dcsimg

Description

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
This frog is a member of the mountain yellow-legged frog complex which is comprised of two species: Rana muscosa and Rana sierrae. Both species are highly aquatic and are always found within a meter or two from the edge of water. Rana sierrae is yellowish or reddish brown from above, with black or brown spots or lichen-like markings. Toe tips are usually dusky. Underside of hind legs and sometimes entire belly is yellow or slightly orange, usually more opaque than in foothill yellow-legged frog, Rana boylii. Yellow often extends forward to level of forelimbs. Dorsolateral folds present but frequently indistinct. The tadpoles are black or dark brown and are large (total length often exceeds 10 cm) and metamorphose in 1-4 years depending on the elevation. Rana sierrae differs from Rana muscosa in having relatively shorter legs. When a leg is folded against the body the tibio-tarsal joint typically falls short of the external nares. The mating call of R. sierrae is significantly different from that of R. muscosa in having transitions between pulsed and noted sounds. Both species call underwater. Males can be heard above water but only from a short distance away (7,000 frog surveys over a 20-year period and showed recovery despite ongoing stressors such as disease and introduced predatory fish. Results from a laboratory experiment indicate that these increases may be in part because of reduced frog susceptibility to chytridiomycosis, but the cessation of fish stocking also contributed to the recovery. Continuing studies will determine if local extinction sites become repopulated (Written by Vance Vredenburg).This species was featured as News of the Week on 24 October 2016:Major habitat restoration moves ahead for two endangered montane frogs in California. After years of review and planning, the National Park Service (USA) is officially moving forward with major plans to restore high elevation aquatic ecosystems in the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks in the Sierra Nevada of California. These actions will help recover two endangered montane frogs, the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae) and the Sierra Madre or Southern Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa). These significant conservation actions, based in part on results from a 2004 field experiment (Vredenburg 2004) showing rapid recovery of endangered frogs after removal of introduced non-native fish (trout) from habitats, will help the frogs as they face new threats such as disease, drought and climate change (Written by Vance Vredenburg).This species was featured as News of the Week on 11 February 2019:A study by Ellison et al. (2019) investigates the interaction between Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), the pathogen that causes the disease chytridiomycosis, and the bacterial skin microbiome of the endangered Sierra Nevada Yellow‐legged frog, Rana sierrae, using both culture‐dependent and culture‐independent methods. The study found that the skin microbiome of highly infected juvenile frogs is characterized by significantly reduced species richness and evenness, and by strikingly lower variation between individuals, compared to juveniles and adults with lower infection levels. In a culture‐dependent Bd inhibition assay, the bacterial metabolites we evaluated all inhibited the growth of Bd. Together, these results illustrate the disruptive effects of Bd infection on host skin microbial community structure and dynamics, and suggest possible avenues for the development of anti‐Bd probiotic treatments (Written by Vance Vredenburg).This species was featured as News of the Week on 5 October 2020:The endangered Sierra Nevada Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana sierrae) has generally been viewed as a lake species, but it also occurs in streams, yet in those habitats, there is little knowledge of its basic ecological requirements. Brown et al (2020) investigated the demography, habitat use, and movements of 12 stream populations of these frogs using multiple techniques (e.g., capture–mark–recapture and radio-tracking of adults, quantitative description of stream channel and riparian vegetation, frog habitat use, and egg masses counts). Stream populations varied in size (< 15 - 547 adults), and were found in diverse headwater streams. Frogs moved little over four-day survey periods, but were capable of moving longer distances of up to 1.2 km over the summer. This study provides important basic ecological requirements from overlooked populations of a species and reminds us that understanding a species complete natural history is critical to conservation and management efforts (Written by Vance Verdenburg).
license
cc-by-3.0
author
Vance Vredenburg
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Distribution and Habitat

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
This montane species once occurred in California and Nevada, USA but is now extinct in the state of Nevada. Rana sierrae ranges from the Diamond Mountains northeast of the Sierra Nevada in Plumas County, California, south through the Sierra Nevada to the type locality, the southern-most locality at Matlock Lake just east of Kearsarge Pass (Inyo County, California). In the extreme northwest region of the Sierra Nevada, several populations occur just north of the Feather River, and to the east, there was a population on Mt. Rose, northeast of Lake Tahoe in Washoe County, Nevada, but, as mentioned above, it is now extinct. West of the Sierra Nevada crest, the southern part of the R. sierrae range is bordered by ridges that divide the Middle and South Fork of the Kings River, ranging from Mather Pass on the John Muir Trail east to the Monarch Divide. East of the Sierra Nevada crest, R. sierrae occurs in the Glass Mountains just south of Mono Lake (Mono County, CA) and along the east slope of the Sierra Nevada south to the type locality at Matlock Lake (Inyo County, CA).
license
cc-by-3.0
author
Vance Vredenburg
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
Similar to R. muscosa, breeding begins soon after ice-melt or early in spring and can range from April at lower elevations to June and July in higher elevations (Wright and Wright 1949; Stebbins 1951; Zweifel 1955). Eggs are deposited underwater in clusters attached to rocks, gravel, and under banks, or to vegetation in streams or lakes (Wright and Wright 1949; Stebbins 1951; Zweifel 1955). Livezey and Wright (1945) report an average of 233 eggs per mass(n=6, range 100-350). Eggs contain a vitelline capsule, and three gelatinous envelopes, all clear and transparent (see illustrations in: Stebbins 2003). In laboratory breeding experiments egg hatching times ranged from 18-21+ days at temperatures ranging from 5-13.5 °C (Zweifel 1955). The length of the larval stage depends upon the elevation. At lower elevations where the summers are longer, tadpoles are able to grow to metamorphosis in a single season (Storer 1925). At higher elevations where the growing season can be as short as three months, tadpoles must overwinter at least once and may take 2 or 4 years of growth before they are large enough to transform (Wright and Wright 1949; Zweifel 1955).
license
cc-by-3.0
author
Vance Vredenburg
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
Rana sierrae is critically endangered, along with its sister species Rana muscosa. These frogs have declined dramatically despite the fact that most of the habitat is protected in National Parks and National Forest lands. A study that compares recent surveys (1995-2005) to historical localities (1899-1994; specimens from the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and the California Academy of Sciences) found that 92.5% of populations have gone extinct (11 remaining out of 146 sites; Vredenburg et al. 2007). The two most important factors leading to declines in R. sierrae and R. muscosa are disease and introduced predators. Introduced trout prey on R. sierrae (Needham and Vestal 1938; Mullally and Cunningham 1956)and have been implicated in a number of studies as one of the sources of decline (Bradford 1989; Bradford et al. 1993; Jennings 1994; Knapp 1996; Drost and Fellers 1996; Knapp and Matthews 2000). In fact, as early as 1915 Joseph Grinnell and his field crews (Grinnell and Storer 1924) noticed that Rana sierrae rarely survived in lakes where trout were planted. Whole lake field experiments have shown that when non-native trout are removed, both Rana sierrae and Rana muscosa populations rebound (Vredenburg, 2004; Knapp et al. 2007). While it is clear that introduced trout negatively affect R. sierrae and R. muscosa mainly through predation on tadpoles, trout also compete for resources with adult frogs. A food web study that used stable isotopes to trace energy through the Sierran lake food webs concluded that introduced trout are superior competitors and suppress the availability of large aquatic insects that make up a major portion of the diets of adult frogs (Finlay and Vredenburg 2007). A lethal disease, chytridiomycosis (http://www.amphibiaweb.org/chytrid/chytridiomycosis.html), caused by an aquatic fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, or Bd (Berger et al. 1998) has caused population extinctions in R. muscosa and R. sierrae in the Sierra Nevada (Rachowicz et al. 2006). Long-term studies reveal that infection intensity is key; once a critical threshold of Bd fungal infection is reached, death ensues (Vredenburg et al. 2010). Population extirpation is the most common outcome, but a few mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae and Rana muscosa) populations have survived in low numbers. Modeling shows that chytriodiomycosis outcome at the population level (extirpation vs. persistence) can result solely from density-dependent host-pathogen dynamics, which may hold for other wildlife diseases as well (Briggs et al. 2010). In an effort to rescue the last surviving frogs, the Vredenburg lab is treating adult Rana sierrae in the field with anti-fungal medication; frogs are bathed for five minutes daily over the course of a week (Lubick 2010). Other possible causes for decline in R. sierrae include air pollution (pesticide drift; Davidson et al. 2002; Davidson 2004), UV-B radiation, and long term changes in weather patterns, especially concerning the severity and duration of droughts. Acidification from atmospheric deposition has been suggested as another cause, but Bradford et al. (1994) found no evidence to support this hypothesis. For more information on active research on this species please see: Vance Vredenburg (http://web.me.com/vancevredenburg/Vances_site/Home.html) Cherie Briggs (http://www.lifesci.ucsb.edu/eemb/labs/briggs/) Roland Knapp (http://www.mylfrog.info/)
license
cc-by-3.0
author
Vance Vredenburg
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Relation to Humans

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
Mountain yellow-legged frogs (the amphibian species complex including both Rana muscosa and Rana sierrae) were once the most common vertebrates in the high elevation Sierra Nevada. Documented historical accounts go back to the turn of the last century (1915) from surveys conducted by Joseph Grinnell and Tracy Storer (published in 1924) from the University of California's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Joseph Grinnell was instrumental in the foundation of Yosemite National Park, one of the jewels of the American National Park Service.
license
cc-by-3.0
author
Vance Vredenburg
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog

provided by wikipedia EN

The Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog or Sierra Nevada Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae) is a true frog endemic to the Sierra Nevada of California and Nevada in the United States. It was formerly considered Rana muscosa until a 2007 study elevated the more central and northern populations to full species status, restricting R. muscosa to the southern Sierra Nevada and southern California.

Once abundant in the Sierra Nevadas, the ecological effects of their loss have been significant as they were a keystone species and important for nutrient and energy cycling in the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.[4]

Description

Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae)

The Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog is one of the two mountain yellow-legged frog species which include Rana sierrae and Rana muscosa. The Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae) is very similar in appearance to the southern mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa), with which it was formerly identified. The two were separated into different species after there were observed differences in mitochondrial DNA. This species of frog is considered to be aquatic and is found within close proximity to water usually within a few meters. The frogs appear either yellow or brown and have both brown and black spots. These spots can also become grey, red, or green through cryptic coloration.[5] The belly of the frogs is more noticeably yellow and can also appear orange. Tadpoles of this species appear black or brown and take between one and four years to fully develop. On average, they grow up to 1.5 to 3.5 inches (3.8 to 8.9 cm) long and females tend to be larger than males.[4][6] The frogs lack vocal sacs, however, they can still vocalize by making a clicking sound both in and out of the water.[5] These frogs hibernate during the winter staying at the bottom of frozen lakes. These frogs may only be active for around three months per year depending on the weather.[5]

Sierra Nevada yellow legged frogs can also be grey, red, or greenish-brown with dark splotches. These splotches look like lichen or moss, making the frogs camouflaged; this type of coloration is cryptic coloration.[6] The belly and the underside of the back legs are yellow, giving rise to the name.[6]

If disturbed, these frogs can produce a garlic-like odor to ward off threats like predators.[6]

Life cycle

Rana sierrae tadpole

Breeding for this species starts in spring which varies on the elevation of the area between April and July. Eggs are left in groups underwater with an average size of 233 eggs and are attached to something in the water. The eggs will then hatch between 18 and 21 days. The tadpoles which hatch from the eggs will then develop into adult frogs over a period ranging from 1 to 4 years. The frogs will then reproduce, therefore, repeating the cycle.

Oviposition occurs is shallow waters of ponds. Egg masses can be attached to ricks, gravel, vegetation, or under banks.[7]

Habitat and range

These frogs inhabit mountain bodies of water such as streams, lakes, wetlands, and flooded meadows from 4,500 feet to 12,000 feet elevation.[6] They spend most of their lives in or around these water sources as they provide essential food sources and raising ground for tadpoles. The frogs inhabit both the East and Western Sierras down to areas North of Lake Tahoe. Although their range has not changed, the population density of the species has declined over the years due to their endangered status as well as other threats to their habitat.

Adults can be found sitting on large rocks of the shoreline. Where there is little vegetation, larvae are distributed in warm shallow areas of water during daytime.[7]

Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog range

Breeding sites include ponds, lakes, and streams that do not dry out, are deep enough to prevent freezing, and are without fish.[7]

Reproduction

Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frogs reproduce in the water. Once adults are matured, male frogs will call for a mate and upon the arrival of a female the male will grasp their back and release sperm as the female releases eggs. Fertilization occurs outside the body and 100-350 eggs can be laid at one time. Eggs are laid in shallow water and are not attached to anything but can become attached to vegetation or rocks in moving water. Eggs must be laid in areas where the water does not freeze over winter in order for the tadpoles to survive. If the water was to freeze in a breeding zone it could lead to the deaths of three to four generations of tadpoles.[5]

Conservation status

The Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog has been declared vulnerable by the IUCN. Studies showed that 92.5% of the species populations have gone extinct. These declines have been caused in most part by disease and invasive predators. Shallow lakes that dry in summer endanger this high-elevation frog. Predation by non-native trout also plays a large role in limiting breeding and tadpole development. The trout eat many of the tadpoles that are produced while also competing against adult frogs for resources. Areas containing trout have seen major declines in the frog population and experiments have shown that the removal of the trout leads to a rise in the frog population. Many factors endangering the southern mountain yellow-legged frog also affect this species. A disease called chytridiomycosis has led to the extinction of entire populations of the species. This disease is caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis or bd. Populations that have been infected by the disease have either been eradicated or reduced to a few individuals. This species also suffers from habitat fragmentation since populations of the frogs have become separated from one another.

Studies show that a recently discovered amphibian chytrid fungus is contributing to the decline of the Sierra yellow-legged frog. Chytrid fungus leads to Chytridiomycosis, a disease than can be fatal. Chytrid fungus lives on keratin which is found on the external mouthparts of tad poles and the outer skin layer of adults. The growth of this fungus on adults disrupts the species ability to breathe through its skin and osmoregulate. More research on the origins and spread of chytrid fungus is still needed.[4]

Conservation strategies

Yosemite

In 2006, Yosemite National Park began a Yosemite Conservancy–supported project to introduce frogs into lakes without fish. In 2007, a project was started to restore frog habitat by removing non-native fish from remote sites. Once the site is fishless, lakes are inhabited by native species, including the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog.

References

  1. ^ IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group (2022). "Rana sierrae". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2022: e.T136114A119000359. Retrieved 26 December 2022.
  2. ^ "Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frog (Rana sierrae)". Environmental Conservation Online System. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
  3. ^ 79 FR 24256
  4. ^ a b c Alpha, Tau Rho (1991). Oblique map of Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, central Sierra Nevada, California (Report). Miscellaneous Investigations Series. U.S. Geological Survey. doi:10.3133/i2149.
  5. ^ a b c d "Sierra Nevada Yellow-Legged Frog - Amphibians and Reptiles, Endangered Species Accounts | Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office". Sacramento Fish and Wildlife. 30 July 2020. Archived from the original on 7 November 2021.
  6. ^ a b c d e ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT SACRAMENTO CA (2001-12-01). "Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration, Fresno, California. Appendix C. Basis of Design and Cost Estimate Office Report" (PDF). Fort Belvoir, VA. Retrieved 28 April 2023. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ^ a b c Lewis, Todd R (2021-11-07). "New population of mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) discovered". dx.doi.org. doi:10.31219/osf.io/e3rvw. S2CID 243856057. Retrieved 2021-11-13.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog or Sierra Nevada Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae) is a true frog endemic to the Sierra Nevada of California and Nevada in the United States. It was formerly considered Rana muscosa until a 2007 study elevated the more central and northern populations to full species status, restricting R. muscosa to the southern Sierra Nevada and southern California.

Once abundant in the Sierra Nevadas, the ecological effects of their loss have been significant as they were a keystone species and important for nutrient and energy cycling in the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN