dcsimg
Image of Hula Painted Frog
Creatures » » Animal » » Vertebrates » » Amphibians » Frogs And Toads » Midwife Toads »

Hula Painted Frog

Latonia nigriventer (Mendelssohn & Steinitz 1943)

Description

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
A large-sized, robust frog, Latonia nigriventer has a snout-vent length range in females of 69.0 – 128.4 mm and in males of 66.6 – 121.4 mm (Perl et al. 2017). The head is flattened and the width is equal to the length. The snout projects beyond the mouth. There is no canthus rostralis present. The square-shaped nostrils are closer to the snout than the eyes. The internarial distance is smaller than the distance between the eye and the nostril. The interorbital distance is about the same size as the width of the eyelid. The diameter of the eye is larger than the distance between the eye and the tympanum (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). The iris is heart-shaped (Perl et al. 2017). The tympanum is indistinct and shorter in height than in width. There are two glandular ridges that extend from the posterior side of the eye. The first passes over the tympanum and ends at the insertion of the forearm. The second extends backwards and diffuses at the shoulder girdle into several glandular elevations on the dorsum (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). There is a distinct dermal fold that transverse the neck. The forearms are strong (Perl et al. 2017). The fingers do not have webbing and the tips vary in appearance from round to pointed. The relative finger lengths are 3 > 2 > 4 > 1. There are three palmar tubercles, with the inner tubercle being about twice as large as the smallest palmar tubercle (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). The hindlimbs are relatively short (Perl et al. 2017). When the legs are placed at right angles to the body the heels overlap. When the leg is stretched along the body the tibiotarsal articulation meets the middle of the eye and the metatarsal articulation reaches slightly beyond the snout. The foot is slightly shorter than the tibia. The toes are webbed at the base and the tips are obtusely rounded with a relative length of 4 > 3 > 5 > 2 > 1 (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). There is a broadening of toes III and IV; females typically have a broadening of the 3rd phalanx of toe III and both the 3rd and 4th phalanx on toe IV while the 2nd phalanx in males is broadened on toe III and the 3rd phalanx of toe IV. Males have dark nuptial pads, keratinised excrescences on the thorax, ventral surface of the limbs, and planter parts of the outer edge of the webbing during the breeding season (Perl et al. 2017). At gosner stage 24, tadpoles of L. nigriventer were approximately 14 mm and at stage 34 they were 24 mm (Perl et al. 2017). Tadpoles have a maximum length of 26 mm (Renan et al. 2017). Their bodies are longer than wide or deep. The distance from the nostril to the snout is three-quarters the distance from the eye to the nostril. The distance between the eyes is two-thirds the length of the mouth. The lips are bordered by a single row of papillae with a break in the middle of the upper lip. There are two labial tooth series on the top and three on the bottom. The third tooth series on the lower jaw has an interruption in the middle. The first series on both the top and bottom each have one row of teeth. The other series each have two rows of teeth (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). The spiracle is located ventrally and medially (Perl et al. 2017). The width of the spiraculum is a quarter the width of the mouth. The tail has an obtusely rounded tip. The tail muscles end proximally. The tail has a dorsal crest that extends onto the dorsum slightly (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). Latonia nigriventer differs from Discoglossus pictus in having a wider interocular distance, longer forelimbs, and a snout that projects less. Additionally, the two species can be differentiated by the darker ventral coloration in L. nigriventer (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943).Tadpoles of L. nigriventer can be differentiated from D. pictus by the former having a shorter nostril-snout compared to eye to nostril distance, a mouth that is wider than the interocular distance, and a spiracle that is narrower than the length of the mouth (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). The tadpoles can be further differentiated from other species with overlapping or nearby ranges, Bufotes variabilis, Hyla savignyi, Pelophylax bedriagae and Pelobates syriacus, by the focal species possessing a medial ventral spiracle, distinct epidermal reticulations, and double keratodont row, which are only found in L. nigriventer, Hoplobatrachus and extinct basal anurans from Discoglossus and Ascaphus (Perl et al. 2017).Newly metamorphosed frogs ranged in snout-vent length from 6 – 9 mm (Perl et al. 2017). In life, L. nigriventer has a dark belly (as its name implies) with small white spots. The dorsal pattern is ochre and rust colored patches grading into dark olive-grey to greyish-black (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). There is a light-colored, incomplete mid-dorsal band on the posterior portion of the dorsum (Perl et al 2017). Tadpoles of L. nigriventer are uniformly brown on the dorsum and unpigmented on the ventrum and on the ventral surface of the spiracle (Perl et al. 2017). Despite differences in distinctiveness and contrast, color patterns between individuals were similar. Keratinised excrescences can be found on dorsal surfaces of the feet of some male during the breeding and some females may have excrescences on the plantar surfaces, webbing edge, and sparsely on the thorax.Statistically, there is no difference between the sexes. However, females had weaker webbing than males and the sexes differ in which phalanx of toes III and IV are broadened (Perl et al. 2017).The species authority is: Mendelssohn, H. and Steinitz, H. (1943). ''A new frog from Palestine.'' Copeia, 4, 231-233.Prior to the rediscovery of this species, only two specimens exist: one type specimen, collected by Mendelssohn in 1940 (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943), and one collected by Steinitz in 1955 (Werner 1988). The two tadpole paratypes have been lost (Biton et al. 2013) and one additional specimen collected by Mendelssohn in 1940 was eaten by the other while both were kept alive in a terrarium (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943).Since the single adult specimen collected in 1955, Latonia nigriventer was not seen until 15 November 2011, four decades later, by a Park Ranger, who was unsure of the identity of the adult frog (Boaz Shacham, pers.com.). Its identification has since been confirmed and will certainly renew interest in its conservation (Biton et a. 2013. As of 2017, total of 175 L. nigriventer have been observed. Of the observed frogs, 64 were adult females, 42, adult males, 29 juveniles, and 40 tadpoles (Perl et al. 2017). Through the sequencing of 2,503 bp DNA from three mitochondrial genes and three nuclear genes it was found that the L. nigriventer belongs in the genus Latonia. Latonia nigriventer is the only extant species in the Latonia genus. This places it in the Alytidae family. Its closest relative are the frogs of the Discoglossus genus, followed by frogs of the Alytes genus (Biton et al. 2013). (image, http://amphibiaweb.org/images/amazing/amazing_logo.jpg) Featured in Amazing Amphibians on 24 June 2013 (http://amphibiaweb.org/amazing_amphibians/20130624_Disco_nigriventer.html)

References

  • Biton, R., Geffen, E., Vences, M., Cohen, O., Bailon, S., Rabinovich, R., Malka, Y., Oron, T., Boistel, R., Brumfeld, V., Gafny, S. (2013). ''The rediscovered Hula painted frog is a living fossil.'' Nature Communications, 4(1959), 1-6.
  • IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group,. 2012. Latonia nigriventer. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012: e.T6715A13339841. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T6715A13339841.en. Downloaded on 30 November 2017
  • Mendelssohn, H. and Steinitz, H. (1943). ''A new frog from Palestine.'' Copeia, 4, 231-233.
  • Papenfuss T., Disi A., Anderson S., Kuzmin S., Gasith A., Sadek R.A., Werner Y. 2004. Discoglossus nigriventer. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. . Downloaded on 25 November 2011.
  • Perl, R., Gafny, S., Malka, Y., Renan, S., Woodhams, D., Rollins-Smith, L., Pask, J., Bletz, M., Geffen, E., Vences, M. (2017). ''Natural history and conservation of the rediscovered Hula painted frog, Latonia nigriventer.'' Contributions to Zoology Bijdragen tot de dierkunde, 86, 11-37.
  • Renan, S., Gafny, S., Perl, R. G. B., Roll, U., Malka, Y., Vences, M. Geffen, E. (2017). ''Living quarters of a living fossil - Uncovering the current distribution pattern of the rediscovered Hula painted frog (Latonia nigriventer) using environmental DNA.'' Molecular Ecology, 00, 1–12.
  • Werner, Y. L. (1988). ''Herpetofaunal survey of Israel (1950-85), with comments on Sinai and Jordan and on zoogeographic heterogeneity.'' The Zoogeography of Israel. Y. Yom-Tov and E. Chernov, eds., Junk, Dordrecht, 355-388.

license
cc-by-3.0
author
Arie van der Meijden
author
Ann T. Chang
author
Darren Ayoub
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Distribution and Habitat

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
Latoina nigriventer can be found at the Hula Nature Reserve in the Hula Valley of Northern Israel (Biton et al. 2013) and at two sites located 1 km southeast of the reserve near the village of Yesod HaMa’ala (Perl et al. 2017). It is assumed to be at Hgamon Ha-Hula Nature Park, Ein Te’o Nature Reserve based on environmental DNA. The species appears to have strong preference to its historic marsh, swamp, and lake habitats but can also be found to less optimal sites, possibly by using a complex network of canals and streams that flow mainly from the north to the south and from the east and west to the center of the valley (Renan et al. 2017). The species utilizes both terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Within the Hula marshes, individuals were found in decomposing leaf litter on peaty, damp, and loose soil, in dense blackberry thickets, in reeds, and among fig trees. At the Yesod HaMa’ala sites individuals were found in and around ditches with permanent water, mud bottoms, and vegetation. The soil around ditches was composed of sandy, compressed mineral soil. Individuals found in terrestrial sites were found under drying grass tufts or in crab or small mammal holes at the water’s edge (Perl et al. 2017).
license
cc-by-3.0
author
Arie van der Meijden
author
Ann T. Chang
author
Darren Ayoub
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
Individuals are nocturnal and solitary and can be found almost year round (Perl et al. 2017). Analysis based on environmental DNA techniques and modeling with presence-absence data, show that L. nigriventer has a strong preference for its historical marsh, swamp, and lake habitats but has adapted to man-made sites such as ditches. The occurrences of organic and colluvial-alluvial soil types, indicating the current or past presence of a wetland, are correlated with positive environmental DNA results (Renan et al. 2017). From November to March, juveniles were found on land under humid leaf litter. From February to September, which is assumed to be their breeding season, adults could be found in water with only their rostrum exposed. Individuals are sensitive to artificial light (Perl et al. 2017). When captured, the terrestrial caught frogs initially did not move, but upon recovery, tried to walk or slowly jump away. When walking, individuals retracted their eyes. When the soil allowed, individuals would produce more mucus and try to move underground head first away from researchers, with their eyes retracted, by pushing back with all their limbs (Perl et al. 2017).When individuals in the water were disturbed they would retreat into the water and try to push head first into dense vegetation (Perl et al. 2017).Based on mark and recapture data, disturbed frogs are known to move distance of more than 20 m. However, three radio tracked individuals only move 2 m over 5 – 18 days (Perl et al. 2017).Dissection of a road-killed female showed several hundred greyish-black oocytes measuring 1.5 – 2.0 mm in diameter. The species is assumed to have opportunistic breeding consisting of short and intense inguinal amplexus, at which time several clutches of eggs are attached stones, aquatic plants, or the bottom of water bodies. The reproductive period is also assumed to be long, possibly from February to September, based on secondary sexual characterizes in males, tadpole presence, and weight loss in recaptured females (Perl et al. 2017). Both sexes produce release calls, which sound similar to advertisement calls. Advertisement calls are of low intensity and frequency that consist of what is presumed to be an expiratory and inspiratory note. Calls were recorded under sub-optimal conditions in a lab setting at air temperatures of 13.5 – 18 degrees C and water temperatures between 14 – 15 degrees C. Calls were produced in series and had inter-call intervals ranging between 246 – 1606 ms. Calls consisted of two continuous notes that are attributed to expiration and inspiration of air into the lungs. Structurally, the notes are spectral, pulsatile, and are only differentiated by the lower frequency and higher intensity of the second note. The dominate frequency ranged from 0 – 1500 Hz. The call duration lasted between 725 – 1212 ms and consisted of a longer first, expiratory note (Perl et al. 2017). The calls are difficult for humans to detect in their natural environment (Renan et al. 2017). Because tadpoles are difficult to find and metamorphs are very small compared to adults, it is assumed that the tadpole stage of L. nigriventer is short (Renan et al. 2017). The small snout-vent length of metamorphs coupled with large adult sizes also indicates the species is long-lived. Small tadpole and juvenile numbers further indicate low reproduction and recruitment and suggest that populations are sustained by long-lived individuals (Perl et al. 2017).The species may be cannibalistic as the species authority reported that the holotype swallowed a smaller adult specimen when they were kept alive in a terrarium together (Mendelssohn and Steinitz 1943). Predators of adult L. nigriventer include White-throated kingfishers (Halcyon smyrnensis). Juveniles and tadpoles are assumed to be preyed upon by other animals that commonly eat amphibians (Perl et al. 2017).
license
cc-by-3.0
author
Arie van der Meijden
author
Ann T. Chang
author
Darren Ayoub
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors

provided by AmphibiaWeb articles
This species was thought to be extinct due to the draining of its wetland habitat in the 1950s until its rediscovery in 2011 (Biton et al. 2013). The Hula marshes were drained to eradicate malaria and to make the land suitable for agriculture use. Only 320 ha of the original 6,000 ha remain unmodified. The remaining 300 ha was set aside as the Hula Nature Reserve. Predation pressure is higher due to the decreased size of the marsh. While most of the area around the marsh is cultivated (IUCN 2012), the majority of the reserve itself is closed to the public (Perl et al. 2017). Latonia nigriventer is now listed as “Critically Endangered” on the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2012), but more populations have been found. Between 2015 and 2017, 175 individuals were observed at four sites (Perl et al. 2017). Environmental DNA techniques have identified an additional 18 sites where individuals have not physically been captured but where their DNA is present. These new sites are mainly clustered around The Hula Nature Reserve, Hgamon Ha-Hula Nature Park, and the Ein Te’o Nature Reserve indicating the importance of habitat reserves to this species (Renan et al. 2017). Habitat destruction and degradation remains the primary threatened to L. nigriventer. However, the species appears to tolerate highly modified and polluted habitats at the Yesod HaMa’ala sites (Perl et al. 2017). Additionally, the species is assumed to be resilient to habitat modification because it has persisted in low density in both artificial habitat and small refugias (Renan et al. 2017). The chytrid fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) was found in 32% of tested L. nigriventer from three of seven examined sites. Infection loads ranged between 1 - 311 genomic equivalents of zoospores per swab. However, the species appears to tolerate Bd and combat it with anti-microbial peptides in its skin secretions (Perl et al. 2017).Based on successful tadpole rearing pilots, a captive breeding program has been recommended for the species (Perl et al. 2017). Using environmental DNA analysis along with vegetation and soil presence-absence data, researcher have constructed predictive maps of suitable habitats. Researchers are also surveying 18 sites identified by environmental DNA as having L. nigriventer for live frogs (Renan et al. 2017).
license
cc-by-3.0
author
Arie van der Meijden
author
Ann T. Chang
author
Darren Ayoub
original
visit source
partner site
AmphibiaWeb articles

Conservation Status

provided by EOL authors

The Hula frog was declared extinct in 1996, after no individuals had been seen for 50 years.It was "rediscovered" in 2011, and in 2012 placed on the IUCN 100 most endangered species list.

IUCN Media Statement Sept 11, 2012.The 100 most threatened species. Are they priceless or worthless?

license
cc-by-3.0
copyright
Dana Campbell
original
visit source
partner site
EOL authors

Hula painted frog

provided by wikipedia EN

The Hula painted frog (Latonia nigriventer) is an amphibian and the only living member of the genus Latonia.[3] The Hula painted frog was thought to be extinct as a result of habitat destruction during the 1950s until the species was rediscovered in 2011. It is endemic to the Lake Hula marshes in Israel.

The draining of Lake Hula and its marshes in the 1950s was thought to have caused the extinction of this frog, along with the cyprinid fish Mirogrex hulensis and cichlid fish Tristramella intermedia.[4] Only five individuals had been found prior to the draining of the lake. Environmental improvements in the Hula reserve have been cited as a possible reason for the frog's reemergence.[5]

Description

The Hula painted frog has a dark belly with small white spots. It is colored ochre above with a rusty colour grading into dark olive-grey to greyish-black on the sides. Differences from the common painted frog (Discoglossus pictus) include its greater interocular distance, longer forelimbs, and a less projecting snout. The type specimen was an adult female with a body length of 40 millimetres (1.6 in)

Little is known about its history, because few specimens have been found by scientists. Two adults and two tadpoles were collected in 1940 and a single specimen was found in 1955. This would prove to be the last record of this species until 2011.[6]

The four 1940 specimens were to be used as types, but the smaller, half-grown frog was eaten by the larger one in captivity.[2]

According to an ecologist of the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, the frog's Hebrew name, agulashon shehor-gahon (Black-bellied round-tongued), derives from its black belly and round tongue. The scientific name of the species reflects these details as well. Unlike the tongues of other frogs, it is not used to catch prey.[7]

This frog was originally proposed to be a member of the genus Discoglossus, but further genetic and morphological assessment after the rediscovery of the species led a reassignment to Genus Latonia, for which no other living examples are known. However, based on phylogenetic analysis, it was estimated that its closest related genus is Discoglossus. On this basis, the Hula painted frog has been labeled a living fossil, the only extant representative of an ancient genetic split.[8][9][10]

Conservation status

In 1996, the IUCN classified this species as "extinct in the wild", the very first amphibian to be given that designation by the IUCN.[1][10] Israel continued to list it as an endangered species in the slim hope that a relict population may be found in the Golan Heights or in southern Lebanon. Following the rediscovery of the species in 2011, the IUCN now considers the frog to be critically endangered as its known habitat occupies less than 2 km2.[1]

In 2000, a scientist from the Lebanese nature protection organisation A Rocha claimed he had seen a frog species which could be Latonia nigriventer in the Aammiq Wetland south of the Beqaa Valley in Lebanon. Two French-Lebanese-British expeditions in the years 2004 and 2005 yielded no confirmation as to the further existence of this species.[11] In August 2010, a search organised by the Amphibian Specialist Group of the International Union for Conservation of Nature set out to look for various species of frogs thought to be extinct in the wild, including the Hula painted frog.[12]

Current Research

In 2013, a study published in Nature Communications revealed that in 2011 during a routine patrol at the Hula Nature Reserve, ranger Yoram Malka found the frog, which he immediately suspected as being the Hula painted frog, as he claimed he has been on the lookout for it for many years. Scientists confirmed that it was one of this rare species.[5][8][9] An ecologist with the Israel Nature and Parks Authority credited the rehydration of the area for the frog sighting.[13] On November 29, a second specimen was located in the same area.[5] The second Hula painted frog, a female, was found in swampy weeds twenty centimeters deep. It weighed 13 grams, half the weight of its male counterpart.[7] Since the discovery of the first specimen, at least ten more individuals have been found, all in the same area.[14]

In 2016, a team led by Professor Sarig Gafni of the Ruppin Academic Center's School of Marine Sciences discovered populations totaling several hundred individuals by searching in water at night, instead of in marsh mud, finding populations in 17 of the 52 Hula Valley water holes they surveyed.[15]

In 2017, an article published in the Molecular Ecology Journal, mentions of a group of scientists who investigated the suitable aquatic habitats for Hula painted frogs using the environmental DNA (eDNA) approach.[16] The Hula Lake once provided a habitat for many rare species including this frog. Since, the 2011 rediscovery of this species in this region (in the Hula nature reserve), consequent efforts to study and protect it started. However, these efforts have been hampered by the elusive nature of this species (that also prevented it being found from the 1950s-2010s). Since, there is a lack of systematic and efficient methodology to detect a rare amphibian or aquatic species, including this Hula painted frogs, they were designated “extinct”; until their rediscovery at a later stage.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is becoming a ‘go-to’ tool for detecting species presence in aquatic environments. eDNA extraction (genetic material extracted through water filtrate) followed by quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR is a technique to amplify genetic material in real time) are highly sensitive methods which can increase the detection probability of rare organisms. To be more reliable the researchers concluded a site to be positive for the presence of Hula painted frogs if the water contains eDNA and if the physical presence of frog is detected as well. Thus, these researchers sampled 52 sites and found that 22 sites were positive for the presence of Hula painted frogs. Most of the positive sites were located in the regions around Hula Nature Reserve, Agamon ha-Hula, and Ein Te’o Nature Reserve. These regions overlap with the former Hula Lake region, and also contain organic, and colluvial-alluvial soils.

Such findings in the regions around reserved parks indicate the importance of nature parks in conservation of wild-life. The suitable habitats predicted by employing the eDNA are of great importance for identifying potential sites for future translocation to save this rare frog.

In 2018, another article published in Nature Scientific Reports, mentioned that this species has low abundance and dispersal capability, calling for urgent conservation measures.[17] The total estimate of potentially reproducing adults in this population (Nad) is found to be 234-235 individuals. They determined the population genetics of this species through a capture-recapture study on 118 adult frogs, and through micro-satellite analysis. Surprisingly, this frog has high genetic diversity (HO = 0.771) and low inbreeding coefficient (FIS = −0.018) with an effective population size estimate (Ne) of ~16–35. It could be due to the presence of one more unknown population or genetic admixture leading to a high genetic diversity and low inbreeding in spite of a less population.

Future research calls for understanding the habitat locations of another population which is not well studied, or different spots within the Hula valley location in which the frog species can be present. The aquatic habitats of this species are prone to disturbance and anthropogenic hazards which could imperil the survival of endangered Hula frogs. Thus outcomes of any future research dealing with prediction of the favorable dwelling habitats of this rare species, and their habitat characterization will be vital to protect the only living member of genus Latonia, by recommending characteristics of safer spots.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group (2021). "Latonia nigriventer". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2021: e.T6715A177694004. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-3.RLTS.T6715A177694004.en. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
  2. ^ a b Mendelssohn, Heinrich; Steinitz, Heinz (1943). "A New Frog from Palestine". Copeia. 1943 (4): 231–233. doi:10.2307/1438135. JSTOR 1438135.
  3. ^ "Amphibian Species of the World: An Online Reference (Version 6)". Reference Reviews. 28 (6): 32–32. 2014-08-12. doi:10.1108/rr-05-2014-0125. ISSN 0950-4125.
  4. ^ "Hula Painted Frog Bounces Back From Extinction". Wired UK. 2011-11-21. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  5. ^ a b c Zafrir, Rinat (November 17, 2011). "Long thought extinct, Hula painted frog found once again in Israeli nature reserve". Haaretz.
  6. ^ "Frog jumps back from extinction". News24. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  7. ^ a b Rinat, Zafrir (2011-11-29). "Second of frog species long thought extinct found in Israel nature reserve Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper". Haaretz.com. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  8. ^ a b Biton, Rebecca; Geffen, Eli; Vences, Miguel; Cohen, Orly; Bailon, Salvador; Rabinovich, Rivka; Malka, Yoram; Oron, Talya; Boistel, Renaud; Brumfeld, Vlad; Gafny, Sarig (4 June 2013). "The rediscovered Hula painted frog is a living fossil". Nature Communications. 4. Article 1959. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.1959B. doi:10.1038/ncomms2959. PMID 23736869.
  9. ^ a b Morelle, Rebecca (2013-06-04). "Rediscovered Hula painted frog 'is a living fossil'". BBC. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  10. ^ a b Than, Ker (4 June 2013). "Frog Long Thought Extinct Is Rediscovered in Israel". National Geographic.
  11. ^ Tron, François (April 2005) Second Discoglossus nigriventer rediscovery expedition in the Central Bekaa valley, Lebanon, A Rocha Lebanon.
  12. ^ Black, Richard (2010-08-09). "Global hunt begins for 'extinct' species of frogs". BBC. Retrieved 2010-08-09.
  13. ^ Fleischman, Danielle (2011-11-17). "'Extinct' frog rediscovered in Israel | Jewish Telegraphic Agency". Jta.org. Retrieved 2013-06-05.
  14. ^ Ed Yong (2013-06-04). "'Extinct' frog is last survivor of its lineage". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.13135. S2CID 88427695. Retrieved 2013-06-07.
  15. ^ Shpigel, Noah (30 April 2016). "Scientists Discover Hula Painted Frog Hasn't Croaked After". Haaretz. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
  16. ^ Renan, Sharon; Gafny, Sarig; Perl, R. G. Bina; Roll, Uri; Malka, Yoram; Vences, Miguel; Geffen, Eli (December 2017). "Living quarters of a living fossil-Uncovering the current distribution pattern of the rediscovered Hula painted frog (Latonia nigriventer) using environmental DNA". Molecular Ecology. 26 (24): 6801–6812. doi:10.1111/mec.14420. ISSN 0962-1083.
  17. ^ Perl, R. G. Bina; Geffen, Eli; Malka, Yoram; Barocas, Adi; Renan, Sharon; Vences, Miguel; Gafny, Sarig (2018-04-03). "Population genetic analysis of the recently rediscovered Hula painted frog (Latonia nigriventer) reveals high genetic diversity and low inbreeding". Scientific Reports. 8 (1). doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23587-w. ISSN 2045-2322.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Hula painted frog: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The Hula painted frog (Latonia nigriventer) is an amphibian and the only living member of the genus Latonia. The Hula painted frog was thought to be extinct as a result of habitat destruction during the 1950s until the species was rediscovered in 2011. It is endemic to the Lake Hula marshes in Israel.

The draining of Lake Hula and its marshes in the 1950s was thought to have caused the extinction of this frog, along with the cyprinid fish Mirogrex hulensis and cichlid fish Tristramella intermedia. Only five individuals had been found prior to the draining of the lake. Environmental improvements in the Hula reserve have been cited as a possible reason for the frog's reemergence.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN