasonal root development of 2- to 3-year-old red pine seedlings was
observed near Syracuse, New York, for 1 year [314]. The study began in January, when
the roots were dormant. Roots remained dormant until late April or early May.
Root growth began approximately a week before separation of the bud scales in
the terminal leader of the shoot. The peak of spring root growth occurred
during June, followed by a slow period of growth in July and August
when soil moisture was decreased. Root growth increased again in late summer or
early fall, depending upon soil moisture conditions. Root growth phenology of 20- to
30-year-old trees was similar to that of seedling root growth [314].


license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Plant Response to Fire

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: seed, tree

Many authors describe red pine as fire-dependent [28,94,127,128,129,130].
It regenerates following fire by seed from crown-stored cones or seeds
dispersed from off-site sources [4,22,80,89,96,166,187,230,231,266]. However,
red pine seeds are generally dispersed within a radius equal to the height of the seed
tree [4,252,266]; with a maximum dispersal range of 900 to 1,000 feet (275-300
m) [252], and a likely dispersal distance of about 40 feet (12 m) [231]. Thus,
regeneration is probably most likely to occur from crown-stored cones not
damaged by fire. Successful red pine
germination and seedling establishment requires little vegetative "competition",
adequate light, and a mineral soil base [4,27,94,214,231,252,288].
Seeds generally germinate several years after fire when ash minerals have been
reduced by leaching [4]. Peaks in red pine regeneration generally
occur in the years following fire [4,15,27,28,89,288]. Given that red pines
only produce "good" seed crops
every 3 to 7 years [4,27,89,166,187,231,252] and "bumper" crops every 10 to 12 years
[4,22,231,252], red pine regeneration
may be delayed following fire depending on the seed crop size.

Fire not only promotes red pine seedling establishment, but can promote
root/shoot growth in surviving trees [180] and an increase in resin flow [171,236].
Increased resin flow helps stop bark beetles and wood-decaying fungi from entering fire scars
[11,236,294].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Post-fire Regeneration

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: adventitious, crown residual colonizer, initial off-site colonizer, secondary colonizer, seed, tree

POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY [265]:




Tree without adventitious bud/root crown
Crown residual colonizer (on site, initial community)
Initial off-site colonizer (off site, initial community)
Secondary colonizer (on- or off-site seed sources)
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Regeneration Processes

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the terms: association, basal area, competition, cone, cover, density, fern, forest, fresh, litter, monoecious, natural, prescribed fire, radicle, root crown, seed, seed tree, tree

Red pine regenerates via seeds [4,22,80,89,96,166,187,230,231,266].

Pollination:
Red pine is wind- and self-pollinated [46,98]. Self-pollination is restricted by several factors, most
important of which is the position of male and female cones in the tree crown.
Female cones are generally found in the upper crown and male cones in the
lower crown [98]. In closed red pine stands self-pollination probably does not exceed
10%, but the percent of trees that self-pollinate in small isolated stands or in
single isolated trees is likely greater (review by [98]), [266]. Butson and others [46] state
that red pine has a high degree of self-fertility, which assures viable seed
production even when trees are isolated.



Breeding system:
Red pine is monoecious
[98,231,252,266]. Male and female cones generally occur on different branches. Male
cones develop at the base of the current year's growth and are tiny and
short-lived. Female cones develop in the middle third of the crown in "younger"
trees and the upper third of the crown in "older" trees. Red pine, while having a wide
geographic distribution, has very low genetic diversity [164,231,303].

Seed production:
Under "favorable" growing conditions, red pines produce female cones at age
5 and male cones at age 9 [231].
Red pines produce "good" seed crops at intervals of 3 to 7 years, with
"light" crops in most intervening years [4,27,89,166,187,231,252]. Bumper crops occur
about every 10 to 12 years [4,22,231,252]. Bumper crop densities of up to
865,000 seeds/ha have been reported in eastern Canada [187], and as many as
2,263,400 viable seeds/ha have been found in the Great Lakes States [266].

Less than half the ovules in a red pine cone are capable of developing into
seeds. Ovules are found in the central part of the cone and numbers range from
30 to 110 (x=60-90)
depending upon cone length and number of scales [231,266].
Cones mature in their second year of growth
[80,89,96,252]. In a "good" seed year,
trees produce a mean of 45 seeds, with approximately 20 viable seeds/cone; each
tree produces 50 to 200 cones or about 1,000 to
4,000 viable seeds/tree [231,252]. Red pine cone
production increases as stand density decreases [231].

Factors influencing cone/seed production:
Red pine may begin producing viable seeds at 12 to 60 years of age [4,57,82,89,129,130,187,231,266,320].
Optimum seed-bearing age ranges from 50 to 150 years [187]. Stiell
[266] found that a high number of seed-producing cones occurred in the upper crown and
on main branch terminals at Petawawa National Research Forest, Ontario, and
Rudolf [231] stated in a review that cone production is highest on
branches that are young, thick, long, and on the south side of the tree.
Above-normal temperatures in April, July, August, and September may also favor cone
and seed production 2 years later [231].

On Black Island in Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba, red pine cone production was
significantly (P<0.05) positively correlated with
tree diameter (R²=0.66),
total basal area (R²=0.62),
and crown area (R²=0.46). Multiple
regression showed the best predictors of cone production were tree diameter and
mean distance to neighboring trees. Thus, more cones were produced by large
trees growing in an open environment. Further, seed characteristics (number of
seeds/cone, mean and total seed mass/cone, and seed size) were
significantly positively correlated with cone characteristics
(length, diameter, area, and fresh mass, P<0.05). Cone diameter was the cone size
variable most strongly correlated with total number (R²=0.73) and
mass of seeds/cone (R²=0.80) [270]. Dickmann and Kozlowski [71] sampled cones from 25- to
30-year-old red pines in Wisconsin. They found a positive
association between cone volume and seeds/cone and between number of seeds/cone and scales/cone [71].

Cone predation:
In northern Wisconsin, cones on 105
red pines were studied from 1952 to 1966 [166]. A high proportion of the cones
were killed, largely by insects, in all years except
the years of heaviest cone production (1954, 1957, 1960, 1963, and 1965). On
average, approximately 60% of first-year cones did not survive into their second
year [166]. In the Great Lakes States, losses
of 20% to 100% of the cone crop have been attributed to
red pine cone beetles. Red pine cone moth and red pine coneworm, the other 2 insects that
most commonly destroy red pine cones, can cause
similar losses when their damage is combined [193].

Seed dispersal:
Red pine seeds are wind-dispersed [111,129,130,266], generally within a radius equal to the height of
the seed tree [4,252,266]. The maximum
dispersal range is from 900 to 1,000 feet (275-300 m) [252],
with a usual dispersal distance of about 40 feet (12 m) [231]. A few seed-bearing
cones may stay in the crown for 2 to 3 years [252,266].

The distance of red pine seedlings from seed trees was measured in Cass and
Itasca counties, Minnesota. Seedling density lowered with distance from seed
trees [88]:

Red pine seedling establishment by distance from seed
trees [88]


Distance Approximate seedling density
20 feet 500/acre
40 feet 400/acre
60 feet 160/acre
80 feet 75/acre
100 feet 50/acre

Seed banking:
Studies of red pine seed banking were few as of 2008. Ahlgren [5] studied red
pine seed banking in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. He claimed that
red pine seeds may remain viable in the soil for at least 10 years. In the
Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Ahlgren extracted red pine seeds from the soil in an area undisturbed for at least
200 years. Seeds were gathered from surface litter to a depth of 1 inch (2.5 cm)
and germinated in the greenhouse. Forty-five red pine seeds were
procured from a 100-foot² (10-m²) plot, and of those seeds 0% germinated [5].
Two studies state that if rainfall is "deficient", red pine seeds can remain viable for 1 to 3
years before germinating [231,252].

Germination:
Red pine prefers a nearly-exposed mineral soil seedbed for germination, which is
best prepared by fire [4,11,57,89,94,150,231,252]. Red pine
seeds do not have dormancy requirements [266], and seed viability is
variable, ranging from 14% to 65% in the field [252]. Germination occurs close to the soil surface and
is best when seeds are covered with a "light"
amount of soil [231].

Light:
Shade is beneficial for red pine germination. Seeds
may germinate on recent burns with a heavy ash cover,
heavy litter or sod, or under dense brush, but shade inhibits growth as
seedlings age [45,231,252,266]. Germination is inhibited by
full sunlight for 4 or more hours a day [231].

Red pine seed germination may not be hampered by
postfire growth of other vegetation [279]. Two weeks following an 18 June
1981 low-severity prescribed fire, red pine seeds were sown in plots with and
without postfire vegetation at Acadia Forest Experiment Station near
Fredericton, New Brunswick. Following burning, 2.7 inches (6.8 cm) of organic matter was
left and western bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) and sheep-laurel (Kalmia angustifolia) began sprouting
within 7 days. At the end of the growing season (14 weeks after burning), red
pine seed germination was 19.9% (SE 4.80) on sites without western bracken fern and
sheep-laurel and 17.1% (SE 5.54) on sites with them [279].

Seed size:
Red pine seed mass may have a positive influence on germination success. Sutton and others [270] collected seeds
from red pines on Black Island in
Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba. After 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30
days in the greenhouse, mean germination rates were 0.02%, 53.61%, 89.04%, 89.72%, 90.58%, and
90.92%, respectively. Red pine mean seed mass (R²=0.58)
and total seed mass (R²=0.37) were significantly (P<0.05)
positively correlated with germination success after 30 days [270].

Soil and moisture:
Red pine prefers a nearly-exposed mineral soil
seedbed for germination [4,11,57,94,150,231,252]. Germination is reduced at a
soil pH of 8.5 or higher [231]. Moist soil is necessary for red pine
germination, which occurs in late spring or early summer [266]. In Minnesota,
germination only occurred with mean rainfall of more than 4 inches (100 mm) for
May, June, and July. If rainfall is "deficient", seeds may remain viable for 1 to 3
years before germinating [231,252].

Temperature:
Red pine germination is best under warm
spring and early summer conditions ranging from 61 °F (16 °C) to 86 °F (30 °C) [167,231,252,266].
Seeds may germinate under
warm fall conditions, but seedlings do not survive through winter [167]. High
temperatures that occur on fire-blackened soil surfaces for the first few years
after fire are not conducive to germination, and if germination does occur,
lethal to small seedlings [4,252].

In a greenhouse experiment, mean red pine seed germination was 75%.
Red pine seed germination began on day 7 and concluded on day 25 of the
30-day experiment [156].

Seedling establishment/growth:
Although red pine germination may not be hampered by other vegetation, successful seedling establishment
generally requires little vegetative "competition", adequate
light, and mineral soil best prepared by fire [4,231,252,288]. A single red pine
seedling growing on Rensselaer Grit Plateau, New York, grew most in a year when
the winter was the coldest on record and precipitation was 156% of average [60].
For roughly the first 4 years, red pine seedlings grow less than
10 inches (25 cm) a year. The growth rate increases to 12 to 24 inches (30-60 cm)
a year for the next 10 to 20 years [48,252]. Under shaded conditions, it may take a seedling 15
years to reach breast height [48]. Radial growth in red pine may occur for at
least 200 years [252].

Allelopathy/leachate:
The release of chemicals by certain understory plants in red pine
communities may affect the growth of red pine seedlings. In a Wisconsin plantation, water
extracts of leaves from black cherry (Prunus serotina), red raspberry (Rubus

idaeus), bigleaf aster (Eurybia macrophylla), Tatarian honeysuckle (Lonicera
tatarica), climbing nightshade (Solanum dulcamara), and giant
goldenrod (Solidago gigantea) reduced red pine height growth,
number of secondary needle fascicles, weight increments of roots and shoots, and radicle
elongation of red pine seedlings [200]. Laboratory results may differ from
the effects of natural concentrations of plant chemicals occurring in the field.

Leachate from red pine and sheep-laurel litter significantly reduced growth
of red pine seedlings in sand compared to seedlings growing in burned-over mineral soil
[180]. Red pine seedlings were grown for 8 months in sand,
sand watered with either red pine or
sheep-laurel leachate, and burned-over mineral soil. The leachate experiments might have mimicked red pine
seedling growth in red pine or sheep-laurel litter. After 8 months, red
pine seedlings grew significantly better in the burned-over soil than in the other
3 treatments. There were no significant differences in growth between seedlings exposed
to sheep-laurel leachate and those exposed to red pine leachate, though
seedlings in the sand without leachate grew significantly better than seedlings exposed
to leachate [180].



Growth of red pine seedlings in sand, burned-over soil, and sand
watered with either red
pine or sheep-laurel leachate [180]
Treatment
Average plant height (cm)
Initial planting 8 months later
Sand 6.0a 11.7b
Sand with sheep-laurel leachate 5.7a 9.6c
Sand with red pine leachate 5.8a 11.3bc
Burned-over soil 6.2a 14.1a
Values within a column followed by different
letters are significantly different (P≤0.05).

Fire:
Fire is very important in creating the conditions necessary for red pine seedling establishment
(an exposed mineral soil and little vegetation). Removing the organic layer
and exposing mineral soil requires a moderate to severe fire [94,288].
Red pine seedling growth is inhibited following fires that leave a thick ash layer [252]. Low-severity surface fires
do not promote red pine seedling recruitment
because they do not expose mineral soil. Seedling establishment requires local flare-ups
that remove patches of vegetation, creating a mosaic of even-aged patches [147].
Given that red pine produces "good" seed crops every
3 to 7 years and bumper crops every 10 to 12 years (see Seed production),
the probability of good seed years coinciding with desirable postfire seedbeds
is low, making adequate postfire seedling establishment infrequent
[4]. Red pine needs about 3 postfire years without
"competing" vegetation to dominate a site [4].

In a controlled experiment, red pine seedling emergence was high with
high soil moisture, low soil organic matter content, and shade,
but low on ash substrates [135]. The researchers
collected soil monoliths within a jack pine-red pine-eastern white pine
community from the Great Lakes-St Lawrence Forest. Soil was taken to a
laboratory and subjected to 4 organic horizon removal treatments (100%, 75%,
50%, and 25% organic horizon removed). The monoliths were then burned,
subjected to 4 ash removal treatments (100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% ash layer removed), and seeded
to red pine. Following seeding, the
monoliths were moved to a greenhouse and subjected to 4 watering regimes (100%,
75%, 50%, and 25% of average daily June rainfall) and 4 shading regimes (100%,
75%, 50%, and 25% of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)). Bar graphs
show the effect of organic horizon removal with and without ash under the 75%
and 100% water regime and the 4 shading regimes [135].

Red pine seedling establishment on a burned site was much greater than on an
unburned site in Newfoundland [180]. Both sites were on dry,
sandy soil and approximately 14 miles (22 km) apart. The organic matter
depth was apparently the most important factor controlling seedling establishment. As organic
matter deepened, seedling establishment was reduced [180]. Time between the July 1979 fire and red pine seedling
measurements was not provided. Presumably, since red pine
only produces good seed crops every 3 to 7 years and the age of seedlings on the
burned site ranged from 2.4 to 2.9 years, the study was conducted 6 to 10
years after fire.

Red pine seedling establishment
characteristics on burned and unburned sites in Newfoundland [180]
Treatment and

parameters
Distance from seed-bearing trees (m)
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-5
Burned
Number of seedlings 19 45 28 8
Age (yrs) 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.9
Height (cm) 18.9 14.9 12.5 16.6
Organic matter depth (cm) 2.0 2.1 2.6 2.8
Unburned
Number of seedlings 0 2 2 7
Age (yrs) --- 2.5 3.0 3.9
Height (cm) --- 13.5 19.0 16.8
Organic matter depth (cm) --- 4.0 5.0 2.7

Establishment in an undisturbed forest:
Red pine seedlings generally establish after fire prepares a mineral seedbed.
However, on the shore of Basswood Lake, Ontario, Ahlgren [4] found seedlings,
saplings, and mature, seed-producing red pine growing in a
200-year-old undisturbed red pine forest. Thus, seedling establishment may occur
in the absence of fire.

Average number of red pine seedlings,
saplings, and seed-producing trees in a 200-year-old undisturbed red
pine forest [4]
Years since disturbance Seedlings/acre Average seedling

age (years) Average seedling height (feet) Saplings/acre Seed-producing trees/acre
200 891 8 2.0 344 74
205 608 9 2.0 362 54


Growth with associated vegetation, light, shading:

Shade provided by associated vegetation is beneficial for germination and early survival
of red pine seedlings but inhibits growth as seedlings age [28,45,149,252].
Root penetration by red pine is generally slower than that of associated vegetation; thus,
red pine seedlings may be less tolerant of competition [231,252].

Red pine seedling growth is reduced by beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta subsp. cornuta) and American hazelnut (C. americana) [268].
During a 2-year study, 100% of red pine
seedlings growing without hazelnut cover survived, but only 62% survived with
hazelnut. Red pine seedlings grew an average of 5.9 inches (15 cm) when not
shaded and 2 inches (4 cm) when shaded by hazelnut during year 2 of the study.
At the end of the study, seedlings growing with hazelnut averaged 1.9 g (SD
0.9) dry weight, while seedlings growing without
hazelnut averaged 7.0 g (SD  2.8) dry weight. The researcher notes that while both shading and
moisture competition affected red pine seedlings growing with hazelnut, shading
was the most important factor. Moisture levels were not directly measured, but it
was assumed that seedlings that were trenched and watered received more moisture
than untrenched, unwatered control seedlings [268].

On the Chippewa National Forest, Minnesota, Shirley [246]
found that red pine seedlings grew poorly in an undisturbed 43-year-old quaking aspen stand. In 1931,
2-year-old red pine seedlings were planted in quaking aspen stands that had
either been left undisturbed or had their understory removed mechanically. By 1934,
red pine seedling mortality in the undisturbed plot was 60.7%, while mortality was only 9.7% in
the understory removal plot [246].

Red pine seedlings grow better without than with
other vegetation north of Sault Ste Marie, Ontario [302]. Following clearcutting of a
forest site, red pine seedlings (mean height=3.6 inches (9.2 cm), mean stem diameter=3.1 mm)
were planted in plots with naturally-occurring vegetation (western bracken fern,
false melic (Schizachne purpurascens), roughleaf ricegrass (Oryzopsis
asperifolia), violets (Viola spp.), and low sweet blueberry) either
removed annually by herbicides or left untreated. At the end of 5 years, red
pine seedling survival, height, stem diameter, stem volume, and survival rate
were greatest on sites where associated vegetation was controlled [302].

Red pine seedling characteristics on sites with
and without other vegetation [302]


  With vegetation Without vegetation
Survival (%) 53 62
Height (cm) 76.6 97.8
Stem diameter (mm) 1.95 3.72
Stem volume index (cm³) 400.1 1,792.8


Height, stem diameter, and stem
volume were significantly lower on sites with than sites without vegetation
(P<0.05).

Red pine seedlings grow best in full sunlight. In an experiment,
Logan [170] grew red pine seedlings in reduced to full sunlight gradients for 4 to 6 years.
Growth and biomass gains increased with
increasing sunlight [170].

Growth characteristics for red pine seedlings grown in
4 levels of lights for 4 to 6 years [170]


Growth characteristic
Light level (percentage of
full sunlight)
13%
25%
45%
100%
Height (inches)1 6 12 15 16
Shoot weight (g)2 1.4 4.4 12.1 23.5
Foliage weight (g)3 4.3 23.8 84.5 198.1
Branch weight (g)3 0.2 2.7 19.3 58.3
Stem weight (g)3 1.2 7.5 25.3 56.3
Root weight (g)2 0.6 1.7 7.1 14.9
Needle length (inches)1 3.2 4.1 3.9 3.9
Leader diameter (mm)1 2.3 3.8 4.9 5.9
Root crown diameter (mm)4 4.2 8.6 14.8 22.5

1Following 5 years of growth;
2oven dry weight following 4 years of growth;
3oven dry weight following 6 years of growth;
4following 6 years of growth.

Shirley [246] conducted a similar study on the Chippewa National Forest,
Minnesota, from 1931 to 1934. As with the above study,
red pine seedlings performed better with increasing amounts of sunlight [246].

Despite its need for sunlight, red pine apparently does not require an open
stand structure. Red pine sapling height was positively correlated with density
on the Chippewa National Forest (r=0.609)
[247]. On plots where red pine saplings were spaced approximately 20 Ã 20 feet (6 Ã 6 m) apart, average height was 5.5
feet (1.7 m), while saplings spaced as close as 5 Ã 5 feet (2 Ã 2 m) apart,
average height was 14 feet (4.3 m). Further analysis showed that trees of the
same height grew more rapidly during the following 10 years if they were
located within 5 feet (2 m) of another tree than trees spaced more than 5 feet
(2 m) apart [247].



Heat tolerance:
Red pine seedlings are susceptible to heat mortality [175,245]. Red pine heat tolerance was
investigated using 1- to 4-year-old seedlings exposed
to various temperatures for 1 to 30 minutes. Following the heat treatments,
percent red pine seedling cell mortality was measured. Cell mortality began at
133 °F (56 °C) exposure for 30 minutes. The maximum temperature that 100% of
cells survived was 140 °F (61 °C) for 1 minute [175]. In a nursery, Shirley [245] investigated lethal
temperatures to buds, needles, stems, and roots of red pine seedlings. At 2 hours of exposure, buds, needles, and stems
were all killed at temperatures of 119 to 124 °F (48.2-51.3 °C). Root mortality
occurred at 114 to 123 °F (45.7-50.3 °C). Lethal temperatures were similar but
slightly lower for buds, needles, and stems after 5 hours of exposure [245].

Height growth:
Red pine grows optimally where it receives at least 6 hours of direct sunlight daily. Red pine growth is "very
uniform". Under favorable conditions, it increases in height approximately
10 inches (30 cm) a year for the first 60 years. Maximum height is usually
attained by 60 to 120 years of age [252].

Seedling facilitation:
Northern red oaks on a stable dune system by Lake Huron, Ontario,
facilitated establishment and growth of red and eastern white pine seedlings [149].
In a comparison of open areas and stands
of northern red oak older than 35 years, densities of eastern white pine and red pine
juveniles were over 6 times greater under northern red oak than in open areas (P<0.001).
Further, average pine stem density was significantly greater beneath the
northern halves of northern red oak canopies (1.00 stems/m², SD 
0.07) than under the southern halves (0.33
stem/m², SD  0.30) (P<0.01) [149].

Shoot/root growth:
Old needles (>1 year) provide 80% or more of carbohydrate reserves used to
support new shoot growth. Branches, main stem,
and roots, in that order, provide the other major sources of carbohydrate reserves
for shoot growth [155,311].

Red pine has 2 primary periods of root growth: the 1st occurs in spring and
early summer, the 2nd in early fall [252,266]. Roots develop best in loose
soil and worst in soils that are saturated, compacted, and/or
coarse-textured or are strongly stratified,
fine, and/or overlay coarse-textured soils [252]. Root development is fostered by a water
table within 3.9 feet (1.2 m) of the soil surface [231]. Mortality
occurs if roots are in soils saturated for more than 3 months [231]. Red
pine roots can grow around stones and penetrate cracks in bedrock on shallow
soils. Root size increases the first 15 years of life; afterwards, root density
increases [252].

Red pine germination did not differ by soil type, but root and shoot growth was significantly
better in sand than in organic matter or Ae horizon soil.
Red pine primary root and shoot lengths were measured 3 weeks after germination [180].

Effect of forest floor substrates on
red pine root and shoot growth [180]
Substrate type

Length (mm)


Root Shoot
Sand 15.6a 50.3a
Organic matter 0.50c 27.5b
Ae horizon 5.5b 26.1b

Values within a column followed by different
letters are significantly different (P≤0.05).

Soil/moisture:
Red pine seedlings grow best in sand to sandy loam soil [167] that has good moisture retention,
is well aerated, has high cation exchange capacity, and pH ranging from 5.1 to 5.5 [231,252].
Seedlings perform poorly on calcareous soils [252]. While preferring moist soil, red pine seedlings have been found growing
on dry, nutrient-poor sites in Itasca State Park [158].

Seedling mortality:
Young seedlings are susceptible to drought, insolation, freezing temperatures, flooding, and rodent
browsing [167,252,266].

Vegetative regeneration:
Red pine does not regenerate vegetatively [231,252].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Successional Status

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info on this topic.

More info for the terms: basal area, climax, codominant, cover, fire exclusion, fire frequency, forest, frequency, hardwood, herbaceous, mesic, natural, seed, succession, tree, xeric



Red pine is shade intolerant and occurs in even-aged stands. It often succeeds its
less shade-tolerant and shorter-lived associates such as jack pine, paper birch,
and aspens and is succeeded by more shade-tolerant species such as eastern white
pine, white spruce, and balsam fir [23]. In a virgin red pine forest on the Chippewa National Forest, Minnesota,
red pines grow better with increasing amounts of sunlight [244]. Little
anthropogenic disturbance has occurred in the forest, where the average red pine
age is 200 years, and average height is 90 feet (30 m). Where 20% sunlight
is available, there is an average of 2 red pines/milacre. At 50% sunlight,
there is an average of 7 red pines/milacre, increasing to a maximum
abundance of approximately 17 red pines/milacre at roughly 92% of full
sunlight. Sunlight intensity has nearly the same effect on mean annual height
growth of young red pine saplings and mature trees. Mean annual growth increases from
approximately 1 inch (3 cm)/year at 10% of full sunlight to about 6 inches (18
cm)/year with 95% of full sunlight [244]. For further information, see Growth with associated vegetation, light, shading.

Early succession:
Red pine is often an early successional species throughout its range.
It is an early and late successional or "subclimax" species on sand
dunes near Lake Michigan. In Wilderness State Park along the shore of Lake
Michigan, red pine stands begin to develop when dunes are approximately 145
years old. Red pine stands dominate dunes carbon dated to 345, 400, 1,975, and
2,375 years old. Red pine cover is greatest on the oldest (2,375) dune
formations [168]. Red pine is a seral species in the sand
ridge region along Lake Michigan, occurring in the early-successional pine-oak (Quercus
spp.) stage. The pine-oak stage is preceded
only by an herbaceous stage formed on unstable sand dunes. Eastern white pine and
red pine likely remain through late succession [306,307].

In the Great Lakes region in the upland boreal and boreal
conifer-hardwood forests, red pine, paper birch, Populus spp., jack pine,
and eastern white pine are considered the most important species in
early-successional habitats with low moisture and abundant light [184].

Fire:
Fire plays the greatest role in the
succession of red pine. Since red pine depends on fire to create the conditions
necessary for establishment, it occurs as a postfire pioneer species
[77,181]. Red pine is often considered a "fire-maintained climax"
species [11,79,109,190,261]. Red pine is eventually replaced in the absence of fire.
In the south of its range it is eventually replaced by hardwood species and by
shade-tolerant conifers in boreal forests [31]. In the Great Lake States,
succession may be from jack pine to red pine to eastern
white pine and finally to northern hardwoods. On infertile, sandy sites,
succession may end before hardwoods establish, and red pine may persist at a subclimax
stage. In the eastern portion of its range, red pine may be a successional stage
in a spruce-fir or eastern hemlock climax, rather than a northern hardwoods
climax [48]. At red pine's northern limit in the southern boreal forests,
frequent severe fires discourage red pine establishment by killing trees before
they reach seed-bearing age and favor jack pine and black spruce [30,230].

The successional trend of red pine's replacement by other less fire-tolerant
species is well established. The table below provides more regionally
and/or species-specific information on this process. In
all cases, red pine was one of the primary early-seral tree species.

Red pine succession in the absence of fire by
region


Location/site characteristics Red pine's replacements Time to  displacement Other notes
northern Minnesota balsam fir, birch (Betula spp.)-aspen, fir-spruce (Picea
spp.)-birch, or maple-basswood not given [142,148] ---
Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota black spruce 400-450 years [127,128] ---
Great Lakes-St Lawrence white spruce, balsam fir, paper birch, black spruce,
northern white-cedar, and red maple 300-400 years red pine still dominant after 300 to 400 years, and
replacements are still in understory [130,252]
Acadia National Park, Maine red spruce not given fire exclusion considered the cause of decreased red pine
abundance [212]
Lake Duparquet, southwestern Quebec; xeric sites along lake
shores northern white-cedar, black spruce not given [16] ---
southern Ontario white birch, balsam fir, black spruce not given [217] ---

Late-seral forests/logging:
Aggressive logging combined with reduction in the natural fire
frequency with European settlement led to a decrease in red pine abundance in
the Great Lakes States. Several authors noted that logging
and repeated slash burning in the mid- to late 1800s
"virtually eliminated" red pine [10,122,130,163,173,209,298,299].
Nearly complete removal of mature seed-bearing trees stifled regeneration [173,209].

Red pine-eastern white pine
forests comprised 97,703,000 acres (39,539,000 ha) in 1850 just prior to
settlement; in 1995, red pine-eastern white pine forests were found on only
20,500,000 acres (8,310,000 ha) [101]. There were approximately 509,000 acres
(206,000 ha) of old-growth, late seral red pine-eastern white pine forests in the Great
Lake States in the 1980s and 1990s. An estimated 9,600,000 acres (3,900,000 ha)
were old-growth, late seral red pine-eastern white pine forests up to 8,000 years before
settlement. The researcher claimed that reduced fire frequency was as much to
blame for the decrease in red pine cover as overlogging [100]. In northern
Minnesota in the late 1800s, red pine was codominant to dominant on
8.3% to 16.6% of forests. Dominance or codominance decreased to 0.79% to 3.56% in 1990. In northern Minnesota
forests, logging has replaced fire as the major disturbance, causing a successional shift
to hardwoods [102].

If an adequate seed source is readily available, red pine may establish after
logging. Logging can expose mineral soil, creating favorable seedbed conditions
for red pine [4,152]. Red pine seedlings
probably establish when mature red pine areas are logged soon after a good
seed crop develops, and logging is followed by slash burning. In northern
Michigan, red pine sites heavily logged and burned contain red pine seedlings
and saplings, but nevertheless juvenile red pines may be "outcompeted" by white oak,
northern pin oak, northern red oak, black oak, and scarlet oak [152].

With a seed source, red pine can spread into logged areas. Near Found Lake in northeastern Wisconsin, large
tracts of eastern white pine and red pine were logged from 1890 to 1894, and
slash burning occurred from 1894 to 1897. For about 80 years following logging and
burning, white birch, bigtooth aspen, and quaking aspen dominated the sites. Some
red pines in isolated pockets were not logged. Red pine is now reclaiming dominance in some
areas. Basal area of red pines with a DBH of 4 inches (10 cm) or greater
increased from 2.99 m²/ha in 1950 to 10.1 m²/ha in 1997 [264].

Following settlement, red pine stands in the
Great Lakes States were clearcut or cut leaving 1 to 8 seed trees/acre. On mesic sites other vegetation, particularly
beaked hazelnut and balsam fir, interferes with red
pine establishment. The average age of red pine stands has declined
from an average of 230 years during the presettlement period to 72
years (review by [79]).
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Taxonomy

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
The scientific name of red pine is Pinus resinosa Ait. (Pinaceae)
[34,52,80,89,96,107,146,157,267,301].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Value for rehabilitation of disturbed sites

provided by Fire Effects Information System Plants
More info for the term: seed

Red pine has been successfully used to rehabilitate disturbed sites
[13,121,139,169,194,223,241,295,316] and is useful for windbreaks, snowbreaks,
and watershed protection [89].

Seed storage:
Red pine seeds can be stored for up to 30 years if kept in a dry, sealed container at
temperatures of 30 to 40 °F (1-3 °C) [305].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Hauser, A. Scott. 2008. Pinus resinosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Associated Forest Cover

provided by Silvics of North America
In parts of the northern Lake States, Ontario, and Quebec, red pine grows in extensive pure stands and in the Northeast and eastern Canada in small pure stands. More often it is found with jack pine (Pinus banksiana), eastern white pine (P. strobus), or both. It is a common component in three forest cover types: Red Pine (Society of American Foresters Type 15), Jack Pine (Type 1), and Eastern White Pine (Type 21) and is an occasional associate in one, Northern Pin Oak (Type 14) (26,90).

On the coarser, drier soils, common associates of red pine are jack pine, quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), bigtooth aspen (P. grandidentata), scrubby oaks (chiefly northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis)), and bear oak (Q. ilicifolia). On somewhat better soils (fine sands to loamy sands), in addition to the foregoing, associates may be eastern white pine, red maple (Acer rubrum), black cherry (Prunus serotina), northern red oak (Quercus rubra), white oak (Q. alba), chestnut oak (Q. prinus), balsam fir (Abies balsamea), black spruce (Picea mariana), and occasional specimens of the better hardwoods. On sandy loam and loam soils, red pine's associates include sugar maple (Acer saccharum), eastern white pine, American basswood (Tilia americana), red maple, balsam fir, paper birch (Betula papyrifera), yellow birch (B. alleghaniensis), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), northern red oak, eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), white spruce (Picea glauca), white ash (Fraxinus americana), red spruce (Picea rubens), northern white-cedar (Thuja occidentalis), and eastern hophornbeam (Ostrya virginiana). Growing with red pine in the West Virginia outlier are eastern white pine, pitch pine (Pinus rigida), Virginia pine (P. virginiana), table mountain pine (P. pungens), sweet birch (Betula lenta), northern red oak and bear oak. In northeastern Illinois the woody plant associates include northern red oak, white oak, American hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), hackberry (Celtis occidentalis), and roundleaf serviceberry (Amelanchier sanguinea). All the associates of red pine grow only as understory except eastern white pine and occasionally jack pine or aspen. When found with hardwoods, red pine usually is a minor but dominant component of the stand (76,87).

The most common shrubs associated with red pine include Canada blueberry (Vaccinium canadense), low sweet blueberry (V. angustifolium), sweetfern (Comptonia peregrina), common bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi), prairie willow (Salix humilis), American hazel (Corylus americana), beaked hazel (C. cornuta), striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum), dwarf bush-honeysuckle (Diervilla lonicera), New Jersey tea (Ceanothus americanus), sand cherry (Prunus pumila and P. susquehanae), fly honeysuckle (Lonicera canadensis), serviceberries (Amelanchier spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), trailing arbutus (Epigaea repens), and spireas (Spiraea spp.) (26,76,87).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Climate

provided by Silvics of North America
Red pine is native to areas with cool-to-warm summers, cold winters, and low to moderate precipitation. Within red pine's natural range the average January temperatures vary from -18° to -4° C (0° to 25° F) and the average July temperatures from 16° to 21° C (60° to 70° F). Average annual maximum temperatures range from 32° to 38° C (90° to 100° F), and average annual minimum temperatures range from -23° to -40° C (-10° to -40° F).

Average annual precipitation is from 510 to 1010 mm (20 to 40 in) throughout much of the range but reaches 1520 mm (60 in) in some eastern localities. The average growing season precipitation ranges from 380 to 640 mm (15 to 25 in), and the average annual snowfall ranges from 100 to 300 cm (40 to 120 in). Summer droughts of 30 or more days occur commonly in the western half of the range. The frost-free period ranges from 80 to 160 days, although it may be as short as 40 days northeast of Lake Superior in Ontario. The northern limit of red pine is related to length of frost-free period and closely parallels the 2° C (35° F) mean annual isotherm.

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Damaging Agents

provided by Silvics of North America
Although red pine has had fewer serious enemies than most associated species when growing under conditions natural to its native range, nevertheless it is damaged by a number of agents. When grown on less acid, finer textured, and more poorly drained soils and under milder climatic conditions than those to which it is adapted, red pine is subject to damage by additional destructive agents.

The following hinder red pine seed germination and early survival: summer drought and high surface soil temperatures; sudden drops in temperature in the early fall, prolonged for about 24 hours, and winter drying of foliage; unidentified insects that consume seedlings shortly after they germinate; competition of subordinate vegetation; post-emergent damping-off (usually caused by fungi of the genera Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Pythium, and Phytophthora), birds, rodents, flooding, trampling by large animals, and smothering by litter; and large doses of herbicides (29,76,90,94).

Beyond the early establishment stage red pine may be killed or seriously damaged by many physical and biotic environmental factors.

Fire may kill red pines in stands up to 21 m (69 ft) tall. Ice and sleet storms and very strong winds have caused serious breakage and windfall in red pine stands. Spray from de-icing salt (sodium chloride) along well traveled highways has caused red pine mortality and poor growth. Spring flooding for 20 days kills red pine (21,60,76,90,92,93,96).

About 100 insect species are known to feed on red pine, but only a few usually cause mortality or serious injury. Several sawflies (Neodiprion lecontei, N. sertifer, N. abbotii, N. nanalus, N. pratti pratti, N. compar, N. pinetum, Diprion frutetorum, D. similis, Acantholyda erythrocephala, A. pini, and A. zappei) defoliate and often kill seedlings, and some of them damage older trees also. Trees in young stands, especially plantations, may sustain mortality or serious injury from the Saratoga spittlebug (Aphrophora saratogensis), the Zimmerman pine moth (Dioryctria zimmermani), the red pine shoot moth (D. resinosella) or the Allegheny mound ant (Formica exsectoides). The red pine scale (Matsucoccus resinosae), especially in the Northeast, kills or severely injures red pines from seedlings to mature trees. The European pine shoot moth (Rhyaciona buoliana) frequently deforms young red pine. White grubs (such as Phyllophaga rugosa, P. tristis, Diplotaxis sordida, and Serica spp.) cut the roots of the seedlings and often induce mortality in dry years (10,34,75,76,102).

In periods of peak population, the snowshoe hare and the cottontail often kill or reduce height growth of red pine seedlings. When preferred foods are lacking, white-tailed deer browse or destroy red pine seedlings. Porcupines girdle red pines from sapling to mature trees (9,76).

The North American strain of scleroderris canker (Gremmeniella abietina) has caused the loss of a number of young plantations in the Lake States; in the Northeast, the European strain of scleroderris canker has killed mature red pine. Needle cast diseases can retard growth of red pine and kill small trees. These include Lophodermium pinastri and Scirrhia acicola. Sirococcus tip blight (Sirococcus strobilinus) can cause failure of natural regeneration when overstory trees are infected. Coleosporium asterum stunts the growth of new shoots while sweetfern blister rust (Cronartium comptoniae) deforms young trees. In nurseries, Cylindrocladium scoparium occasionally causes severe losses through root rot, damping off-, and needle blight, and annosus root rot (Heterobasidion annosum) and the shoestring root rot (Armillaria mellea) cause death of trees in planted and natural stands (7,39,63,65,68,76,82, 83,90).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Flowering and Fruiting

provided by Silvics of North America
Red pine is monoecious; the flowers appear between April and June. The female flowers, 2 to 4 mm (0.1 to 0.2 in) long, are borne mostly in the middle third of the crown (in the upper third in older trees), and the purple male flowers, 10 to 20 mm (0.4 to 0.8 in) long, are borne in the lower crown. In Ontario and northern Minnesota, the cone first becomes visible in late May or early June, although the cone primordia are differentiated in June to August of the previous year. Pollination occurs during late May or early June when the cone is about 4 mm (0.2 in) long. By late summer the cone is 10 to 15 mm (0.4 to 0.6 in) long and stops growing for the season. Insects, weather extremes, and other damaging agents may cause the loss of 60 percent of the cones between the first and second year of their development. The remaining cones begin further growth the next spring, but actual fertilization does not take place until mid-July of the second year (13 months after pollination) when cone growth is completed and the fully developed seed coats have hardened. At that time the cone is 37 to 50 mm (1.5 to 2.0 in) long (37,52,56).

Seedfall begins at the time cones ripen and continues throughout the winter and into the next summer, although the bulk of it can be deferred by cool, wet weather (which retards cone opening). The heaviest and most viable seed falls the first month. From year to year, soundness of the dispersed seed varied from 14 to 86 percent in Michigan and Manitoba; it was highest in the best crop years (19,74,76,81).

Above-normal temperatures in April, July, August, and September, 2 years before cone maturity, favor cone production. Cone production is better on branches that are young, thick, long, and on the south side of the tree.

Many of the seeds are viable when the cones have become purple with reddish brown scale tips or have a specific gravity of about 0.80 to 0.94 (they float in kerosene), but they are not dispersed until the cones are completely brown (specific gravity about 0.60). The cones themselves usually fall the next spring or summer, although some may remain on the tree 2 or 3 years (37,52,57,76).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Genetics

provided by Silvics of North America
Red pine is uniform morphologically and apparently very old. Fossil records from Dakota sandstone show that an upland pine (Pinus clementsii or P. resinosipites or both) markedly resembling red pine occurred in southern Minnesota during the Cretaceous period. During periods of glaciation, red pine was forced to migrate to the south and then returned north with the retreat of the glaciers. Indications are that after the most recent glaciation red pine migrated west, principally north of Lake Michigan, from a refuge in the Appalachian Highlands (76,103).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Growth and Yield

provided by Silvics of North America
Cambial growth occurs as springwood cells during the period of active elongation and high auxin synthesis. Summerwood cells are produced following the cessation of terminal growth and consequent reduction in auxin synthesis. The transition from springwood to summerwood varies from season to season in timing and duration and from tree to tree but apparently is associated with seasonal depletion in soil moisture (76).

The amount and distribution of wood growth on the stem are determined largely by crown size and distributions (51).

For the first 50 years height growth on average sites in Minnesota averages about 30 cm (12 in) per year. Between 50 and 100 years the rate is more than 15 cm (6 in) per year. For the next 30 years the rate is only about 7.5 cm (3 in) per year. From 130 to 150 years it drops to 3 cm (1 in). After 150 years height growth almost stops, although diameter growth continues at a slow rate for several years longer. The oldest tree age recorded is 307 years although a tree estimated to be 400 years old was measured on the Chippewa National Forest in north-central Minnesota.

Normally, mature red pines are about 21 to 24 m (70 to 80 ft) tall, with d.b.h. up to 91 cm (36 in), although trees have attained 46 m (150 ft) in height and 152 cm (60 in) in d.b.h. (17,76).

Height growth reflects site quality and the amount of overhead shade or growth disruption, as by terminal feeding insects or other pests; it is greatest on the best sites and least on poor sites or those with a heavy overstory or severe pest damage (table 1). if red pines make up the overstory, the average height of dominant and codominant trees at 50 years (site index) is used to measure site quality. In northern Minnesota the site index ranges from about 14 m (45 ft) for poor sites to 23 m (75 ft) for very good sites (13,100). In southeastern Minnesota there are planted stands 26-37 years old with site indices of 27-29 m (90-95 ft) (Donald H. Prettyman, personal communication).

Table 1- Characteristics of unmanaged 140-year-old red pine stands on three sites in Minnesota Site Quality Item Good Medium Poor Average d.b.h., cm 39 33 27 Average ht. of dominants, m 32 27 20 Trees/ha 353 460 647 Basal area, m²/ha 43 41 38 Merchantable yield, m³/ha     Total¹ 514 371 248     Lumber² 387 244 138     Topwood and small trees 132 126 120 Average d.b.h., in 15.5 13.2 10.7 Average ht. of dominants, ft 104 88 67 Trees/acre 143 186 262 Basal area, ft²/acre 187 177 164 Merchantable yield     Total, ft³/acre¹ 7,350 5,300 3,550     Lumber, fbm/acre² 32,500 20,500 11,600     Topwood and small trees,       cords/acre
21
20
19 ¹Gross volume, excluding bark, of trees 12.7 cm (5 in) in d.b.h. and larger to a top
  diameter of 10.2 cm (4 in).
²Net volume of trees 20.3 cm (8 in) and larger in d.b.h., to a variable to diameter
  (minimum 15.2 cm (6 in) inside bark); volumes reduced by 15 percent for woods and
 mill cull. Diameter growth improves with increasing live crown size, which in turn is affected by stand density. The length of live crown in relation to total tree height ranges from 7 percent in dense stands to 75 percent in open stands (35,50,72,86,90).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Reaction to Competition

provided by Silvics of North America
Red pine is less shade tolerant than common associates other than jack pine, the aspens, paper birch, and gray birch (Betula populifolia). Based on a scale that ranges from 10.0 for eastern hemlock (extremely shade tolerant) to 0.7 for the aspens (extremely shade intolerant), red pine rates 2.4 along with black ash (Fraxinus nigra) and black cherry (Prunus serotina). Other classifications include red pine in the fourth lowest of five tolerance classes (intolerant). Red pine becomes more intolerant as the environment becomes warmer. Although seedlings may be more tolerant than older trees, they grow very slowly under cover.

Most natural red pine stands are understocked, but an occasional sapling stand may be dense with as many as 49,400 stems per hectare (20,000/acre). Stands 15 to 20 years old with fewer than 6,200 trees per hectare (2,500/acre) seem able to thin themselves, but denser stands stagnate. Dense stands respond well to thinning. To age 67 on an excellent site in Wisconsin, red pine has made full volume growth when thinned periodically from age 32, to an average spacing of 20 percent of height of dominants. Thinning was done after each 2.1 or 2.4 m (7 or 8 ft) of added height growth. Height growth of dominants was retarded after spacing became closer than 15 percent of height. The range of stand density for full volume growth remains to be determined. Although stand density is important in the control of size and quality of timber trees, red pine volume growth varies little over a wide range of stocking conditions (14 to 34 m²/ha or more basal area, or 60 to 150 ft²/acre). On good sites basal area growth ceases when it reaches a level of about 57 m²/ha (250 ft²/acre) (11,17,22,76,90,101).

Diameter growth begins earliest, is fastest, and continues longest in dominant trees. The reverse is true of suppressed trees. Overhead cover restricts height growth, but red pines overtopped by oaks and red maple for as long as 40 years have responded to release.

In dense stands dominance is well expressed by age 10 to 12. At wider spacing the differentiation into crown classes occurs later, usually after 20 or 30 years. In fully stocked stands the percentage of trees in the dominant and codominant crown classes increases from about 45, when average d.b.h. is 5 cm (2 in), to 90, when d.b.h. is 36 cm (14 in). In less dense stands the percentage of dominants and codominants is higher.

Beginning at about age 25 in dense stands, red pine prunes itself better than any other northern conifer except tamarack. Even in dense stands, however, there may be little natural pruning during the first 40 years. In more open stands pruning is delayed to a greater age. On some infertile sands, however, lower branches die off even if crowns are not closed.

In the absence of fire or other catastrophes, the ecological succession in the Lake States is from jack pine to red pine to white pine and finally to northern hardwoods; the rate of succession is likely to be more rapid on the better sites. On the coarser, more infertile sands, succession apparently stops short of the northern hardwood climax and red pine may be a long-persisting subclimax. In much of northern New England and eastern Canada, succession may be to spruce-fir and eastern hemlock. In northeastern Minnesota it may be to spruce-fir alone rather than to northern hardwoods (66,76).

Because the crown is not only the source but also the regulating center for all wood growth, silviculturists can manipulate the stand and some features of site to influence both the quantity and quality of wood desired on various parts of the tree bole. They can thin, prune, fertilize, drain excess moisture, and control insects and diseases to this end under specific circumstances (51).

Because of its shade intolerance, red pine grows best in even-aged groups or stands and is well adapted to even-aged management. Depending on conditions and management objectives either the shelterwood system or clearcutting followed by planting or seeding may be used. Natural red pine stands in the Lake States commonly are understocked and produce average yields about one-third those produced by well stocked unmanaged stands. Yet even in these understocked stands yields can be increased by about 50 percent with intensive management. For well stocked stands, yields (including intermediate cuts) can be about doubled if managed wisely (13,14,17,76,101).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Rooting Habit

provided by Silvics of North America
During the first summer, seedlings may develop taproots 15 to 46 cm (6 to 18 in) long. Early rooting depth is fostered by the presence of a water table within 1.2 m (4 ft) of the soil surface and a loose soil. Lateral growth usually outstrips vertical growth after the first year. Most root elongation takes place in the spring and early summer with a second spurt in early fall; prevailing soil moisture and temperature conditions influence the timing and intensity of growth (59,76,90,98).

The usually well-developed root system in old trees tends to be wide spreading and moderately deep. There are numerous stout lateral roots (and often a taproot) with vertical branches (sinkers) descending at acute angles and often some ascending to within 13 mm (0.5 in) of the surface, giving the tree strong support and making it windfirm. The root system is more extensive on loamy sands than on fine sandy loams.

The lateral roots radiate in an irregular oval shape from the tree at irregular intervals, usually remaining within 10 to 46 cm (4 to 18 in) of the surface and sometimes attaining a length greater than tree height in stands up to 9.4 m (31 ft) tall. They may grow as much as 104 to 130 cm (41 to 51 in) in a year, but usually much less. By 45 to 50 years stem height is twice the length of the longest laterals. Fine roots develop along the main laterals. If unhindered by competition of neighboring trees, the longest laterals may extend 12.2 m (40 ft) beyond the crown limits. In stands, however, the lateral roots are forced to share growing space with root systems of a number of other trees. For example, in an Ontario plantation the roots of a red pine 8.2 m (27 ft) tall extended into the growing space of 23 other trees, and its own space was invaded by the roots of 11 trees.

Both central and lateral vertical roots occur, and these commonly penetrate from 1.5 to 4.6 m (5 to 15 ft) and grow slowly after the first 10 years. Generally the taproot and other vertical roots tend to go through rather than around materials that are difficult to penetrate (in contrast to white pine roots that tend to go around such obstacles).

Red pine roots die back in soils seasonally saturated for more than 3 months and their downward growth is restricted if soil drainage is poor. Hardpan, gley near the surface, coarse compacted soils, and those with bulk densities exceeding 1.40 g/cm³ (0.81 oz/in³) stunt root systems (16,27,76, 89,90).

Mycorrhizae formed on the roots of red pine seedlings by Boletinus pictus, Tylopilus felleus, Cenococcum graniforme, Gomphidius superiorensis, G. vinicolor, several species of Suillus and Scleroderma aurantium improve the uptake of soil moisture and mineral nutrients (39,67,68,73).

Natural root grafts, usually 10 to 36 cm (4 to 14 in) below the soil surface, are common in red pines past 15 years old, especially where there is pressure as when two roots grow over or adjacent to a stone. The majority of trees in a stand may be connected directly or in directly with one to six other trees. Grafting is more common among large roots, but occasionally small roots are joined with larger ones. Thinning seems to stimulate an increase in root grafts. Such grafts may transmit diseases (such as Heterobasidion annosum), silvicides, and fertilizers but they also retard insect and disease effects on the stumps of cut trees, sustain weak trees during droughts (by transmitting moisture and nutrients), increase windfirmness, and keep girdled trees alive for several years (32,43,44,76,90,92).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Seed Production and Dissemination

provided by Silvics of North America
Under favorable growing conditions planted red pines have produced staminate (male) flowers at age 9, ovulate (female) flowers at age 5, and viable seed at age 12. Normally, however, seed production begins at about 15 to 25 years in open grown trees and at 50 to 60 years for those in closed stands. Seed production usually is best in trees from 50 to 150 years of age with an average cone production per tree of about 18 liters (0.5 bushel). The final cone yield (number of survivors/number of female flowers initiated) ranges from 0 to 81 percent from year to year and often is only about 20 percent.

Good seed crops are produced at intervals of 3 to 7 years with light crops in most intervening years (about one year in four may have little or no seed production). Bumper cone crops are produced only once every 10 to 12 years (31,56,76,90).

Only about 45 percent of the scales on a typical red pine cone produce viable seed. At the time of pollination a typical red pine cone has from 30 to 110 (average 60 to 90) ovules that are capable of becoming seeds, but only about half of them actually develop. Cones produced in the upper third of the crown produce more good seeds than those at lower levels, and cones borne on main branch terminals produce more than those borne on lateral terminals.

Cone production per tree improves as stand density decreases. The number of cones produced per tree in a mature medium-stocked stand during a good seed year averages 50 for unthrifty trees, 200 for medium trees, 400 for vigorous and partly open grown trees, and 725 for open grown trees. In seed production areas in the northern Lake States-with 200 to 250 trees per hectare (80 to 100/acre), there may be about 87,500 cones per hectare (35,000/acre) in a good crop year and 17,500/ha (7,100/acre) in a low crop year (57,58,76).

In dense stands less than 20 percent of the trees may produce cones, and the seedfall may average less than 10 seeds per tree. Hence, thinning helps increase red pine cone production per tree, and the recommended average spacing between trees for seed production areas is one-half the average height of dominant and codominant trees. Applying fertilizers also may improve cone production on trees 45 years of age or older with well-developed crowns. Some trees are consistently good and others consistently poor cone producers. Up to 751,000 sound seeds per hectare (300,000/acre) have been found in southeastern Manitoba, and 2,767,000/ha (1,120,000/acre) in Minnesota (19,20,23,30,74,76).

Seeds are light. Cleaned seed averages about 115,000/kg (52,000/lb) and ranges from 66,000 to 156,000/kg (30,000 to 71,000/lb).

The cones open best on hot, still autumn days when there is little wind to carry the seeds far. Seeds may be disseminated up to 275 m (900 ft) from the parent tree, but the effective range, as measured by established seedlings, averages about 12 m (40 ft).

Several factors may reduce red pine seed crops: prolonged rainy weather at the time of pollination; fire injury; many species of insects which consume the flowers and seeds or damage the cones; squirrels, mice, and other animals and several songbirds which eat the seeds or damage cone bearing branches; and an unidentified witches' broom (49,76).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Seedling Establishment and Development

provided by Silvics of North America
In nature red pine stands become established following fire, the only natural agent capable of providing most of the conditions required for natural red pine reproduction. Summer surface fires with an energy output rate less than 700 kW/m of front (200 Btu/(s·ft)) can provide a satisfactory seedbed, kill back some competing tree species, reduce brush competition the first few years, reduce cone insect populations, and produce an open overstory canopy. Given such a fire, other conditions such as the following would be required to ensure the establishment of a new red pine stand: a good red pine seed crop, not too thick a layer of ashes, weather conditions favorable for seed germination and seedling establishment, and subsequent freedom from fire for several decades. Based on observations of old growth stands in north-central Minnesota such a combination of conditions in a given locality may occur only about once in 75 to 100 years (21,61, 76,96).

Germination is epigeal (45). Most seedlings emerge when the temperature is from 21° to 30° C (70° to 86° F). In northern Minnesota, seedlings were established only in those years with rainfall more than 100 mm (4 in) for May, June, and July, or a little less if followed by good rainfall the latter part of the growing season. If rainfall is deficient, the seeds can lie over for 1 to 3 years before germinating. Occasionally a few seeds germinate in the fall. Heavy seeds produce heavier seedlings than do lighter seeds, and the heavier seedlings outgrow the lighter seedlings for at least the first 10 years.

Red pine seeds may germinate, but seedlings do not grow beneath dense brush, on heavy litter or sod, or on recent bums with a heavy cover of ashes. Germination is best under conditions that favor high moisture content in the seed, such as a fine sand seedbed, thin moss or litter, a water table within 1.2 m (4 ft) of the soil surface, some shade, abundant precipitation, and light covering of the seed. Germination is satisfactory at a range of soil reactions but is reduced at pH 8.5 or higher. Young seedlings grow best on soil media with good moisture retention, a high cation exchange capacity, and low pH- 5.1 to 5.5. Germination is inhibited by full sunlight for 4 hours or more per day (2,21,29,45,69,70,76).

Approximately 35 percent of full sunlight offers satisfactory conditions for red pine seedlings to become established and they can achieve maximum height growth in as little as 45 percent of full sunlight up to age 5. Establishment is uncertain with light values below 17 percent, although very young seedlings can exist in less than 3 percent light. Because decreasing light levels diminish root weight more than top weight, shade grown seedlings are smaller in all dimensions (stem length and dry weight of stem, foliage, and roots) except needle length than those grown in full sunlight, and the average rate of photosynthesis is higher in shade grown shoots. After they have grown above the sparse ground cover that favored germination and early survival, the number of seedlings per hectare seems to increase with light up to full daylight. The height growth of the red pine seedlings also increases with increasing sunlight up to 63 percent of full daylight, or up to 6 hours of full sunlight, and their dry weight increases up to full light (44,54,76).

The age of the mother tree appears to affect the time of flushing in first-year seedlings; it is earliest in progeny of mother trees 80 to 120 years old, and later in progeny of trees less than 30 years old and trees more than 121 years old (76).

The time that shoot growth begins and ends varies with the season within a locality and with the climatic conditions over the range of red pine. Reserves in old needles contribute up to 80 percent or more to total shoot elongation, and phloem-translocated reserves from main branches, main stem, and roots contribute most of the balance. Terminal shoot growth begins in the spring when the mean weekly air temperature is about 10° C (50° F) and the current soil temperature is from 13.3° C (56° F) at the surface to 5.6° C (42° F) at a depth of 61 cm (24 in); this growth is completed in 43 to 123 days depending upon the locality and season (48,71,76).

The period of cambial growth begins a little later than shoot elongation and is only about two-thirds completed when shoot growth ceases. In seedlings, summer wood formation begins when needle elongation stops. The roots continue to grow after cambial growth stops. After this the needles reach their maximum growth rate, followed by a second high of cambial growth. After nearly all growth is completed and a full complement of needles is functioning, the roots reach a second maximum of elongation. Radial growth seems to be closely related to the precipitation of the current season, especially in the early part of the growing season (25,76).

Red pine seedlings usually grow slowly in the wild, especially if they are shaded. At the end of the first year, wild seedlings often are less than 3 cm (1 in) tall. After 4 or 5 years the growth rate begins to increase, but seedlings usually take 4 to 10 years to reach breast height (1.37 m or 4.5 ft) and overtopped seedlings may take 15 to 16 years. For many years thereafter height growth may average about 0.3 m (I ft) per year in the Lake States and Ontario and 0.5 m (1.5 ft) per year in the Northeast (76,90).

The productivity of the site is reflected by the average annual height growth above breast height or better, above 2.4 m (8 ft), ranging from 25 to 66 cm (10 to 26 in) for poor to good sites (6,13,76,90).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Soils and Topography

provided by Silvics of North America
Natural stands of red pine are confined largely to sandy soils. They are most common on Entisols followed in order by Spodosols, Alfisols, and Inceptisols. Common materials are glaciofluvial and aeolian in origin, and lacustrine deposits and loamy and finer till soils are less frequently occupied. Red pine commonly grows on dry soils low in fertility, but it is also found on a variety of sites including organic debris over rock outcrops and some structured lacustrine red clays, where it may be somewhat stunted, however. Red pine is rarely found in swamps but is common along swamp borders. It does not grow where the surface soil is alkaline, although it grows on dry, acid soils overlying well drained limestones or calcareous soils. Although it can grow well on silt loams, red pine grows only sporadically on heavier soils, probably because of its inability to compete with more aggressive species and because of root injuries known to occur on some such soils. It grows especially well (height growth may be doubled) on naturally sub-irrigated soils with well aerated surface layers and a water table at a depth of 1 to 3 m (4 to 9 ft) in Wisconsin. Best plantation development is made on soils that range from moderately drained to those without substantial moisture stress (8,11,16,24,55, 90,91,95,100).

In typical old growth stands in the Lake States the organic layer (L, F, and H layers) seldom builds up to a depth of more than 5 to 13 cm (2 to 5 in), and its ovendry weight increases with stand density from 12 300 to 84 100 kg/ha (11,000 to 75,000 lb/acre). Beneath is a gray, leached layer of sandy soil 15 to 20 cm (6 to 8 in) thick overlying a brownish layer of sandy soil 1 or more meters (3 or more feet) thick. Sometimes discontinuous bands or lenses of finer textured material are found at depths up to 3 m (9 ft) and their silt-plus-clay content improves the productivity of red pine. In dry summers almost all available moisture may be withdrawn to a depth of 0.6 to 2.1 m (2 to 7 ft) or more.

Red pine grows satisfactorily on soils that, in the upper 25 cm (10 in), have a pH of 4.5 to 6.0, a bulk density of about 1.30 g/cm³ (0.75 oz/in³), a silt-plus-clay content of 10 to 40 percent, available water storage capacity of 6 to 23 percent, a base exchange capacity of 2 to 11 milliequivalents (meq) per 100 g, organic matter content of at least 1.7 percent, total nitrogen content of 1100 to 1700 kg/ha (1,000 to 1,500 lb/acre), available phosphorus of 34 to 146 kg/ha (30 to 130 lb/acre), available potassium of 126 to 157 kg/ha (112 to 140 lb/acre), exchangeable calcium of 0.80 to 2.00 meq per 100 g, and exchangeable magnesium of 0.20 to 0.45 meq per 100 g (3,4,5,12,36, 76,99).

In the Lake States and Ontario, red pine grows most commonly on level or gently rolling sand plains or on low ridges adjacent to lakes and swamps, at elevations from 240 to 430 m (800 to 1,400 ft) above sea level. In the East it is found not only on outwash plains but also on mountain slopes and hilltops. It grows chiefly at elevations between 210 and 400 m (700 to 1,300 ft) above sea level in New England, and up to 820 m (2,700 ft) in the Adirondacks.

The West Virginia outliers are found at an elevation of 945 to 1290 m (3,100 to 4,200 ft) above sea level. In Canada the production of red pine increases from pine ridges to pine plains to pine uplands (44,76,87).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Special Uses

provided by Silvics of North America
Red pine has been grown primarily for the production of wood for lumber, piling, poles, cabin logs, railway ties, posts, mine timbers, box boards, pulpwood, and fuel. It has been one of the most extensively planted species in the northern United States and Canada, not only for wood production but also for dune and sandblow control, snowbreaks, windbreaks, and Christmas trees. Even when wood production is the main goal, red pine forests often are managed throughout their rotation for other uses such as recreation, wildlife habitat, and watersheds.

On sandy farmland in the Lake States, narrow strips (usually 3 to 8 rows) of red pine have been planted at intervals to reduce wind-caused soil erosion in the fields. Similarly, narrow strips have been planted along roads to control snow drifting and to improve scenic aspects. Red pine has been planted to help control sand dunes near Lake Michigan and also to control "sandblows" that develop when cover is removed from light sandy soils. Such stands should be managed to retain long live crowns and to maintain good vigor without losing essential reduction of wind velocities.

Red pine stands are popular places for hiking, camping, and other recreational activities, especially when the trees are large and located near a lake or stream. Red pine forests used for recreation should be managed to maintain a high proportion of large old-growth trees.

Red pine stands produce litter (more than 9000 kg/ha or 8,000 lb/acre at age 15) that helps prevent erosion by absorbing moisture, but they also contribute to moisture depletion in the top 1 m (3.3 ft) of soil. Such stands also increase the snowpack water content and consequently the spring snowmelt runoff over that of unplanted areas or those growing deciduous trees. The water yield of red pine stands in Minnesota was less than for aspen stands and decreased with stand density. Well stocked young red pine stands intercept some precipitation (average throughfall is 87 percent and stem flow 2 percent of precipitation).

The management of red pine stands should be coordinated with that of other types on a watershed so as to deter soil erosion and maintain an even flow of high quality water.

Although red pine stands generally are considered poor habitat for game birds and animals, they provide cover, nesting sites, and some food for many species of birds and animals. For wildlife purposes the stands should be managed in patches so as to provide an array of conditions from small openings to mature groups (13,14,15,18,38,77,78,79,80,97).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Vegetative Reproduction

provided by Silvics of North America
In nature red pine does not reproduce vegetatively. Only with great difficulty can stem cuttings or leaf bundles be rooted artificially regardless of treatment, and no successful propagation of red pine by tissue culture methods has yet been reported.

As many as 84 percent of cuttings, taken during the summer from side branches of 3-year-old red pine seedlings, took root in sand under mist if the stock plants had been fertilized heavily and the cuttings had been treated with indolebutyric acid and water. The rooted cuttings at I year were equal to or better than 2-0 nursery grown seedlings (76).

Dormant red pine scions kept overwinter at -18° C (0° F) can be field grafted successfully onto red pine and Scotch pine (P. sylvestris) stocks in the spring. Successful grafts also have been made on eastern white pine and Mugho pine (P. mugo). Side veneer grafting of dormant scions on potted rootstock forced in the greenhouse in February has been successful in northern Wisconsin. Grafting is rarely successful on jack pine stocks. Semisucculent shoots from 12-year-old red pine trees were successfully cleft grafted on 9-year-old Scotch pine in the field; the shoots were collected and on the same day were grafted on current season's shoots that had just completed height growth. Incompatibility of interspecific grafts, however, appears to be a serious problem (28,47,64,76).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Brief Summary

provided by Silvics of North America
Pinaceae -- Pine family

Paul 0. Rudolf

Red pine (Pinus resinosa), also called Norway pine, is one of the most extensively planted species in the northern United States and Canada. It is a medium-size tree with lightweight, close-grained, pale reddish wood used primarily for timber and pulpwood. Trees 97 cm (38 in) in d.b.h. and 43 m (141 ft) tall in Michigan are among the largest living specimens.

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Distribution

provided by Silvics of North America
Red pine is confined to the Northern Forest region and the southern fringe of the Boreal Forest region. It grows in a narrow zone about 2400 km (1,500 mi) long and 800 km (500 mi) wide around the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River, most of it within or closely adjacent to the area glaciated during the late Pleistocene (76). Its range extends from Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, southern Quebec, and Maine, westward to central Ontario and southeastern Manitoba, southward to southeastern Minnesota and eastward to Wisconsin, Michigan, southern Ontario, northern Pennsylvania, northern New Jersey, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. It also grows locally in northern Illinois, eastern West Virginia, and Newfoundland (53).


- The native range of red pine.

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
USDA, Forest Service
original
visit source
partner site
Silvics of North America

Physical Description

provided by USDA PLANTS text
Tree, Evergreen, Monoecious, Habit erect, Trees without or rarely having knees, Tree with bark rough or scaly, Young shoots 3-dimensional, Buds resinous, Leaves needle-like, Leaves alternate, Needle-like leaf margins finely serrulate (use magnification or slide your finger along the leaf), Leaf apex acute, Leaves < 5 cm long, Leaves < 10 cm long, Leaves yellow-green above, Leaves yellow-green below, Leaves not blue-green, Leaves white-striped, Needle-like leaves triangular, Needle-like leaves somewhat rounded, Needle-like leaves twisted, Needle-like leaves not twisted, Needle-like leaf habit erect, Needle-like leaves per fascicle mostly 2, Needle-like leaf sheath persistent, Twigs glabrous, Twigs viscid, Twigs not viscid, Twigs without peg-like projections or large fascicles after needles fall, Berry-like cones orange, Woody seed cones < 5 cm long, Woody seed cones > 5 cm long, Seed cones bearing a scarlike umbo, Umbo with missing or very weak prickle, Umbo with obvious prickle, Bracts of seed cone included, Seeds brown, Seeds winged, Seeds unequally winged, Seed wings prominent, Seed wings equal to or broader than body.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
compiler
Stephen C. Meyers
compiler
Aaron Liston
compiler
Steffi Ickert-Bond
compiler
Damon Little
original
visit source
partner site
USDA PLANTS text

Pinus resinosa

provided by wikipedia EN

Pinus resinosa, known as red pine[2][3] (also Norway pine in Minnesota),[4] is a pine native to North America.

Description

Red pine is a coniferous evergreen tree characterized by tall, straight growth.[5] It usually ranges from 20–35 metres (66–115 feet) in height and 1 m (3 ft 3 in) in trunk diameter, exceptionally reaching 43.77 m (143+12 ft) tall.[6] The crown is conical, becoming a narrow rounded dome with age. The bark is thick and gray-brown at the base of the tree, but thin, flaky and bright orange-red in the upper crown; the tree's name derives from this distinctive character. Some red color may be seen in the fissures of the bark. The species is self pruning; there tend not to be dead branches on the trees, and older trees may have very long lengths of branchless trunk below the canopy.

The leaves are needle-like, dark yellow-green, in fascicles of two,[5] 12–18 centimetres (4+34–7 inches) long, and brittle. The leaves snap cleanly when bent; this character, stated as diagnostic for red pine in some texts, is however shared by several other pine species. The cones are symmetrical ovoid, 4–6 cm (1+122+14 in) long by 2.5 cm (1 in) broad, and purple before maturity, ripening to nut-blue and opening to 4–5 cm (1+12–2 in) broad, the scales without a prickle and almost stalkless.[2]

Phylogeny

Red pine is notable for its very constant morphology and low genetic variation throughout its range, suggesting it has been through a near extinction in its recent evolutionary history.[7][8] A genetic study of nuclear microsatellite polymorphisms among populations distributed throughout its natural range found that red pine populations from Newfoundland are genetically distinct from most mainland populations, consistent with dispersal from different glacial refugia in this highly self-pollinating species.[9]

Distribution and habitat

It occurs from Newfoundland west to Manitoba, and south to Pennsylvania, with several smaller, disjunct populations occurring in the Appalachian Mountains in Virginia and West Virginia, as well as a few small pockets in extreme northern New Jersey and northern Illinois.[1][10]

It can be found in a variety of habitats.

Ecology

It is intolerant of shade, but does well in windy sites; it grows best in well-drained soil. It is a long-lived tree, reaching a maximum age of about 500 years.[11]

Uses

The wood is commercially valuable in forestry for timber and paper pulp, and the tree is also used for landscaping.

In culture

The red pine is Minnesota's state tree.[12] In Minnesota the use of the name "Norway"[4] may stem from early Scandinavian immigrants who likened the American red pines to the Scots pines back home.[13]

References

  1. ^ a b Farjon, A. (2013). "Pinus resinosa". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2013: e.T42410A2978087. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T42410A2978087.en. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  2. ^ a b Moore, Gerry; Kershner, Bruce; Tufts, Craig; et al. (May 9, 2008). National Wildlife Federation Field Guide to Trees of North America. New York: Sterling Publishing. p. 66. ISBN 978-1-4027-3875-3.
  3. ^ "Red Pine". dnr.state.mn.us. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
  4. ^ a b Hoyt, Richard (21 September 2017). "Red Pine Tree Facts". gardenguides.com. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  5. ^ a b Kral, Robert (1993). "Pinus resinosa". In Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.). Flora of North America North of Mexico (FNA). Vol. 2. New York and Oxford – via eFloras.org, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA.
  6. ^ Earle, Christopher J., ed. (2018). "Pinus resinosa". The Gymnosperm Database. Retrieved 5 February 2012.
  7. ^ Fowler, D. P.; Morris, R. W. (1977). "Genetic diversity in Red Pine: evidence for low genic heterozygosity". Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 7 (2): 343–347. doi:10.1139/x77-043.
  8. ^ Simon, Jean-Pierre; Bergeron, Yves; Gagnon, Daniel (1986). "Isozyme uniformity in populations of Red Pine (Pinus resinosa) in the Abitibi Region, Quebec". Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 16 (5): 1133–1135. doi:10.1139/x86-198.
  9. ^ Jacquelyn Boys, Marilyn Cherry, Selvadurai Dayanandan (2005). "Microsatellite Analysis Reveals Genetically Distinct Populations of Red Pine". American Journal of Botany. 92 (5): 833–841. doi:10.3732/ajb.92.5.833. PMID 21652464. Retrieved May 1, 2017.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  10. ^ Hilty, John (2020). "Pinus resinosa". Illinois Wildflowers. Retrieved May 1, 2017.
  11. ^ "Eastern OLDLIST: A database of maximum tree ages for Eastern North America". Columbia Climate School, Columbia University. Retrieved February 24, 2022 – via ldeo.columbia.edu.
  12. ^ "State Tree- Norway Pine". sos.state.mn.us. Minnesota Secretary of State.
  13. ^ Wright, Jacob J. (September 21, 2017). "What is a Norway Pine Tree?". gardenguides.com. Archived from the original on June 27, 2019. Retrieved February 24, 2022.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Pinus resinosa: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

Pinus resinosa, known as red pine (also Norway pine in Minnesota), is a pine native to North America.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN