More info for the terms:
basal area,
competition,
cover,
grassland,
litterThe role of lesser spikemoss in mixed prairie is not well understood,
although its influence on other vegetation and the habitat has been
thought to be slight because its requirements for water and nutrients
are low [
9,
10,
60]. During light showers, its dense mats and extensive,
shallow roots may intercept and soak up all the available water [
55,
57].
During high intensity storms, the mats of lesser spikemoss act to
increase infiltration and decrease runoff and surface erosion [
57]. Its
shallow root system also limits spikemoss growth to periods of the year
when moisture is available at shallow depths [
59].
Grazing effects: The effect of grazing on lesser spikemoss seems to be
confounded by drought. In Canadian and Montana mixed prairie, lesser
spikemoss is able to increase during periods of drought [
10,
18,
58].
Also, lesser spikemoss increases when protected from grazing and
decreases with grazing due to trampling of grazing animals [
10]. Lesser
spikemoss is relatively weakly rooted and easily damaged by trampling
[
37]. Decreases in response to grazing may also be explained by the
exposure and drying of the surface soil when cover is removed by grazing
[
18]. In the short-grass prairie of southeastern Alberta and
southwestern Saskatchewan, grasses can easily establish in areas with
high cover of lesser spikemoss during years with above normal
precipitation, but they are rarely able to establish during dry years
[
7].
A 4-year Montana study done during a period of normal rainfall compared
ungrazed mixed prairie with mixed prairie moderately grazed by sheep.
Cover of lesser spikemoss decreased from 21 to 17.6 percent on the
ungrazed site but it decreased from 15.1 to 7.1 percent on the grazed
area [
58]. The strong decrease on grazed prairie was attributed to
trampling, competition, and manure [
57].
A 7-year study of three levels of grazing intensity on the short-grass
prairie in southeastern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan was done
during dry and drought years [
9]. Lesser spikemoss increased under all
levels of grazing, with the greatest increase in the most lightly grazed
area. On ungrazed land lesser spikemoss increased in basal area from 11
percent to 16 percent. Results of a second 10-year study showed the
basal area of lesser spikemoss increased by 37 percent on ungrazed and 27
percent on grazed land, while grass cover generally decreased. Looking
at total vegetation cover the authors concluded that "climate rather
than moderate grazing use was the principal factor affecting plant
cover" between 1928 and 1939. During a third 5-year study, lesser
spikemoss increased more under a medium level of grazing than under
severe grazing intensity [
9]. Lesser spikemoss increases more under
rotational grazing than under continuous grazing [
9,
65].
A 3-year North Dakota mixed prairie study compared exclosures
established 38 to 41 years previously with cattle-grazed range. Lesser
spikemoss cover did not vary significantly despite major differences in
species composition of grasses and silver sagebrush (Artemisia cana)
[
5,
6]. Site differences were more important than grazing pressure [
6].
Ross and Hunter [
50] list spikemoss as increasing under grazing pressure
in Montana. However, lesser spikemoss increases very slowly when taller,
competing vegetation is partly or wholly removed [
52].
Treatment with fertilizer: The primary effect of manure or fertilizer
applications is to increase the competitiveness of taller grasses, thus
decreasing lesser spikemoss [
18]. However, in the northern plains
response depends upon precipitation [
54]. There is no evidence that
nitrogen application alone kills lesser spikemoss [
52]. When fertilizers
containing nitrogen and phosphorus were added to grassland plots in each
of 2 successive years, the cover of live lesser spikemoss decreased
significantly. It was not determined whether this was due to the
nutrients themselves or because of increased competition from other
vegetation [
57]. Manuring alone increased all plant cover the first
season of a Montana study, but lesser spikemoss was subordinated to the
more vigorous native grasses and decreased the second season [
18].
After more than 30 years with normal weather, lesser spikemoss was still
reduced in plots treated by annual applications of manure for 1 to 11
years [
19]. Mulching, with or without added fertilizer, can nearly
eliminate lesser spikemoss [
66].
Mechanical treatment: Mechanical treatments reduced lesser spikemoss
cover between 25 and 70 percent in northern Montana mixed prairie [
52].
The effects of various combinations of manure treatment, disking, and
harrowing over a 10-year period along with seeding of crested wheatgrass
(Agropyron cristatum) and yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis)
have been studied [
18,
19]. Most treatments resulted in long-term
decreases in lesser spikemoss, and combination treatments seemed most
successful. When the treated area was resurveyed over 30 years later,
lesser spikemoss cover was still so decreased that researchers concluded
that lesser spikemoss does not easily reestablish on northern mixed
prairie following mechanical treatment [
19]. Lesser spikemoss cover and
the cover of either other vegetation or litter were significantly and
negatively correlated [
19].
Chemical control: The most effective chemicals for control of lesser
spikemoss while increasing the yield of desirable grasses are AMS
(ammate) and atrazine [
59]. Spring treatment is most effective.
Monuron, paraquat, and bromacil control lesser spikemoss but also reduce
the yield of or kill other vegetation [
59]. Further range tests
indicate that ammate, atrazine, and monuron are the best treatments.
Their effectiveness is increased with the use of a surfactant
[
52].