dcsimg

Untitled

provided by Animal Diversity Web

The cookie-cutter shark often swallows and digests its teeth, which is thought to aid in calcification of the skeleton. Shark copulation is still very much a mystery and has never been observed in the wild (Compagno 1984, Stoakely 1997)

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Miller, J. 1999. "Isistius brasiliensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Isistius_brasiliensis.html
author
James Miller, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Conservation Status

provided by Animal Diversity Web

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Miller, J. 1999. "Isistius brasiliensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Isistius_brasiliensis.html
author
James Miller, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Benefits

provided by Animal Diversity Web

They have a potential negative impact on fisheries, as they prey on commercially important fish, but damage is slight. The attacks on submarines are considered at most a nuisance. Because of its small size, and deep water habitat, this species is of little or no danger to swimmers and divers.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Miller, J. 1999. "Isistius brasiliensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Isistius_brasiliensis.html
author
James Miller, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Trophic Strategy

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Like many sharks, the cookie-cutter shark is a carnivore. It attaches itself to its prey with its strong sucking mouth, and then twists about, using its sharp lower teeth to slice out a plug of flesh, which can sometimes be twice as deep as its diameter. It then uses its hook-like upper teeth to hold the plug, while the lower teeth scoop the plug out. Detaching, it swims away to enjoy its meal. It preys on deep water organisms, including crustaceans, squid, large bony fishes, cetaceans, and even large sharks. It is bioluminescent, able to emit a greenish light from its belly. It may use this light to attract the attention of potential victims (Compagno 1984, Roesch 1997).

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Miller, J. 1999. "Isistius brasiliensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Isistius_brasiliensis.html
author
James Miller, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Distribution

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Pelagic: The cookie-cutter shark is found in seas as far north as Japan and south to Southern Australia. It is a deep-water fish, and wide-ranging, often found near islands.

Biogeographic Regions: atlantic ocean (Native ); pacific ocean (Native )

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Miller, J. 1999. "Isistius brasiliensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Isistius_brasiliensis.html
author
James Miller, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Habitat

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Cookie-cutter sharks are wide-ranging creatures, found in tropical oceanic climates all across the world. They tend to be found closer to islands, but they have been caught in open sea, as well.

Aquatic Biomes: benthic ; reef ; coastal

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Miller, J. 1999. "Isistius brasiliensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Isistius_brasiliensis.html
author
James Miller, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Morphology

provided by Animal Diversity Web

The cookie-cutter shark is a typical member of the dogfish order; it has no anal fin, a thin, cigar shaped body, and short snout. It has suctorial lips, small upper teeth, and large, triangular cusped lower teeth in 25 to 32 rows. Coloration is medium grey to grey-brown, with a dark collar marking its throat. Females are larger than males, reaching perhaps 20 inches at full size. (Compagno 1984)

Other Physical Features: bilateral symmetry

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Miller, J. 1999. "Isistius brasiliensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Isistius_brasiliensis.html
author
James Miller, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Reproduction

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Reproduction of the cookie-cutter shark is accomplished through internal fertilization. The male has instead two 'claspers' (pterygopodes), located on his underside in the rear. Fertilization is accomplished by his insertion of one of his claspers into the female's cloaca. Like other small sharks, this shark is oviparous, and the female coats her eggs in a horny casing before attaching them to rocks and seaweed. Hatching can take place after 12 to 22 months. When the young emerge, they are fully developed and capable of hunting for themselves. Males mature at approximately 14 inches and grow to a size of 16 inches, while females mature at 16 inches and reach up to 20 inches (Stoakely 1997).

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Miller, J. 1999. "Isistius brasiliensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Isistius_brasiliensis.html
author
James Miller, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Morphology

provided by Fishbase
Dorsal spines (total): 0; Dorsal soft rays (total): 0; Analspines: 0; Analsoft rays: 0; Vertebrae: 81 - 89
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Cristina V. Garilao
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Migration

provided by Fishbase
Oceanodromous. Migrating within oceans typically between spawning and different feeding areas, as tunas do. Migrations should be cyclical and predictable and cover more than 100 km.
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Kent E. Carpenter
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Diagnostic Description

provided by Fishbase
The cookiecutter shark Isistius brasiliensis is distinctive for the prominent dark collar marking around its throat, large nearly symmetrical caudal fin with a long ventral lobe over 2/3 length of dorsal caudal margin, and moderately large lower teeth in 25-32 rows. Eyes set anterior of head but sufficiently far back to lack an extensive anterior binocular field. Pectoral fins subquadrate; pelvic fins larger than dorsal fins (Ref.247). Tooth count: 30-37/25-31. Vertebral count: 81-89. Spiral valve count: 8-10 (Ref. 48844). Dark brown dorsally, paler ventrally except for blackish band across throat; tips of caudal lobe blackish (Ref. 6577). As with the other member of the genus Isistius , it has a characteristic small cigar-shaped body with two small close-set spineless dorsal fins far posterior on back, no anal fin, huge, triangular-cusped teeth without blades, short, bulbous snout and a unique suctorial lips (Ref. 247).
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Cristina V. Garilao
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Life Cycle

provided by Fishbase
Presumably ovoviviparous; 6 or 7 large eggs have been found in ovaries (Ref. 247). Distinct pairing with embrace (Ref. 205). Viviparous, without a yolk sac placenta, 6-12 young per litter. Males mature at about 36 cm, with a maximum length of 42 cm; females mature at 39 cm, with a maximum length of 56 cm. Size at birth is unknown. (Ref. 48844).
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Cristina V. Garilao
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Biology

provided by Fishbase
Oceanic species (Ref. 247). Epi- to bathypelagic at 1-3500 m (Ref. 58302). Makes diurnal vertical migrations from below 1,000 m in the day to or near the surface at night (Ref. 6871, 58302). Travels long vertical distances in excess of 2,000 to 3,000 m on a diel cycle (Ref. 247). Feeds free-living deepwater prey such as large squid, gonostomatids, crustaceans but is also a facultative ectoparasite on larger pelagic animals such as wahoo, tuna, billfishes, and cetaceans (Ref. 247). Ovoviviparous (Ref. 205), with 6-12 young per litter (Ref. 48844). The cookiecutter shark has specialized suctorial lips and a strongly modified pharynx that allow it to attach to the sides of it prey (Ref. 247). It then drives its saw-like lower dentition into the skin and flesh of its victim, twists about to cut out a conical plug of flesh, then pull free with the plug cradled by its scoop-like lower jaw and held by the hook-like upper teeth (Ref. 247). Teeth are shed as a complete unit; the lower teeth are swallowed, perhaps to maintain sufficient calcium levels in its body (Ref. 247). Interconnection at the bases of individual tooth allows a whole row of teeth to move if one tooth is touched. This shark is reported to radiate light for as long as three hours after its death. Not dangerous to people because of its small size and habitat preferences (Ref. 247).
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Kent E. Carpenter
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Importance

provided by Fishbase
fisheries: minor commercial; price category: unknown; price reliability:
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Kent E. Carpenter
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

分布

provided by The Fish Database of Taiwan
分布於南、北緯30℃之間的世界各大洋,主要分布於中太平洋。臺灣分布於北部海域。
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
臺灣魚類資料庫
author
臺灣魚類資料庫

利用

provided by The Fish Database of Taiwan
偶由延繩釣、流刺網或底拖網捕獲,非重要之食用魚,一般以加工食之。
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
臺灣魚類資料庫
author
臺灣魚類資料庫

描述

provided by The Fish Database of Taiwan
體正圓柱形,細長;頭稍寬扁,頭長稍小於吻端到尾鰭起點長的1/4;吻頗短,厚而肉質,眼前吻長約等於眼徑;眼卵圓形,後端尖,眼徑約為口前吻長的1/2;鼻孔小,約為眼徑的1/3,甚近吻端,斜位,前鼻瓣小,三角形突出;噴水孔位頭背面,卵圓形,孔徑為眼徑的1/2,位於眼睛後上方;口裂橫平,上唇發達,口角具翼狀厚唇褶,下顎後方無下唇褶;口角外側具一頗長之斜行深溝;齒上下顎不同形;上顎有一較小而直立的正中齒,每側約15-16齒,稍外斜;下顎齒大而直立,正中齒與兩側齒等大,每側12-15齒,基底長方形,兩側互相重疊,齒冠呈側扁三角形,齒緣光滑;上顎齒3-4行在使用,下顎齒一行在使用;鰓裂較小,位於體側中央;盾鱗近方形,基板大,棘突方形而低平,各鱗間稍有縫隙。背鰭兩枚,無棘,後位而頗小;第一背鰭上角廣圓,後角尖,其長約等於基底長,基底末端與腹鰭起點相對或稍後;第二背鰭與第一背鰭同形,但基底稍長,面積亦稍大,其起點約在腹鰭後角上方;兩背鰭間距約為第一背鰭基底長的兩倍,第二背鰭基底末端到尾鰭起點距離超過第二背鰭基底長的兩倍;兩背鰭的高度幾乎相同;尾鰭近乎正形尾;上葉發達,具缺刻,後緣截形;腹鰭大於兩背鰭;胸鰭,長大於寬,胸鰭長約為頭長的2/5,外角和內角鈍圓。體背暗褐色,腹部淺色。胸鰭前方鰓裂處有一條明顯的黑褐色環帶。鰭褐色,胸鰭、背鰭和腹鰭後緣具淡白色邊緣,尾鰭上下葉呈暗褐色。身體腹部有發光器官,能發綠光。
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
臺灣魚類資料庫
author
臺灣魚類資料庫

棲地

provided by The Fish Database of Taiwan
深海小型鯊,夜晚常到水體上層,晝夜垂直洄游,常在水深85~3500公尺處。最長約50公分,雄成鯊31-39公分,雌成鯊長38-50公分。卵胎生。可營外部寄生生活,具吸吮式嘴唇,能吸附在大魚或鯨豚身上,用剃刀狀下顎齒咬破皮膚和肉;亦捕食甲殼類及烏賊等軟體動物。
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
臺灣魚類資料庫
author
臺灣魚類資料庫

Cookiecutter shark

provided by wikipedia EN

The cookiecutter shark (Isistius brasiliensis), also called the cigar shark, is a species of small squaliform shark in the family Dalatiidae. This shark occurs in warm, oceanic waters worldwide, particularly near islands, and has been recorded as deep as 3.7 km (2.3 mi). It migrates vertically up to 3 km (1.9 mi) every day, approaching the surface at dusk and descending with the dawn. Reaching only 42–56 cm (16.5–22 in) in length, the cookiecutter shark has a long, cylindrical body with a short, blunt snout, large eyes, two tiny spineless dorsal fins, and a large caudal fin. It is dark brown, with light-emitting photophores covering its underside except for a dark "collar" around its throat and gill slits.

The name "cookiecutter shark" refers to its feeding habit of gouging round plugs, as if cut out with a cookie cutter, out of larger animals. Marks made by cookiecutter sharks have been found on a wide variety of marine mammals and fishes, as well as on submarines, undersea cables, and even human bodies. It also consumes whole smaller prey such as squid. Cookiecutter sharks have adaptations for hovering in the water column and likely rely on stealth and subterfuge to capture more active prey. Its dark collar seems to mimic the silhouette of a small fish, while the rest of its body blends into the downwelling light via its ventral photophores. When a would-be predator approaches the lure, the shark attaches itself using its suctorial lips and specialized pharynx and neatly excises a chunk of the flesh using its bandsaw-like set of lower teeth. This species has been known to travel in schools.

Though rarely encountered because of its oceanic habitat, a handful of documented attacks on humans were apparently caused by cookiecutter sharks. Nevertheless, this diminutive shark is not regarded as dangerous to humans. The International Union for Conservation of Nature has listed the cookiecutter shark under least concern, as it is widely distributed, has no commercial value, and is not particularly susceptible to fisheries.

Taxonomy

French naturalists Jean René Constant Quoy and Joseph Paul Gaimard originally described the cookiecutter shark during the 1817–1820 exploratory voyage of the corvette Uranie under Louis de Freycinet, giving it the name Scymnus brasiliensis because the type specimen was caught off Brazil. In 1824, their account was published as part of Voyage autour du monde...sur les corvettes de S.M. l'Uranie et la Physicienne, Louis de Freycinet's 13 volume report on the voyage.[2][3] In 1865, American ichthyologist Theodore Nicholas Gill coined the new genus Isistius for this species, after Isis, the Egyptian goddess of light.[4][5]

One of the earliest accounts of the wounds left by the cookiecutter shark on various animals is in ancient Samoan legend, which held that atu (skipjack tuna) entering Palauli Bay would leave behind pieces of their flesh as a sacrifice to Tautunu, the community chief. In later centuries, various other explanations for the wounds were advanced, including lampreys, bacteria, and invertebrate parasites.[6][7] In 1971, Everet Jones of the U.S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (a predecessor of the National Marine Fisheries Service) discovered the cigar shark, as the cookiecutter shark was then generally known, was responsible. Shark expert Stewart Springer thus popularized the name "cookiecutter shark" for this species (though he originally called them "demon whale-biters").[8] Other common names used for this shark include luminous shark, smalltooth cookiecutter shark, and smooth cookiecutter shark.[9]

Description

The cookiecutter shark has an elongated, cigar-shaped body with a short, bulbously rounded snout. The nostrils have a very short flap of skin in front. The large, oval, green eyes are placed forward on the head, though not so that binocular vision is extensive. Behind the eyes are large spiracles, positioned on the upper surface of the head.

The mouth is short, forming a nearly transverse line, and is surrounded by enlarged, fleshy, suctorial lips. About 30–37 tooth rows are in the upper jaw and 25–31 tooth rows are in the lower jaw, increasing with body size. The upper and lower teeth are extremely different; the upper teeth are small, narrow, and upright, tapering to a single, smooth-edged cusp. The lower teeth are also smooth-edged, but much larger, broader, and knife-like, with their bases interlocking to form a single saw-like cutting edge. The five pairs of gill slits are small.[3][5][6]

The pectoral fins are short and roughly trapezoidal in shape. Two spineless dorsal fins are placed far back on the body, the first originating just ahead of the pelvic fins and the second located just behind. The second dorsal fin is slightly larger than the first, and the pelvic fins are larger than either. The anal fin is absent. The caudal fin is broad, with the lower lobe almost as large as the upper, which has a prominent ventral notch.[3][6] The dermal denticles are squarish and flattened, with a slight central concavity and raised corners. The cookiecutter shark is chocolate brown in color, becoming subtly lighter below, and a dark "collar" wraps around the gill region.

The fins have translucent margins, except for the caudal fin, which has a darker margin.[5] Complex, light-producing organs called photophores densely cover the entire underside, except for the collar, and produce a vivid green glow.[5] The maximum recorded length for this species is 42 cm (17 in) for males and 56 cm (22 in) for females.[9]

Distribution and habitat

Inhabiting all of the world's major tropical and warm-temperate oceanic basins, the cookiecutter shark is most common between the latitudes of 20°N and 20°S, where the surface water temperature is 18–26 °C (64–79 °F).[3] In the Atlantic, it has been reported off the Bahamas and southern Brazil in the west, Cape Verde, Guinea to Sierra Leone, southern Angola, and South Africa in the east, and Ascension Island in the south. In the Indo-Pacific region, it has been caught from Mauritius to New Guinea, Australia, and New Zealand, including Tasmania and Lord Howe Island, as well as off Japan. In the central and eastern Pacific, it occurs from Fiji north to the Hawaiian Islands, and east to the Galápagos, Easter, and Guadalupe Islands. Fresh wounds observed on marine mammals suggest this shark may range as far as California in warm years.[3][5][6]

Based on catch records, the cookiecutter shark appears to conduct a diel vertical migration up to 3 km (1.9 mi) each way.[6] It spends the day at a depth of 1–3.7 km (0.62–2.30 mi), and at night it rises into the upper water column, usually remaining below 85 m (279 ft), but on rare occasions venturing to the surface.[1][5] This species may be more tolerant of low dissolved oxygen levels than sharks in the related genera Euprotomicrus and Squaliolus.[6] It is frequently found near islands, perhaps for reproductive purposes or because they hold congregations of large prey animals.[6] In the northeastern Atlantic, most adults are found between 11°N and 16°N, with the smallest and largest individuals being found in lower and higher latitudes, respectively.[10] There is no evidence of sex segregation.[11]

Biology and ecology

Ventral view of a shark's head with teeth visible in the open mouth
The suctorial lips and large lower teeth of the cookiecutter sharks are adaptations for its parasitic lifestyle.

Best known for biting neat round chunks of tissue from marine mammals and large fish, the cookiecutter shark is considered a facultative ectoparasite, as it also wholly ingests smaller prey. It has a wide gape and a very strong bite, by virtue of heavily calcified cranial and labial cartilages.[12] With small fins and weak muscles, this ambush predator spends much of its time hovering in the water column.[6][13] To maintain neutral buoyancy, its liver, which can comprise some 35% of its weight, is rich in low-density lipids. As this species has higher skeletal density than Euprotomicrus or Squaliolus, its body cavity and liver are proportionately much larger, and the oil content is much higher.[6][14] Its large caudal fin allows for a quick burst of speed to catch larger, faster prey that come in range.[14]

The cookiecutter shark regularly replaces its teeth like other sharks, but sheds its lower teeth in entire rows rather than one at a time. A cookiecutter shark 14 cm (5.5 in) long has been calculated to have shed 15 sets of lower teeth by the time it is 50 cm (20 in) long, totaling 435–465 teeth.[11] This represents a significant investment of resources and is probably why the shark swallows its old sets of teeth, so that it can recycle the calcium content.[6] Unlike other sharks, the retina of the cookiecutter shark has ganglion cells concentrated in a concentric area rather than in a horizontal streak across the visual field; this may help to focus on prey in front of the shark.[15] This fat shark has been known to travel in schools, which may increase the effectiveness of its lure (see below), as well as discourage counterattacks by much larger predators.[12]

Bioluminescence

a small shark lying belly-up, with a clear dark brown band around the throat
The dark collar of the cookiecutter shark is believed to act as a lure.

The intrinsic green luminescence of the cookiecutter shark is the strongest known of any shark, and has been reported to persist for three hours after it has been taken out of water.[8][14][16][17] The ventrally positioned photophores serve to disrupt its silhouette from below by matching the downwelling light, a strategy known as counter-illumination, that is common among bioluminescent organisms of the mesopelagic zone. The individual photophores are set around the denticles and are small enough that they cannot be discerned by the naked eye, suggesting they have evolved to fool animals with high visual acuity and/or at close distances.[12]

Set apart from the glowing underside, the darker, nonluminescent collar tapers at both sides of the throat, and has been hypothesized to serve as a lure by mimicking the silhouette of a small fish from below. The appeal of the lure would be multiplied in a school of sharks. If the collar does function in this way, the cookiecutter shark would be the only known case of bioluminescence in which the absence of light attracts prey, while its photophores serve to prevent premature detection by incoming would-be predators.[12][13] As the shark can only match a limited range of light intensities, its vertical movements likely serve to preserve the effectiveness of its disguise across various times of day and weather conditions.[12]

Feeding

a silvery fish with round concavities gouged from its side
Pomfrets are one of the many species parasitized by the cookiecutter shark.

Virtually every type of medium- to large-sized oceanic animal sharing the habitat of the cookiecutter shark is open to attack; bite scars have been found on cetaceans (including porpoises, dolphins, beaked whales, sperm whales and baleen whales), pinnipeds (including fur seals, leopard seals and elephant seals), dugongs, larger sharks (including blue sharks, goblin sharks, basking sharks, great white sharks, megamouth sharks and smalltooth sand tiger sharks), stingrays (including deepwater stingrays, pelagic stingrays and sixgill stingrays), and bony fishes (including billfishes, tunas, dolphinfishes, jacks, escolars, opahs, and pomfrets).[3][14][18][19] The cookiecutter shark also regularly hunts and eats entire squid with a mantle length of 15–30 cm (5.9–11.8 in), comparable in size to the shark itself, as well as bristlemouths, copepods, and other prey of more modest dimensions.[11]

The flank of a stranded whale, showing several round scars
Round scars from cookiecutter shark bites are found on many cetaceans, such as this beached Gray's beaked whale.

Parasitic attacks by the cookiecutter shark leave a round "crater wound", averaging 5 cm (2.0 in) across and 7 cm (2.8 in) deep.[20] The prevalence of these attacks can be high: off Hawaii, nearly every adult spinner dolphin bears scars from this species.[21] Diseased or otherwise weakened animals appear to be more susceptible, and in the western Atlantic observations have been made of emaciated beached melon-headed whales with dozens to hundreds of recent and healing cookiecutter shark wounds, while such wounds are rare on nonemaciated beached whales.[22] The impact of parasitism on prey species, in terms of resources diverted from growth or reproduction, is uncertain.[21]

The cookiecutter shark exhibits a number of specializations to its mouth and pharynx for its parasitic lifestyle. The shark first secures itself to the body surface of its prey by closing its spiracles and retracting its basihyal (tongue) to create pressure lower than that of the surroundings; its suctorial lips ensure a tight seal.[12][14] It then bites, using its narrow upper teeth as anchors while its razor sharp lower teeth slice into the prey. Finally, the shark twists and rotates its body to complete a circular cut, quite possibly aided by the initial forward momentum and subsequent struggles of its prey.[12] The action of the lower teeth may also be assisted by back-and-forth vibrations of the jaw, a mechanism akin to that of an electric carving knife.[20] This shark's ability to create strong suction into its mouth is likely also of use in capturing smaller prey such as squid.[12]

Life history

Like other dogfish sharks, the cookiecutter shark is aplacental viviparous, with the developing embryos being sustained by yolk until birth. Females have two functional uteri and give birth to litters of 6 to 12 pups.[3][23] A case has been recorded of a female carrying 9 embryos 12.4–13.7 cm (4.9–5.4 in) long; though they were close to the birth size, they still had well-developed yolk sacs, suggesting a slow rate of yolk absorption and a long gestation period. The embryos had developed brown pigmentation, but not the dark collar or differentiated dentition. Newborn cookiecutter sharks measure 14–15 cm (5.5–5.9 in) long.[23] Males attain sexual maturity at a length of 36 cm (14 in), and females at a length of 39 cm (15 in).[3]

Human interactions

dorsal view of the front part of a small shark
A cookiecutter shark is caught on a longline near Hawaii; large spiracles are located behind the eyes.

Favoring offshore waters and thus seldom encountered by humans, the cookiecutter shark is not considered dangerous because of its small size. However, it has been implicated in a few attacks; in one case, a school of 30-cm (12 in) long fish with blunt snouts attacked an underwater photographer on an open-ocean dive. Similar reports have come from shipwreck survivors, of suffering small, clean, deep bites during night time.[3][14] In March 2009, Maui resident Mike Spalding was bitten by a cookiecutter shark while swimming across Alenuihaha Channel.[24][25] Swimmer Eric Schall was bitten by a cookiecutter shark March 31, 2019 while crossing the Kaiwi Channel and suffered a large laceration to his stomach.[26] A second cookiecutter attack occurred in the same spot three weeks later. Isaiah Mojica was attempting the channel swim April 6, 2019 as part of the Oceans Seven challenge when he was bitten on the left shoulder.[27] A third person attempting to complete the swim was bitten in nearly the same area of the channel. Adherbal Treidler de Oliveira was attempting the swim July 29, 2019, when he was bitten once on the stomach and then a second time on the left thigh.[28] Two of the three swimmers were using electrical shark deterrents which did not deter the sharks. In 2017, a seven year old boy, Jack Tolley, was bitten in the leg while wading in Alma Bay in North Queensland with his family.[29] The shark caused a 7.3 cm wound that was nearly down to the bone. On February 9, 2022, a deepwater swimmer was off Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, when they were bitten on the right foot and calf.[30] In March 2023, Andy Walberer was attacked by two cookiecutter sharks while swimming the Molokai channel. He was able to grab and throw both sharks before serious injury was inflicted. [31]

There are several records of bodies recovered from the water with post-mortem cookiecutter shark bites.[14][32][33]

During the 1970s, several U.S. Navy submarines were forced back to base to repair damage caused by cookiecutter shark bites to the neoprene boots of their AN/BQR-19 sonar domes, which caused the sound-transmitting oil inside to leak and impaired navigation. An unknown enemy weapon was initially feared, before this shark was identified as the culprit, and the problem was solved by installing fiberglass covers around the domes.[18][34] In the 1980s, some 30 U.S. Navy submarines were damaged by cookiecutter shark bites, mostly to the rubber-sheathed electric cable leading to the sounding probe used to ensure safety when surfacing in shipping zones. Again, the solution was to apply a fiberglass coating.[35] Oceanographic equipment and telecommunications cables have also been damaged by this species.[3][18]

The harm inflicted by cookiecutter sharks on fishing nets and economically important species may have a minor negative effect on commercial fisheries.[6][35] The shark itself is too small to be of value, and is only infrequently taken, as bycatch, on pelagic longlines and in midwater trawls and plankton nets. The lack of significant population threats, coupled with a worldwide distribution, has led the IUCN to assess the cookiecutter shark as of least concern.[1] In June 2018 the New Zealand Department of Conservation classified the cookiecutter shark as "Not Threatened" with the qualifier "Secure Overseas" under the New Zealand Threat Classification System.[36]

References

  1. ^ a b c Kyne, P.M. (2018). "Isistius brasiliensis". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2018: e.T41830A2956761. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T41830A2956761.en. Retrieved November 12, 2021.
  2. ^ Quoy, J.R.C.; J.P. Gaimard (1824–1825). "des Poissons. Chapter IX". In de Freycinet, L (ed.). Voyage autour du Monde...exécuté sur les corvettes de L. M. "L'Uranie" et "La Physicienne," pendant les années 1817, 1818, 1819 et 1820. Paris. pp. 192–401.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Ebert, D.A. (2003). Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras of California. University of California Press. pp. 73–75. ISBN 978-0-520-23484-0.
  4. ^ Gill, T.N. (1865). "Synopsis of the eastern American sharks". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 16 (5): 258–265.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Bester, C. Biological Profiles: Cookiecutter Shark Archived April 9, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Florida Museum of Natural History Ichthyology Department. Retrieved on January 26, 2010.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Compagno, L.J.V. (1984). Sharks of the World: An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark Species Known to Date. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization. p. 93–95. ISBN 978-92-5-101384-7.
  7. ^ Jones, E.C. (1971). "Isistius brasiliensis, a Squaloid Shark, the Probable Cause of Crater Wounds on Fishes and Cetaceans" (PDF). Fisheries Bulletin. 69 (4): 791–798.
  8. ^ a b Bright, M. (2000). The Private Life of Sharks: The Truth Behind the Myth. Stackpole Books. p. 215. ISBN 978-0-8117-2875-1.
  9. ^ a b Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.) (2009). "Isistius brasiliensis" in FishBase. November 2009 version.
  10. ^ Muñoz-Chápuli, R.; J.C. Rey Salgado & J. M. De La Serna (1988). "Biogeography of Isistius brasiliensis in the north-eastern Atlantic, inferred from crater wounds on swordfish (Xiphias gladius)". Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 68 (2): 315–321. doi:10.1017/S0025315400052218. S2CID 86259333.
  11. ^ a b c Strasburg, D.W. (March 30, 1963). "The Diet and Dentition of Isistius brasiliensis, with Remarks on Tooth Replacement in Other Sharks". Copeia. 1963 (1): 33–40. doi:10.2307/1441272. JSTOR 1441272.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h Widder, E.A. (November 1998). "A predatory use of counterillumination by the squaloid shark, Isistius brasiliensis". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 53 (3): 267–273. doi:10.1023/A:1007498915860. S2CID 45347124.
  13. ^ a b Milius, S. (August 1, 1998). Glow-in-the-dark shark has killer smudge. Science News. Retrieved on December 15, 2014.
  14. ^ a b c d e f g Martin, R.A. Deep Sea: Cookiecutter Shark. ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Retrieved on January 26, 2010.
  15. ^ Bozzano, A.; S.P. Collin (April 2000). "Retinal ganglion cell topography in elasmobranchs". Brain, Behavior and Evolution. 55 (4): 191–208. doi:10.1159/000006652. PMID 10940662. S2CID 26648368.
  16. ^ Hoar, W.S.; D.J. Randall & F.P. Conte (1969). Fish Physiology: Reproduction and Growth, Bioluminescence, Pigments, and Poisons. Academic Press. p. 385. ISBN 978-0-12-350403-6.
  17. ^ Glenday, C., ed. (2013). Guinness World Records. Random House LLC. p. 63. ISBN 978-0345547118.
  18. ^ a b c Martin, R.A. Squaliformes: Dogfish Sharks. ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Retrieved on January 26, 2010.
  19. ^ Hoyos-Padilla, M.; Y.P. Papastamatiou; J. O'Sullivan & C.G. Lowe (2013). "Observation of an Attack by a Cookiecutter Shark (Isistius brasiliensis) on a White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias)". Pacific Science. 67 (1): 129–134. doi:10.2984/67.1.10. S2CID 86420663.
  20. ^ a b Martin, R.A. Attacked by a Dogfish. ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Retrieved on January 26, 2010.
  21. ^ a b Heithaus, M.R. (2004). "Predator-Prey Interactions". In Carrier, J.C.; J.A. Musick; M.R. Heithaus (eds.). Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives. CRC Press. pp. 487–521. ISBN 978-0-8493-1514-5.
  22. ^ Gasparini, J.L.; I. Sazima (1996). "A stranded melon-headed whale, Peponocephala electra, in southeastern Brazil, with comments on wounds from the cookiecutter shark, Isistius brasiliensis". Marine Mammal Science. 12 (2): 308–312. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1996.tb00582.x.
  23. ^ a b Gadig, O.B.F.; U.L. Gomes (May 2002). "First report on embryos of Isistius brasiliensis". Journal of Fish Biology. 60 (5): 1322–1325. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01723.x.
  24. ^ Perry, B. (March 21, 2009). "Cookie-cutter sharks 'sort of a mosquito of the sea'". The Maui News. Retrieved on January 26, 2010.
  25. ^ Honebrink, R.; R. Buch; P. Galpin & G.H. Burgess (2011). "First documented attack on a live human by a cookiecutter shark (Squaliformes, Dalatiidae: Isistius sp.)". Pacific Science. 65 (3): 365–374. doi:10.2984/65.3.365. hdl:10125/29734. S2CID 85627382.
  26. ^ "Rare Cookiecutter Shark Bite in Hawaii". March 18, 2019.
  27. ^ "Second cookiecutter shark bite reported in Hawaii". April 17, 2019.
  28. ^ "In rare third incident for year, swimmer attacked by cookiecutter shark". November 20, 2019.
  29. ^ McMurray, Kevin (November 1, 2017). "7-year-old bitten by cookiecutter shark in Australia". Tracking Sharks. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  30. ^ McMurray, Kevin (December 15, 2022). "Man fights off shark attack with diving knife". Tracking Sharks. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  31. ^ McMurray, Kevin (April 24, 2023). "Hawaiian swimmer fast-pitches attacking cookiecutter sharks". Tracking Sharks. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  32. ^ Makino, Y.; K. Tachihara; S. Ageda; T. Arao; C. Fuke & T. Miyazaki (June 2004). "Peculiar Circular and C-Shaped Injuries on a Body from the Sea". The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 25 (2): 169–171. doi:10.1097/01.paf.0000127390.07879.62. PMID 15166773.
  33. ^ Ribéreau-Gayon, Agathe; Rando, Carolyn; Schuliar, Yves; Chapenoire, Stéphane; Crema, Enrico R.; Claes, Julien; Seret, Bernard; Maleret, Vincent; Morgan, Ruth M. (March 1, 2017). "Extensive unusual lesions on a large number of immersed human victims found to be from cookiecutter sharks (Isistius spp.): an examination of the Yemenia plane crash". International Journal of Legal Medicine. 131 (2): 423–432. doi:10.1007/s00414-016-1449-6. ISSN 0937-9827. PMC 5306341. PMID 27623973.
  34. ^ Johnson, C.S. (1978). "Sea Creatures and the Problem of Equipment Damage". U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings. August 1978: 106–107.
  35. ^ a b Maniguet, X. (2007). The Jaws of Death: Sharks as Predator, Man as Prey. Skyhorse Publishing. pp. 102–103. ISBN 978-1-60239-021-8.
  36. ^ Duffy, Clinton A. J.; Francis, Malcolm; Dunn, M. R.; Finucci, Brit; Ford, Richard; Hitchmough, Rod; Rolfe, Jeremy (2018). Conservation status of New Zealand chondrichthyans (chimaeras, sharks and rays), 2016 (PDF). Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation. p. 10. ISBN 9781988514628. OCLC 1042901090.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Cookiecutter shark: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The cookiecutter shark (Isistius brasiliensis), also called the cigar shark, is a species of small squaliform shark in the family Dalatiidae. This shark occurs in warm, oceanic waters worldwide, particularly near islands, and has been recorded as deep as 3.7 km (2.3 mi). It migrates vertically up to 3 km (1.9 mi) every day, approaching the surface at dusk and descending with the dawn. Reaching only 42–56 cm (16.5–22 in) in length, the cookiecutter shark has a long, cylindrical body with a short, blunt snout, large eyes, two tiny spineless dorsal fins, and a large caudal fin. It is dark brown, with light-emitting photophores covering its underside except for a dark "collar" around its throat and gill slits.

The name "cookiecutter shark" refers to its feeding habit of gouging round plugs, as if cut out with a cookie cutter, out of larger animals. Marks made by cookiecutter sharks have been found on a wide variety of marine mammals and fishes, as well as on submarines, undersea cables, and even human bodies. It also consumes whole smaller prey such as squid. Cookiecutter sharks have adaptations for hovering in the water column and likely rely on stealth and subterfuge to capture more active prey. Its dark collar seems to mimic the silhouette of a small fish, while the rest of its body blends into the downwelling light via its ventral photophores. When a would-be predator approaches the lure, the shark attaches itself using its suctorial lips and specialized pharynx and neatly excises a chunk of the flesh using its bandsaw-like set of lower teeth. This species has been known to travel in schools.

Though rarely encountered because of its oceanic habitat, a handful of documented attacks on humans were apparently caused by cookiecutter sharks. Nevertheless, this diminutive shark is not regarded as dangerous to humans. The International Union for Conservation of Nature has listed the cookiecutter shark under least concern, as it is widely distributed, has no commercial value, and is not particularly susceptible to fisheries.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Description

provided by World Register of Marine Species
Feeds on large squids, gonostomatids, crustaceans, and may also bite circular plugs of tissue from large pelagic animals (wahoo, tuna, billfishes, cetaceans etc.) (Ref. 6577).Travels long vertical distances in excess of 2000 to 3000 m on a diel cycle. Presumably ovoviviparous. Tooth replacement: teeth are shed as a complete unit. Interconnection at the bases of individual tooth allows a whole row of teeth to move if one tooth is touched. This shark is reported to radiate light for as long as three hours after its death.

Reference

Froese, R. & D. Pauly (Editors). (2023). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. version (02/2023).

license
cc-by-4.0
copyright
WoRMS Editorial Board
contributor
Edward Vanden Berghe [email]

Habitat

provided by World Register of Marine Species
Known from seamounts and knolls

Reference

Stocks, K. 2009. Seamounts Online: an online information system for seamount biology. Version 2009-1. World Wide Web electronic publication.

license
cc-by-4.0
copyright
WoRMS Editorial Board
contributor
[email]