Comprehensive Description
provided by Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology
Scarus sordidus Forskal
Scarus sordidus Forskål, 1775, pp. x, 80 [neotype: USNM 202297; Red Sea].—Schultz, 1958, p. 68, fig. 11, pl. 12A, B; 1960, p. 246.—Gosline and Brock, 1960, p. 238 [Hawaiian Islands].—Kamohara, 1963, p. 60, pl. 3: fig. 1 [Japan].—Woodland and Slack-Smith, 1963, p. 46 [Heron Island].
Callyodon sordidus.—Fourmanoir, 1957, p. 187 [Nossi-Bè].
Xanothon sordidus.—Munro, 1967, p. 437, fig. 827 [New Guinea].
Scarus purpureus Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1839, p. 277.
Callyodon purpureus.—Jordan and Seale, 1906, p. 316, fig. 57.
Callyodon bipallidus Smith, 1955, p. 936.
Xanothon bipallidus.—Smith, 1956, p. 5, pl. 41D; 1959, pp. 266, 268, 278, pl. 41D.
Xanothon margaritus Smith, 1956, p. 7, pl. 45G; 1959, pp. 269, 278.
Xanothon erythrodon Smith, 1956, p. 7, pl. 45F; 1959, pp. 269, 278.—Munro, 1967, p. 436, fig. 826 [New Guinea].
See Schultz (1958, pp. 68–69) for other synonyms.
Characterized by having 4 median predorsal scales, 2 rows of scales on cheek, pectoral rays ii,13, occasionally ii,12; lips not covering white teeth, which become greenish in adult males. Juveniles brown to reddish brown with a pale (pink) caudal area that has a round, dark blotch at base of caudal fin. See Schultz (1958, pp. 69–71)for color description of adults.
In 1956 J. L. B. Smith established the new species Xanothon bipallidus with this comment: “Recorded by many workers as sordidus Forskål, 1775, but it is not possible to be certain of Forskål’s species. This name is assigned until it can be settled which has valid priority.” Schultz (1958, p. 131) accepted Scarus bipallidus (Smith) as distinct from the species that he recognized as Scarus sordidus from the western tropical Pacific Ocean. Because Schultz did not have enough adult specimens of the Red Sea sordidus nor the Indian Ocean bipallidus, he was unable to evaluate the sordidus complex. Since then the International Indian Ocean Expeditions collected excellent series of specimens of sordidus from the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean.
Fortunately, this excellent series of specimens, along with additional material from the western Pacific listed by Schultz (1958, pp. 71–72) has made it possible to compare the populations of the S. sordidus complex in the Red Sea and in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Scarus sordidus is one of the most abundant parrotfishes in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It occurs more often and in greater numbers in the collections I have studied than any other species.
I counted the number of fin rays and scales (Table 9) and observed that no significant differences occur in counts among the three localities.
I compared the color patterns of juveniles, females, and of adults in the green color phase from the Red
Sea, Indian Ocean, and Pacific Ocean directly by use of preserved specimens, color slides, color drawings, and color illustrations in the literature from all three areas.
The most characteristic color pattern for juveniles (preserved in alcohol) between 12 and 60 mm is the striped color phase described by Schultz (1958, p. 70). The description needs no changes because of the additional specimens examined from the Red Sea, Indian, and Pacific Oceans.
The reddish-brown color phase is found on specimens from 50 to 200 mm and my description (Schultz 1958, p. 70) needs little change. It applies to specimens from all three areas except that I have not found juveniles or immature specimens with a few silvery scales as occasionally has occurred in the large series examined from the Marshall Islands and Philippine Islands and illustrated by Schultz (1958, pl. 12A). The dark caudal spot in the center of the light caudal area may disappear as this color phase passes into the adult green color phase (probably males).
The pale caudal peduncle begins at a line connecting the rear basal edges of the dorsal and anal fins and appears to be of similar extent in specimens from the Red Sea, the Indian Ocean, and the Pacific Ocean (Table 10).
I compared the color markings of the head and find considerable variability around a basic pattern (Plate 4C). I did not observe any consistent differences in color patterns for the populations of S. sordidus in the three seas.
The width of the two color bands of the anal fin were measured at the midlength of the base of the anal fin, and the width of the distal band was calculated as a percentage of the length of the middle anal ray. These data, recorded in Table 11, show a possibility of
being wider in the western Pacific than in the Indian Ocean and Red Sea. The variability, however, is so great that I conclude a subspecies should not be recognized until a larger series of adult specimens are studied to determine if a significant difference exists. The only other character that might indicate a population difference is the occasional occurrence of light scales (Schultz 1958, pl. 12A) on the immature stage. This, too, needs further study before a population is recognized subspecifically.
I have shown in this study that the Red Sea and Indian Ocean populations of S. sordidus are identical. It must be concluded, therefore, that X. bipallidus Smith is a junior synonym of Scarus sordidus Forskål.
NEOTYPE.—The identity of Scarus sordidus Forskål has not been universally accepted. In order to bring greater nomenclatural stability to the Scaridae since the type material of S. sordidus Forskål no longer exists (Klausewitz and Nielson, 1965, p. 12), I herewith select a neotype for Scarus sordidus Forskål: USNM 202297, adult male, 210 mm standard length, collected by IIOE, Red Sea off Hurghada, Egypt, Sta. HA–36.
The following collections from the Red Sea were loaned for study by Dr. H. Steinitz E62–3676–C–1, 6 April 1962, Um Aabak, 1 spec, 49 mm; E–62–3676–C, 18 March 1962, Nacra, 2 spec, 46–90 mm; E62–3342, 4 April 1962, Entedebir, 1 spec, 138 mm; E62–518, 23 March 1962, Um Aabak, 1 spec, 47 mm.
The following specimens were collected by the IIOE in the Red Sea: USNM 202388, Sta. HA–26, 30 December 1964, Strait of Jubal, 4 spec, 44–105 mm; USNM 202382, Sta. HA–29, 1 January 1965, 12 spec, 38 to 69 mm; USNM 202393, Sta. HA–30, 2 January 1965, 1 spec, 48 mm; USNM 202397, Sta. HA–31, 3 January 1965, 5 spec. 32 to 57 mm; USNM 202481, Sta. HA–32, 4 January 1965, 1 spec; USNM 202405, Sta. HA–34, 5 January 1965, 3 spec, 36 to 57 mm; uncataloged, Sta. HA–35, 6 January 1965, 4 spec, 33–59 mm; USNM 202297, and 202391, Sta. HA–36, 7 January 1965, 19 spec. 37 to 210 mm (photo of 210-mm specimen neg. no. 283); USNM 202402, Sta. HA–38, 10 January 1965, 1 spec, 57 mm.
The following specimens were collected by the IIOE in the Indian Ocean: From Nossi-Bè, Madagascar: USNM 202410, Sta. JR–72, 14 February 1964, 1 spec, 150 mm; USNM 202404, Sta. JR–76, 18 February 1964, 1 spec, 69 mm; USNM 202411, Cruise 6, 12 June 1964, reef off Port Louis Harbor, 1 spec, 115 mm. From the Comoro Islands: USNM 202395, Sta. HA–9, 24 November 1964, 2 spec, 37–38 mm; USNM 202412, Sta. HA–12, 26 November 1964, 2 spec, 164180 mm; USNM 202359, FT–12, 26 November 1964, 1 spec, 225 mm. From Aldabra Island: USNM 202392, Sta. HA–16, 3 December 1964, 11 spec, 23 to 57 mm; USNM 202361, Sta. HA–17, 4 December 1964, 6 spec, 22–210 mm; USNM 202360, Sta. RS–37, 6 December 1964, Farquhar Islands, 10°07′S, 51°10′E, 35 spec. 61–190 mm. From Amirantes Islands: USNM 202408, Sta. HA–19, 8 December 1964, 27 spec, 28 to 82 mm; USNM 202362, Sta. RS–41 KA–39, 8 December 1964, 23 spec, 65–180 mm; USNM 202358, FT–26, 21 December 1964, Gold Mohur Bay, Aden, 1 spec, 225 mm.
The following specimens were collected by the Te Vega Expeditions in the western Pacific Ocean: From off Thailand, uncataloged, Sta. 56, 3 November 1963, 1 spec, 79 mm, and USNM 202406, Sta. 78, 3 November 1963, 5 spec; USNM 202407, Sta. 104, 30 November 1963, off Pulo Siburu, Mentawei Islands, Indonesia 4 spec, 33–109 mm; USNM 202396, Sta. 112, 6 December 1963, Pulo Stupai, Sanding Island, Mentawei Islands, 2 spec, 63–68 mm; USNM 202400, Sta. 213, 1 February 1965, Pulau Gaya, Darvel Bay, Borneo; USNM 202409 and 202625, Sta. 216, 2 February 1965, Pulav Bohidulong east end Borneo, 6 spec, 22–122 mm; USNM 202399, Sta. 234, 25 February 1965, Keraward Island, St. George’s Channel, 3 spec, 13–6 mm; USNM 202363, Sta. 247, 11 March 1965, Solomon Islands, Tautsina Island, Bougainville, 7 spec, 36 to 185 mm; USNM 202413 and 202482, Sta. 259, 16 April 1965, Vanikoro Island, Peu Bay, 4 spec, 40–120 mm; USNM 202394, Sta. 278, 8 May 1965, Great Astrolabe Reef, north of Vuro Island, 7 spec, 35–85 mm; USNM 202398, Sta. 295, 26 May 1965, Wailangilala Island, Fiji, 1 spec, 55 mm. Uncataloged: From Tutuila Island: Sta. 21, 19 August 1963, 8 spec, 29–73 mm; Sta. 35, 3 September 1963, 1 spec, 23 mm.
The following specimens were collected by Dr. John Randall: USNM 202401, Maiai Island, Takahau Atoll, Tuomotu Islands, 14 April 1957, 1 spec, 23 mm; USNM 202364, Takahau Atoll, Matite Island, 15 April 1957, 39 spec, 23–195 mm; USNM 202366, Papeete, Tahiti, Market, 18–21 April 1957, 205–230 mm.
Dr. V. G. Springer collected 8 lots, totaling 27 specimens, 28–200 mm, at One Tree Island off Queensland during November and December 1966.
The IIOE collected the following specimens during 1967 from the Chagas Archipelogo, Diego Garcia Atoll: Sta. HA3, 12 June, 4 spec, 48–187 mm; Sta. HA7, 15 June, 14 spec, 59–147 mm; Sta. HA8, 16 June, 2 spec, 49–66 mm; Sta. HA11, 18 June, 1 spec, 72 mm; Sta. HA14, 21 June, 2 spec, 109–124 mm; Sta. HA16, 22 June, 4 spec, 69–178 mm; Sta. HA36, 7 July, 11 spec, 55–97 mm; Sta. HA38, 9 July, 7 spec, 117–175 mm; Sta. HA45, 16 July, 1 spec. 210 mm; Sta. HA49, 12 spec, 25–52 mm.
RANGE.—Hawaiian Islands, central and western Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean, and Red Sea.
- bibliographic citation
- Schultz, Leonard P. 1969. "The taxonomic status of the controversial genera and species of parrotfishes with a descriptive list (family Scardiae)." Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 1-49. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.17