The seed oil is used in industry.
Botanical description: This description covers characteristics that may be relevant to fire ecology and is not meant for identification. Keys for identification are available (e.g., [58,60,80,226]).
Aboveground description: Leafy spurge is an erect, perennial forb that grows 8 to 35 inches (20-90 cm) tall [77,80,90]. Because of prolific vegetative growth, leafy spurge often grows in rather thick clumps [12]. Although herbaceous, stems have a woody texture and when mature, are nearly shrubby [5]. Damaged stems ooze a milky fluid [128]. Stems are simple, but near the inflorescences, they have umbrella-like branching and dense leaves [60,98,130]. Linear stem leaves are 2 to 6 inches (5-15 cm) long and about 4 to 8 times as long as they are wide [43,77,90,151]. At the stem bases, leaves are reduced [226]. Leaves associated with the inflorescences are heart-shaped [98,222]. Inflorescences are comprised of a single pistillate and 12 to 25 staminate flowers. Flowers are greatly reduced and lack both sepals and petals [60,80,234]. Leafy spurge generally produces a very small, 3-chambered capsule that produces 2 to 2.5 mm seeds [77,234]. Four- and five-chambered capsules have been observed, although rarely [199,200]. When mature, capsules "explode" to eject seeds [12]. For more about this, see the Seed dispersal section below.
Look-alikes and hybrids: Leafy spurge is similar in appearance to cypress spurge. In general, leafy spurge is larger and produces fewer and larger leaves than cypress spurge. Euphorbia × pseudoesula plant height, leaf size, and leaf abundance are generally intermediate to what is characteristic of the parents, although hybrids more closely resemble leafy spurge than cypress spurge. For more on identifying and distinguishing cypress spurge, leafy spurge, and Euphorbia × pseudoesula see these references: [14,146,147,191,213,222].
Belowground description:
Leafy spurge produces a persistent, prolific, and often deep and massive root system [43,48]. Although typically described as persistent, the life span of leafy spurge's perennial root system was not reported in the literature available as of 2010.
Substantial vegetative growth and clonal spread occur through root sprouting in leafy spurge [151]. Although some refer to the sprouting roots as rhizomes [60,117,234], after years of studying the anatomy and morphology of leafy spurge in the laboratory, Raju [175] reported that "morphologically specialized structures such as runners or rhizomes (we)re not observed". In an earlier publication, Raju and others [176] acknowledged that "the phenomenon of shoot-bud production by roots (wa)s interesting...as a fundamental problem in morphogenesis".
Several excavation studies show that the leafy spurge root system is dense and deep. The root systems of mature leafy spurge plants excavated from clay soils near Fargo, North Dakota, had numerous coarse and fine roots that occupied a large volume of soil. Coarse roots were woody, tough, and produced numerous buds. Researchers described "extreme development" of fine, white roots in the upper 2 feet (0.6 m) of soil. Roots within the top 1 foot (0.3 m) of soil were as much as 0.5 inch (1.3 cm) in diameter. Large horizontal roots occurred as deep as 20 inches (50 cm) and produced shoots 1 to 3.5 feet (0.3- 1.1 m) away from the parent plant. Vertical roots reached the water table, which was 8 feet (2.4 m) below the soil surface. In dense leafy spurge stands, "the mass of roots in the soil (wa)s enormous" [72]. Plants excavated from constantly moist soils in a field in Iowa had 8 vertical roots that reached over 12 feet (3.7 m) deep. The deepest root was 15 feet 8 inches (4.8 m). Based on root aging estimates, the excavated plant was 10 years old [5]. Leafy spurge roots extended more than 10 feet (3 m) deep in sandy loam soils near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Fragments from roots collected at 9 feet deep (2.7 m) produced shoots when planted [176]. For a description of seedling roots, see Seedling establishment.
Soil texture and fertility can affect growth and distribution of leafy spurge roots. In Saskatchewan, soil texture affected root distribution, and past land use affected total root weight of leafy spurge. In fine soils, leafy spurge roots were thick in the top 6 inches (15 cm) of soil. In coarse soils, roots were thick at soil depths below 30 inches (76 cm). Root weight in undisturbed native grasslands was about twice that of recently cultivated areas [199]. In a greenhouse experiment, leafy spurge roots grew downward about twice as fast in sandy soil as in clay soil. Roots in clay soil had greater branching than those in sandy soil [72]. Controlled outdoor experiments showed that high levels of soil nitrogen can reduce the biomass of leafy spurge roots and lead to greater root concentrations near the top of the soil profile [188].
Leafy spurge is native to Eurasia but occurs as a nonnative species nearly throughout western North America and the central two-thirds of eastern North America [58,221]. At the edges of this range, leafy spurge is less common. In western Canada, leafy spurge is known as far north as Yukon. Leafy spurge is rare along the Pacific Northwest Coast [166] and is generally restricted to the northern regions of California, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico [20,77,90,130,165]. In the Great Plains, leafy spurge is much more common in the northern 75% than the southern 25% [60], and it is rare along the Atlantic Coast [48].
Leafy spurge is most widespread and invasive in the US states of Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota, and Wisconsin [16,117]. By 1975, leafy spurge populations were largest and most extensive in the Great Plains region and occurred in 80 counties in Minnesota, 54 in Montana, 54 in Nebraska, 52 in North Dakota, and 49 in South Dakota [49]. As of 1979, leafy spurge occupied 2.5 million acres (1 million ha) in North America, including 800,000 acres (320,000 ha) in Minnesota, 600,000 acres (240,000 ha) in North Dakota, and 543,000 acres (220,000 ha) in Montana [153]. By 2000, 1.2 million acres (490,000 ha) of rangelands in North Dakota were infested by leafy spurge (Lym and others 2000 cited in [45]). As of 2005, leafy spurge occupied an estimated 4.6 million acres (1.9 million ha) in the United States, of which about half or more was rangeland in the northern Great Plains [45,117].
The Russian leafy spurge variety that is recognized by some [89,221] is found in scattered locations from Saskatchewan to Colorado and Kansas and from Michigan to Pennsylvania and Connecticut. However, only the typical variety is reported in the Northeast by Magee and Ahles [128]. Leafy spurge and Russian leafy spurge distributions are available from the Plants Database website.
Introduction to North America: There were likely many separate introductions of leafy spurge to North America [51,200]. In a review, Dunn [50] suggests at least 4 possible early introductions of leafy spurge in North America. The first US leafy spurge collection was made in 1827 from Newbury, Massachusetts, where leafy spurge was thought to originate from a ballast dump. The first Canadian leafy spurge collection was made in 1899 from Huron County, Ontario; the species was likely brought by Russian immigrants in contaminated spelt from Germany [18,50]. Early spread of leafy spurge in North America was attributed to the planting and cultivation of contaminated smooth brome (Bromus inermis) and cereal seed from within and outside North America [5,50,200]. Royer and Dickinson [191] suggest that leafy spurge in Massachusetts came from the Caucasus region of western Asia, and leafy spurge found in Minnesota in 1890 came from Russia. When researchers compared the DNA from leafy spurge plants collected from Nebraska, Montana, Russia, Italy, and Austria, they found the DNA in plants from Nebraska, Montana, and Russia to be most similar [152]. In another DNA study, researchers found a high degree of genetic variability among 123 leafy spurge plants collected from Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska, which suggested multiple North American introductions or a high degree of variability for leafy spurge in its native range [190].
Perhaps because of multiple introductions and the cultivation of contaminated crops, leafy spurge was widespread in the northern United States and southern Canada by the early 1900s. Leafy spurge occurred in Ontario by 1889 [191] and in Iowa by 1899 [5]. As of 1900, it was described as "naturalized" in parts of the northeastern United States [155]. Leafy spurge was also reported in Oregon and Washington by 1900 and in Idaho in the early 1900s [33]. Although leafy spurge was found in 2 Michigan counties before 1900, the majority of collections occurred after 1930 [226]. Leafy spurge was quite common throughout New York by 1924 [150], and occurred in Nova Scotia by 1928 [189] and in British Columbia by 1939 [191]. In Arizona, however, leafy spurge was first collected from Coconino County in 1970 [165].
Local distribution changes: Several studies report dense populations as well as rapid spread of leafy spurge in North America. Populations with densities of 1,000 stems/yard² are not uncommon [20]. By 1962 in Canada, 35,000 to 40,000 acres (14,000-16,000 ha) were occupied by leafy spurge. In a Saskatchewan municipality, the acreage infested with leafy spurge more than doubled in 3 years despite control efforts [199]. In North Dakota, the number of acres with leafy spurge doubled in the 9-year period from 1973 to 1982 [16]. The annual spread rate for leafy spurge from 1909 to 2002 in North Dakota was about 16% [117]. In Montana's Lolo National Forest, the estimated 10-year spread rate was reported as 100% in an Environmental Impact Statement draft published in 1989 [219]. A 2005 Weed Science Society of America publication reported that the "historic" annual spread rate of leafy spurge in the United States ranged from 12% to 16%. The time frame used to estimate this rate was not reported [47].
Potential for postfire establishment and spread: Although some leafy spurge seed mortality is likely on burned sites, there is high potential for postfire establishment from on- and off-site seed sources and vegetative spread into open sites. Leafy spurge produces abundant seed in most years, adds a small portion of seed to the soil seed bank, and disperses seed by ejection from the capsule, water transport, and animal movements. Open sites and soil disturbances are associated with increased leafy spurge seedling establishment, growth, and survival (see the discussion on Disturbances and seedling establishment).
Preventing postfire establishment and spread: Preventing invasive plants from establishing in weed-free burned areas is the most effective and least costly management method. This may be accomplished through early detection and eradication, careful monitoring and follow-up, and limiting dispersal of leafy spurge propagules into burned areas. General recommendations for preventing postfire establishment and spread of invasive plants include:
For more detailed information on these topics, see the following publications: [4,24,59,220].
Use of prescribed fire as a control agent: Prescribed fire alone is not used to control leafy spurge, but fire in conjunction with herbicides has provided some control, and fire may improve the effectiveness of flea beetle biocontrols.
Fire and herbicides: Eliminating woody or dead stems and ground litter with prescribed fire can be useful in increasing the visibility of small leafy spurge plants and seedlings and improving herbicide coverage [125]. In a tallgrass prairie restoration handbook, Solecki [205] suggests that leafy spurge can be controlled with repeated fall herbicide treatments followed by spring burning. Two to 3 herbicide and burning treatments were necessary for control, but the duration of control was not reported. Smith (personal communication 1987 cited in [16]) reported "excellent" control of leafy spurge after 5 to 6 years of biennial burning and herbicide treatments. Fire timing was not critical to control, but herbicide treatments needed to occur 3 to 4 weeks after burning.
Fire did not improve herbicide control of leafy spurge in 2 studies in North Dakota. In a mixed-grass prairie site at Gilbert C Grafton South Military Reservation, leafy spurge density was not significantly different on plots treated with herbicide only and plots treated with herbicide and burning (P>0.05) [170]. When unburned, burned, and combination (herbicide treated, then burned) treatments were compared in the Little Missouri National Grassland, leafy spurge density was lowest on combination plots, but combination treatments did not reduce stem density significantly more than herbicide treatments alone. However, leafy spurge germination was lower in soils collected from burned-only and combination plots than in soils collected from unburned or herbicide-only plots. Germination was lower on spring-burned than on fall-burned plots, regardless of herbicide treatments [240]. Leafy spurge abundance was still low and native grasses and forbs were reestablishing on plots 2 years after combination treatments (Bjugstad 1987 personal communication cited in [16]).
Fire and flea beetles (Aphthona spp.): Researchers found that fall or spring burning prior to the release of A. nigriscutis improved its colonization of leafy spurge-infested grasslands in south-central and southeastern North Dakota. Fires occurred in mid-October or early May, and beetles were released in late June of the following growing season. Within a year of the release, there were significantly more flea beetles on burned than unburned plots (P<0.01). Flea beetle colonization success was positively associated with percentage of bare ground and negatively associated with increasing litter depths. In this study, most beetle populations failed to persist past the first generation [53]. In another study, burning before releasing a large number of flea beetles showed immediate leafy spurge control benefits. Within a year of beetle release in plots burned in June, the average leafy spurge-free radius extended 37 inches (93 cm) from the release sites in burned plots and 14 inches (36 cm) in unburned plots. In burned plots, there was a zone of reduced stem density 10 to 13 feet (3-4 m) beyond the major defoliation area. Unburned plots lacked this additional reduction zone (Fellows unpublished data cited in [53]).
Some researchers report that fires from mid-May to mid-August could interfere with the life cycle of adult flea beetles in leafy spurge-infested areas [142]. However, the study conducted in North Dakota indicates that appropriately timed prescribed burning programs can occur without disrupting established flea beetle populations. When grassland sites with established A. nigriscutis populations were burned in the spring (mid-May) or fall (mid-October), there were no significant differences in flea beetle numbers within a year of burning. Researchers suggested that spring fires should occur early enough to allow for leafy spurge regrowth prior to beetle emergence. In southeastern North Dakota, emergence occurred around 25 May in most years but could be as early as 15 May in a dry year. Because the flea beetles have typically laid their eggs by early September, fall fires after this time should not harm flea beetle populations [53].
Altered fuel characteristics: The effects of dense leafy spurge stands on fire frequency or fire severity were not described in any detail in the reviewed literature (as of 2010). For a short discussion on this topic, see the Fuels and FIRE REGIMES sections.
Fuels: According to Bjugstad (personal communication 1987, cited in [16]), the high oil content of leafy spurge foliage allows for "good" fire spread, and an herbicide treatment prior to burning may improve flammability and/or fire spread. Senescing plants may support better fire spread than green plants.
FIRE REGIMES: The effects of dense leafy spurge stands on fire frequency or fire severity were not described in any detail in the reviewed literature (as of 2010). Some have speculated that leafy spurge infestations can alter fire frequency [28], but the ways in which fire frequency was changed were not reported, and the studies or observations that support this assertion were not described. Some suggest that leafy spurge expanded its range rapidly with fire exclusion from grasslands in the northern Great Plains [23]. However, because leafy spurge introductions were occurring at about the same time as fire exclusion began (see discussion on North American introductions), the cause and effect relationships suggested by Brockway and others [23] may be purely coincidental. See the Fire Regime Table for additional information on the FIRE REGIMES in those habitat types or vegetation communities where leafy spurge may be abundant. Find further fire regime information for the plant communities in which this species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under "Find FIRE REGIMES".
Seed dormancy mechanisms or controls are contained within the leafy spurge seed coat and are typically overcome by warm, moist conditions [55]. In the field, most leafy spurge seed germinates after several days at temperatures of 79 to 82 °F (26-28 °C) [199]. Average germination of seed collected from 4 locations in Saskatchewan ranged from 4% to 38% in the laboratory. Germination of seeds from the same site was similar in different years, suggesting a genetic difference in dormancy between sites [199]. In controlled studies, 48-hour freezing/thawing cycles slightly increased leafy spurge germination, and 48-hour wetting/drying cycles slightly decreased germination. Prolonged darkness promoted germination but scarification did not [198,200].
Timing: During field studies conducted near the University of Saskatchewan, maximum germination of leafy spurge seed occurred when seeds were 1 year old. Nearly all seeds germinated in May and June, although some germination continued through September [198,200]. When freshly ripe leafy spurge seeds were sown outdoors in the summer in North Dakota, 50% germinated the following spring [72], suggesting that summer temperatures may have been too hot for germination of a proportion of the seed.
Seed burial: In the laboratory, leafy spurge germination at 70 to 100 °F (20-40 °C) was often greater in dark than light conditions [199], suggesting that buried seeds may germinate better than seeds on the soil surface. In field studies, leafy spurge seedlings emerged from seeds just below soil surface and up to 2 inches (6 cm) deep. Germination was greatest at the 0.5-inch (1.2 cm) and 2-inch (5 cm) depths [176,198,200]. The greatest depth tested was 6 inches (15 cm) [198,200].
Temperature: Germination of leafy spurge seed is best at alternating, yet moderate temperatures. In laboratory studies, maximum leafy spurge germination occurred at alternating temperatures where the low was 68 °F (20 °C) and the high was 86 to 95 °F (30-35 °C) [26,198,200]. In other controlled studies, leafy spurge failed to germinate at temperatures at or below 37 °F (3 °C), but germination increased with increasing temperatures. At 82 to 88 °F (28-31 °C), germination was 43% on moist paper and 24% in moist soil [5].
Moisture: After 14 days in water, 13% of leafy spurge seeds germinated. Seeds on moist paper germinated better than those in water [198,199,200].
Soil texture: Leafy spurge seeds typically germinate better in clay than in coarser textured soils [198,200]. When the germination of leafy spurge seeds from several sites was compared in soils from the collection site and in uniform silty clay loams, germination was better in soils from the collection area (P<0.01), suggesting some degree of site adaptation. When seeds from a single source were tested, percent germination was greater in clays than in coarser soils [199]. In North Dakota's Little Missouri National Grasslands, leafy spurge emergence averaged 4.9% from soils collected from the floodplain and 3.8% from soils collected from upland sites [240].
Leafy spurge occurs on a variety of sites that include roadsides, old fields, pastures, meadows, riparian areas, and open woodlands [43,60,77,90,213]. In Saskatchewan leafy spurge occurs "in almost every conceivable habitat, with the exception of boreal forest" (reviews by [199,200]). Sand dunes, glacial moraines, eroded slopes, and saline depressions are all potential leafy spurge habitat [199].
Climate: Although leafy spurge is most common and problematic in semi-arid continental climates, it also occurs in xeric to subhumid and subtropical and subarctic climates [20,199]. In Saskatchewan, leafy spurge occurred in areas where high temperatures exceeded 100 °F (38 °C) and low temperatures dipped below -50 °F (-46 °C), annual precipitation ranged from 7 to 25 inches (180-630 mm), and the number of frost-free days averaged 106 [199]. During controlled experiments, survival of leafy spurge root crown buds was reduced by 50% at 10 °F (-12 °C) in one year and -4 °F (-20 °C) in another year [194].
Greenhouse experiments suggested that "competition" between leafy spurge, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), and western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) could be less "intense" in years with frequent and substantial precipitation. Researchers indicated that the greenhouse findings may not be realized in the field, because only even-aged juvenile plants were tested and there were few height differences between leafy spurge and the grasses [186].
Elevation ranges reported for leafy spurge in parts of the western United States
State Elevation (feet) California <4,600 [77] Colorado 5,000-6,500 [74] Nevada 4,900-7000 [90] Northern New Mexico 5,000-6,000 [130] Utah 4,600-9,500 [234]Soils: Leafy spurge occurs in a variety of soils ranging from rich, damp riparian soils to dry, nutrient-poor rangeland soils [16]. However, field surveys in Saskatchewan indicate that leafy spurge is most common on coarse-textured soils, and the size of leafy spurge infestations increases as soil textures change from clays to sands [199]. While plants may be more common, grow more rapidly, produce deeper roots, and be more difficult to control on coarse-textured soils [199], seedling emergence and survival are generally best in fine-textured soil (see Soil effects on seedling establishment section). Greenhouse studies showed that leafy spurge root biomass may be lower and may be concentrated in the upper soil profile when soil nitrogen levels are high [188]. Leafy spurge tolerates some flooding. Plants survived in 3 of 4 pots that were flooded for 4.5 months. At a field site in Saskatchewan, leafy spurge failed to survive 5 years of continuous flooding [200].
Impacts: Leafy spurge is considered a "serious", "very aggressive", "most troublesome", and "highly invasive" nonnative species in the northern half of the United States [60,90,98,218], which has established and spread in stable, undisturbed native plant communities [43,131]. In Minnesota's Pipestone National Monument, leafy spurge is the highest control priority because delayed control results in the great costs [180]. In Massachusetts, leafy spurge has spread into native or minimally managed plant communities [131]. At the coastal and southern fringes of its US distribution (see General Distribution), leafy spurge is less aggressive and less problematic for land managers. In Virginia, leafy spurge is "occasionally invasive", typically establishes only in "severely" disturbed areas, and spreads slowly or not at all from disturbed sites [225].
Leafy spurge's high reproductive rates, potential for rapid dispersal, and already large, established populations in natural areas make it a severe threat to native plant communities (Hiebert and Stubbendieck 1993 cited in [180]). As of 2000, leafy spurge was among the 10 most frequently listed noxious weeds in the contiguous United States and Canada's southern provinces [204]. As of 2005, leafy spurge ranked 6th in a list of 81 nonnative, invasive species seriously impacting natural habitats of Canada [34]. In a survey of Wisconsin's authorities on local flora, leafy spurge ranked 12th out of 66 nonnative invasive plants evaluated for their impacts on native plant communities [183].
Observations, surveys, and studies indicate that leafy spurge establishment, spread, and persistence can negatively impact human health, native and rare plant species abundance, ranching and farming economies, wildlife abundance and land use patterns, and competition for pollinators. One study suggests that leafy spurge's US distribution may contract with future climate changes, but another study suggests that leafy spurge may become more invasive as CO2 levels reach future predicted levels.
Impacts to human health: A review reports that leafy spurge contains toxins, likely within its milky sap, that can cause internal and external irritations. Swelling and burning of the mouth and throat and abdominal pain have been reported after ingestion of leafy spurge. Blisters and skin inflammation can occur after handling leafy spurge [117]. Severe dermatitis has been reported for some people [14]. After researchers identified tumor-promoting properties in leafy spurge, some have suggested a dietary cancer risk in eating livestock that graze leafy spurge (review by [117]). In the reviewed literature, no other studies evaluated this risk.
Impacts on associated vegetation: Rapid vegetative spread (see Rates of vegetative spread), dense stand production, and thick litter accumulations allow leafy spurge to replace rare and/or native plant species. In leafy spurge stands, densities of 1,000 stems/yd² are common. Researchers suggest that stands of that density could easily crowd out associated native vegetation [20]. The thick litter layer produced in dense leafy spurge stands can inhibit establishment of light-demanding species [231]. Other studies suggest that leafy spurge allelopathy or effects on soils and soil biota may also limit associated vegetation.
Studies indicate that leafy spurge threatens sensitive species, replaces native species, and negatively impacts species richness. In tallgrass prairie swales in North Dakota's Sheyenne National Grassland, leafy spurge often dominates and is "continuing to expand" in habitats that support the federally threatened Great Plains white fringed orchid (Platanthera praeclara). Future spread and efforts to control leafy spurge are considered serious threats to the orchid [202,203]. When the composition of remnant mixed-grass prairie and leafy spurge-dominated sites were compared in Manitoba, Canada, cover of common native species and total species richness were significantly greater (P<0.05) in prairie than leafy spurge-dominated vegetation. Areas beyond leafy spurge patches supported 7 to 11 native species, whereas areas where leafy spurge was abundant supported only 4 native species [13]. In 7 of 11 leafy spurge-infested plant associations in North Dakota's Theodore Roosevelt National Park, species richness was 51% lower in infested than uninfested areas. Species richness losses were greatest in silver sagebrush, creeping juniper, and prairie sandreed associations (P<0.05). While 77% to 93% of the species occurring in infested stands also occurred in uninfested stands, just 50% to 79% of the species in uninfested stands also occurred in infested stands. Across all communities, 93 species were restricted to uninfested stands. Of these, 53% were forbs, 25% were graminoids, and 21% were shrubs or subshrubs [28].
Allelopathy: Allelopathic effects could play a part in leafy spurge's impact on neighboring vegetation, but field studies documenting allelopathic influence are lacking. In Fort Collins, Colorado, high densities and frequencies of quackgrass (Elymus repens) and annual ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) occurred near the perimeter but were absent near the center of a leafy spurge patch. A follow-up greenhouse study found that growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and hairy crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) were greater in soils without leafy spurge litter than in soils with leafy spurge litter. Researchers suggested that dead or decaying leafy spurge plant material may have allelopathic properties [208]. In other laboratory studies, germination of common wheat (Triticum vulgare), crested wheatgrass, smooth brome, and wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis subsp. arvensis) watered with extracts of leafy spurge leaves or stems was significantly lower than that of controls (P<0.05) [200]. Growth of mouseear cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedlings treated with leafy spurge root exudate was lower than control seedlings. Researchers identified leafy spurge root compounds capable of causing necrosis or limiting root growth [173]. However, not all studies found evidence of allelopathy. A controlled study by Olson and Wallander [161] found little to no effect of leafy spurge litter leachate or leafy spurge-infested soils on germination, seedling growth, or seedling survival of bluebunch wheatgrass or western wheatgrass.
Soils and soil biota: Impacts of leafy spurge on associated vegetation may be related to changes in soils or soil biota from leafy spurge dominance or leafy spurge control and management. In Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, researchers conducted pairwise comparisons between mountain meadows dominated by leafy spurge and meadows with low leafy spurge abundance. Leafy spurge-dominated areas had been mechanically and chemically treated. There were significantly more native plants on uninfested than infested plots (P=0.043). There were more nonnative species on infested than uninfested plots, although differences were not significant. The number of soil microarthropods was significantly greater on uninfested than infested plots (P<0.05) [168].
In a greenhouse study, plant growth was compared in soils taken from containers where either leafy spurge, smooth brome, or native species were grown. Growth of white heath aster (Symphyotrichum ericoides var. ericoides), Lewis flax (Linum lewisii), upright prairie coneflower (Ratibida columnifera), and prairie Junegrass (Koeleria pyramidata) seedlings was lower in soils from pots with leafy spurge than in soils from pots with native species. Blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis) and green needlegrass (Nassella viridula) seedling growth was similar in soils from pots with leafy spurge and soils from pots with native species. Leafy spurge seedling growth was lower in soils from pots with native species than in soils from pots with smooth brome [86].
Economic impacts: Many studies have attempted to estimate the economic impacts of leafy spurge invasion. While most studies evaluated land value changes associated with reductions in cattle carrying capacities, others included reductions related to wildlife-associated recreation, soil and water conservation, as well as other social and environmental impacts. In North Dakota, researchers assessed the economic impacts of leafy spurge on wildlands. At the leafy spurge infestation levels present in the early 1990s, the direct economic impacts on wildlife-associated recreation, soil and water conservation, and other intangible benefits amounted to 3.6 million dollars. When evaluated with other direct and secondary economic impacts on wildlands and rangelands, costs were estimated at over 87 million dollars [230].
Value of ranch land in North Dakota that was heavily infested with leafy spurge was reduced by 60 to 85 dollars/acre based on reductions in livestock carrying capacity (Weiser 1995 cited in [158]). In the mid 1980s, the sale price of a large ranch in Klamath County, Oregon, was reduced by 83% because of leafy spurge infestations (Begley 1998 cited in [45], Weiser 1995 cited in [158]). Although the sale stipulated that the new owner must control the leafy spurge, 6 years and 60,000 dollars later there was little control (Weiser 1995 cited in [158]). Rinella and Luschei [184] developed models to estimate the economic impacts of leafy spurge at local and regional scales. For a 17-state area west of Minnesota and Texas, the model estimated that leafy spurge reduced the cattle carrying capacity by 50,000 to 217,000 cows/year and decreased the value of grazing lands by 8 to 34 million dollars/year [184].
Additional information is available on the economic impacts of leafy spurge in North Dakota [108,109] and the upper Great Plains [110]; on the economic impacts of leafy spurge on wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming [7]; on the social and economic impacts of leafy spurge in Montana [182]; on the social and economic impacts of leafy spurge on public lands in North Dakota and Montana [126]; and on the regional environmental, economic, and societal impacts of invasive species, including leafy spurge [47].
Impacts on wildlife: Leafy spurge was associated with reduced habitat utilization by ungulates in North Dakota, as well as low abundance and/or nesting success for several bird species in North Dakota and Manitoba. For 2 years in North Dakota's Theodore Roosevelt National Park, researchers compared ungulate use of leafy spurge-infested and uninfested habitats. Bison and deer (white-tailed deer and mule deer) pellet group densities were significantly (P<0.001) lower on infested than uninfested sites. Elk pellet group densities averaged 81% lower on infested than uninfested sites (P<0.1) [214]. In North Dakota's Sheyenne National Grassland, researchers surveyed grassland breeding bird densities and nesting success on plots with low (<20%), medium (20-60%), and high (>60%) cover of leafy spurge. Grasshopper sparrow and savannah sparrow densities were significantly lower on plots with high cover than those with medium or low cover (P<0.05). Densities of bobolinks and western meadowlarks were not significantly different on plots with low, medium, or high cover. Low-cover plots averaged 63 nests and 24 species; medium-cover plots averaged 57 nests and 26 species; and high-cover plots averaged 37 nests and 15 species [193]. In Manitoba, upland sandpipers and Sprague's pipits were significantly more abundant in native- than nonnative-dominated vegetation (P<0.05), but the opposite was true for grasshopper sparrows (P=0.059). Native prairie was dominated by blue grama, obtuse sedge (Carex obtusata), and porcupine grass (Hesperostipa spartea). Nonnative vegetation was dominated by smooth brome, Kentucky bluegrass, and leafy spurge. Cover of leafy spurge ranged from 17% to 81% [239].
Pollinators: Study findings are mixed regarding leafy spurge's effects on competition for pollinators. When insect visitation and pollen deposition were evaluated in leafy spurge-infested and uninfested prairies in Theodore Roosevelt National Park, competition for pollinators was not widespread and varied annually. In some years, native halictid bees visited infested prairies less frequently than uninfested prairies. Researchers suggested that pollination of rare species could be limited by the combined reductions in native flower density and conspecific pollen transfer [107]. Observations together with greenhouse and field experiments indicate that although leafy spurge and prairie violet (Viola pedatifida) share pollinators, evidence of pollination competition between the species was lacking. Prairie violet seed set was reduced when leafy spurge pollen was applied to flowers before successful pollination by conspecific pollen. Prairie violet received significantly more leafy spurge pollen on sites with than without leafy spurge (P<0.05). However, prairie violet fruit set was significantly higher on sites with than without leafy spurge (P=0.004) [144].
Climate change: Predicted future changes in climate may differentially affect leafy spurge's future distribution and invasiveness. Increases in CO2 levels may increase the invasibility of sites or the competitiveness of leafy spurge. A greenhouse experiment demonstrated that leafy spurge leaf and stem weights increased significantly at past, present, and predicted future CO2 levels [243]. However, responses of associated native species were not investigated. Using bioclimatic modeling, researchers predict that the risk of invasion by leafy spurge could decrease in Colorado, Nebraska, Minnesota, and parts of Idaho and Oregon, but could increase in Canada [22].
Control: In their review, Hansen and others [70] report that leafy spurge is "extremely difficult to control with herbicides" and "almost impossible to control by cultural or physical methods". Many sources indicate that prioritizing control is important to successful management. Weed control handbooks and management guides report that early detection of new and small leafy spurge populations should be a top control priority, because well established populations are rarely controlled by any contemporary methods [20,45].
Land managers and researchers suggest that small leafy spurge patches should be treated before focusing on large populations, and that broadcast treatments for large infestations are largely unsuccessful. Lym and Zollinger [125] suggest mapping leafy spurge populations, protecting uninfested areas, treating small infestations first, and treating large populations from the outside edges inward. Researchers found that small leafy spurge patches in Saskatchewan increased in size at a much greater rate than large patches. In 5 years, a 7-ft² (0.6 m²) patch increased in area by 387 times, while a 701-ft² (65 m²) patch increased by 30 times. Assuming a lateral spread rate of 2 feet (0.6 m)/year for 5 years, a 0.5-foot (0.2 m) diameter patch would increase almost 500 times as fast as a 25-foot (7.6 m) diameter patch [199]. Using spatial growth models, researchers found that control could be improved by focusing on the elimination of satellite populations before treating large infestations. Control was "greatly improved" by eliminating just 30% of satellite populations [145].
Persistence, monitoring, and evaluating and adjusting methods are essential to long-term management of leafy spurge [99]. Leafy spurge sprouts emerge from surviving root portions even after elimination of all aboveground tissue. Monitoring and follow-up treatments may be necessary for up to 10 years after aboveground removal [16]. Control of biotic invasions is most effective when it employs a long-term, ecosystem-wide strategy rather than a tactical approach focused on battling individual invaders [127]. Various control methods and procedures are discussed by Lajenuesse and others [99], and Maxwell and others [137] developed a leafy spurge population model that assesses management strategies and allows managers to target leafy spurge's most vulnerable life stages.
In all cases where invasive species are targeted for control, no matter what method is employed, the potential for other invasive species to fill their void must be considered [25]. In biocontrol release areas in east-central and southeastern North Dakota, leafy spurge densities were reduced by 51% to 98%, but there was "little evidence" that leafy spurge was being replaced by desirable native species [106]. In Montana's Carter County, researchers found that nonnative species, primarily bluegrass (Poa spp.), replaced leafy spurge after its control by flea beetles. Although the flea beetles reduced leafy spurge cover and increased total vegetation abundance, there was little change in plant species composition or relative cover. Increases in total vegetation cover were primarily attributed to increases in nonnative species [30]. On the Altamont Prairie Preserve in eastern South Dakota, leafy spurge plots were grazed at high intensity for 4 years by goats or sheep. Flea beetles were released in the grazed area and within 5 years of their introduction, leafy spurge cover was reduced significantly (P<0.001). However, there were no dramatic increases in species richness associated with reductions in leafy spurge [38].
Prevention: It is commonly argued that the most cost-efficient and effective method of managing invasive species is to prevent their establishment and spread by maintaining "healthy" natural communities [127,201] (e.g., avoid road building in wildlands [216]) and by monitoring several times each year [84]. Managing to maintain the integrity of the native plant community and mitigating the factors enhancing ecosystem invasibility are likely to be more effective than managing solely to control the invader [81].
Weed prevention and control can be incorporated into many types of management plans, including those for logging and site preparation, grazing allotments, recreation management, research projects, road building and maintenance, and fire management [220]. Cleaning the seeds and root pieces from equipment before moving it into an uninfested area is important to preventing the establishment of new leafy spurge populations [45]. See the Guide to noxious weed prevention practices [220] for specific guidelines in preventing the spread of weed seeds and propagules under different management conditions.
Fire: For information on the use of prescribed fire to control this species, see Fire Management Considerations.
Cultural control: In a review, Hansen and others [70] reported that leafy spurge is "almost impossible to control by cultural or physical methods". While cultural control methods alone are unlikely to control leafy spurge, some management success has been reported with the combined use of cultural and chemical methods (see Integrated management).
Physical or mechanical control: Repeated cutting or mowing can limit leafy spurge seed production but may not reduce leafy spurge or restrict vegetative spread [16,45]. The milky sap in leafy spurge stems can build up in equipment, making it less effective and more difficult to operate [12].
Biological control: Domestic sheep and goats as well as a variety of insects have been used to control leafy spurge. While continued grazing by domestic sheep and goats is often successful in reducing leafy spurge stem abundance, roots survive and plants may still spread vegetatively [45,138,231]. Leafy spurge typically recovers when grazing pressure is removed [138,231]. Of the many Eurasian insects introduced to the United States and Canada to control leafy spurge, flea beetles have been most successful in providing long-term control thus far (2010). The use of pathogens or fungi in the biological control of leafy spurge has been studied, but as of 2010, none has been released [73,125,242].
Domestic sheep and goats: Control of aboveground growth and seed production are commonly reported in leafy spurge grazing management studies. After 4 years of continuous grazing by domestic sheep in Saskatchewan, leafy spurge shoot density was lower on grazed than ungrazed plots. After 8 years of grazing, the density of leafy spurge shoots was 5 to 10 shoots/m², and the seed bank density was 15 seeds/m². Within 2 years of removing grazing pressure, leafy spurge density was recovering [21]. After 4 or 5 years of domestic sheep grazing near Pearce, Alberta, basal area of leafy spurge decreased significantly, and basal area of crested wheatgrass increased significantly (P<0.05). Sheep avoided mature leafy spurge plants, and some poisoning occurred (for details, see the Livestock section above) [85]. After 2 years of domestic sheep grazing in Gallatin County, Montana, leafy spurge seedling density was reduced significantly (P<0.0001), and the number of viable leafy spurge seeds was reduced by 65%, which was a significantly larger decrease than that on ungrazed sites (P<0.009). Density of mature leafy spurge was not affected in 2 years of grazing, but density of Idaho fescue increased significantly (P<0.0002). However, grazing decreased the density of bluebunch wheatgrass (P<0.08) and increased the frequency of annual brome grasses (P<0.02) [159]. It is important to note that domestic sheep and goats can pass and disperse viable leafy spurge seed. These grazing animals should be kept from uninfested areas until leafy spurge seeds have passed, which was determined to be 5 days for goats and 9 days for sheep in a controlled feeding study [97]. Studies indicate that sometimes utilization differences exist between sheep with and without prior experience grazing leafy spurge [157,228].
Studies reported conflicting findings about prior exposure and learned behavior as it relates to leafy spurge control by domestic sheep. In Montana's Gallatin County, differences in leafy spurge grazing by naive and experienced yearlings was short-lived. In early summer, experienced yearlings grazed leafy spurge 4 times as much as naive yearlings, but by the 25th day of grazing, the 2 yearling groups grazed leafy spurge similarly [157]. In another study, experience increased leafy spurge utilization by sheep. Leafy spurge at a late phenological stage was grazed better by experienced than inexperienced sheep [228].
During confined feeding and field grazing studies on the upper Snake River Plains in southeast Idaho, domestic goats preferred leafy spurge more than sheep did. Goats concentrated on leafy spurge and avoided grasses (P<0.03), while the opposite was true for sheep. Within 8 weeks of grazing trials, leafy spurge was taller (P=0.07) and produced more flowers (P=0.04) in sheep-grazed than goat-grazed pastures [229]. In mesic to wet tallgrass prairie on South Dakota's Altamont Prairie Preserve, goat grazing resulted in greater leafy spurge control than sheep grazing. In 4 years of high-intensity grazing, leafy spurge cover increased by almost 30% in sheep-grazed pasture, was nearly unchanged in goat-grazed pasture, and nearly doubled in ungrazed pasture (P<0.001) [38].
Because domestic goats prefer forbs over grasses, leafy spurge often decreased and graminoids often increased with goat grazing. However, desirable forbs and shrubs can be reduced by domestic goats. After 3 or 4 years of grazing by angora goats in prairie and open woodland sites in Eddy County, North Dakota, leafy spurge frequency decreased and graminoid frequency increased significantly (P<0.05). Goat stocking was increased each year, and leafy spurge density was reduced by 12.5% and 84.2% after 1 and 4 years of grazing, respectively [195]. In Montana, researchers tested shock collars and invisible fencing to contain goats in leafy spurge-infested areas. While the containment method was successful and leafy spurge comprised the majority of goat diets, "brush and forb species were significantly impacted" [139]. After 3 years of grazing in mixed-grass prairie at a North Dakota National Guard training area, leafy spurge stem densities were unchanged in the cattle-grazed plot, reduced by 70% in the goat-grazed plot (P<0.05), and reduced by 60% in the cattle- and goat-grazed plot (P<0.05). Graminoid herbage production was unchanged by cattle grazing, increased significantly with goat grazing, and decreased significantly with goat and cattle grazing (P<0.05). Shrub utilization was not different among the grazed plots [171].
Several studies evaluated the economics associated with control of leafy spurge by domestic sheep. An economic feasibility study found that the addition of sheep to cattle ranches in Montana yielded positive returns when leafy spurge infested just 10% of a pasture. Positive returns increased with increased leafy spurge abundance and when infestations were concentrated on a few pastures [236]. In another study, Sell and others [197] estimated the economics related to cooperative fall, winter, or spring sheep grazing operations. Only spring grazing showed the potential to generate income, and this potential decreased as acreage infested by leafy spurge increased. Bangsund and others [9] found the economics of different grazing scenarios varied with carrying capacities, leafy spurge spread rates, rangeland productivities, fencing costs, and grazing patterns.
Insects: Many Eurasian insects have been approved and released for biological control of leafy spurge. Insects established in the United States include the leafy spurge hawk moth (Hyles euphorbiae), the red-headed leafy spurge stem borer (Oberea erythrocephala), the leafy spurge tip gall midge (Spurgia esulae), and 5 flea beetle species: Aphthona cyparissiae, A. czwalinae, A. flava, A. lacertosa, and A. nigriscutis [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,71]. By 1996, at least 1 of these insects was established in each of 18 states and 148 counties and produced collectable populations in 16 states and 62 counties [71].
Leafy spurge hawk moth larvae feed on leaves and bracts and are established from Idaho to Nebraska and Minnesota. Alone, leafy spurge hawk moths are ineffective controls [67]. Red-headed leafy spurge stem borer larvae feed in leafy spurge stems and crowns, and adults feed on leaves and stems. As of 2004, stem borers had not "noticeabl(y)" impacted leafy spurge, although established from Oregon to Colorado and Minnesota [68]. Leafy spurge tip gall midge larvae attack leafy spurge growing points and reduce flower and seed production. Gall midges disperse long distances, and as of 2004, occurred from Idaho to Colorado and east to Rhode Island [69]. Flea beetle larvae feed on leafy spurge root hairs and young roots, and adults feed on leaves and flowers. Information about the distribution, biology, ecology, establishment, spread, preferred habitats, and control success for leafy spurge biocontrols in North America is summarized in the following sources: [37,71,156,181].
Flea beetles: So far (2010), flea beetles are the most successful biocontrol agents for leafy spurge in North America [71,156]. As of 2004, flea beetle populations were established nearly throughout the western United States, the northern Great Plains, the Great Lakes states, and in the northeastern states of New York, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire [62,63,64,65,66]. Because flea beetles have provided the most effective control of leafy spurge, they are the most widely dispersed and most studied of the biocontrol insects. Although flea beetles do not eradicate leafy spurge, they can reduce its abundance and negative impacts [142]. An abundance of information is available about flea beetle habitat requirements, population dynamics, maintenance, persistence, and effects on leafy spurge populations. While some information regarding these topics is summarized in the discussions below, the bulk is summarized and described in bibliographical form in Table 1.
Successful flea beetle establishment requires knowledge of their habitat requirements, which are often related to leafy spurge stem densities, soils, and climate. Some studies report good control of leafy spurge by flea beetles in areas with soil-borne pathogens, such as Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium spp. In the greenhouse, leafy spurge damage was more rapid when pathogens and insects occurred together than when either agent occurred alone. The researcher suggested that screening for or adding soil pathogens to flea beetle release sites could improve biocontrol [31,32]. In general, optimal flea beetle release sites occur on south-facing, sunny slopes with dry, loamy soils; however, there are species-specific differences. For instance, A. lacertosa establishes on cool, moist sites and may establish well in draws. Recommended release dates are from mid-June to mid-July, and establishment improves with increased abundance of flea beetles released. At least 1,000 beetles/drop point is recommended. Releasing flea beetles at the edge of dense leafy spurge patches or in sparse points within patches is typically better than releasing them within dense stands. For more information on monitoring, harvesting, storing, transporting, and rereleasing flea beetles, as well as guidelines for integrated control that ensures maintenance of established flea beetle populations, see the review by Merritt and others [142]. Additional information on species-specific habitat preferences is available in Table 2.
Flea beetles can be persistent and provide long-term leafy spurge control; however, control success can vary by site and flea beetle species. On 2 of 3 sites in east-central North Dakota, flea beetle populations were still present and leafy spurge was reduced substantially, even though releases were made 11 to 16 years earlier. Populations of A. lacertosa and A. czwalinae were much larger than those of A. nigriscutis, which had not substantially impacted leafy spurge [104]. Findings were similar along railroad rights of way in North Dakota. Within 4 years of release, A. czwalinae and A. lacertosa populations averaged 79 beetles/m², resulted in leafy spurge stem density reductions of 95% or more, and were impacting leafy spurge more than 330 feet (100 m) from the release site. Within 5 years of release, A. nigristicus populations resulted in leafy spurge stem density reductions of about 60%, although populations never exceeded 10 beetles/m², and impacted leafy spurge only 52 feet (16 m) from the release site [121].
Although flea beetles often decreased abundance of leafy spurge, this decreased abundance can negatively affect flea beetle populations and may not be associated with the recovery of desirable and diverse native plant communities. For 6 years, researchers monitored the establishment and effects of flea beetles on many sites in northwestern South Dakota and southeastern Montana. Aphthona lacertosa and A. czwalinae established on a variety of grassland and shrubland vegetation types; A. nigriscutis was less common and restricted to dry, sandy sites. Leafy spurge cover on and near release sites was significantly lower than prerelease levels (P<0.05). However, as cover of established leafy spurge plants decreased, seedling abundance increased and flea beetle abundance decreased. Grass species cover increased, but the same was not true for forb species [29]. Within 5 years of releasing flea beetles in North Dakota's Little Missouri National Grasslands, leafy spurge stem density was reduced by 90%, and its emergence from soil collected at release sites decreased from 68% to 14%. Abundance of other forbs in the soil at release sites increased, but increases were largest for less desirable and nonnative forbs. The percentage and number of desirable grasses in the soil at release sites decreased. In the greenhouse, the combined average production of green needlegrass, little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and western wheatgrass was significantly (P<0.05) less in soils from release sites than from non-release sites after 8 weeks of growth. At both the release and nonrelease sites, leafy spurge densities were low [35]. Leafy spurge biomass and crown and stem densities were reduced by 60% to 80% with 2 years of inundative flea beetle releases (50 beetles/flowering stem) in riparian areas in Idaho. Cover of other forbs and grasses, however, did not increase [169].
Additional studies and their evaluations on leafy spurge and flea beetle populations are available. Consult Table 1 for a list of these studies and a brief summary of the information they provide.
Biological control of invasive species has a long history that indicates many factors must be considered before using biological controls. Refer to these sources: [223,237] and the Weed control methods handbook [215] for background information and important considerations for developing and implementing biological control programs. Lym [116] provides a review of the biological control of leafy spurge using insects, sheep, and/or goats.
Chemical control: Many sources provide information about the types of chemicals, timing of herbicide applications, and application techniques that are potentially useful in controlling leafy spurge: [2,16,113,115,116]. These studies and reviews are not summarized in detail in this review. See the Weed control methods handbook [215] for considerations on the use of herbicides in natural areas and detailed information on specific chemicals.
Long-term control of leafy spurge, especially large, well-established populations, is unlikely with herbicides alone. In a review, Hansen and others [70] reported that leafy spurge is "extremely difficult to control with herbicides", because of its ability to "purge" chemicals from its root system. In controlled studies, less than 7% of the picloram that was applied to the aboveground portions of leafy spurge occurred in the roots. More than 60% of the chemical had been released and was found in the area surrounding leafy spurge roots [78]. A waxy protective layer on leafy spurge leaves and stems also makes chemical control difficult without addition of a surfactant or wetting agent [57]. Although some indicate that proper timing of herbicide applications can improve control and prevent seed production (Messersmith personal communication cited in [1,75,206]), long-term control of leafy spurge with herbicides alone is unlikely and often economically infeasible. For more information on potentially improving the timing of chemical treatments, see Root carbohydrate storage.
Studies have uncovered several issues related to the control of leafy spurge with herbicides. These issues include the need for continual treatments, lack of long-term control, detrimental effects on associated vegetation, and high treatment costs. In tallgrass prairie in North Dakota, leafy spurge still dominated the seed bank the year after 2 applications of various herbicides, suggesting that it was likely to dominate the recovering vegetation [95]. Although leafy spurge abundance was reduced substantially after 20 years of annual herbicide treatments at Devil's Tower National Monument in Wyoming, populations were not eradicated. Researchers suggested that preventing population spread would require continuing spot herbicide treatments indefinitely [16]. A single herbicide treatment in a leafy spurge-infested grassland near Grass Range, Montana, was associated with long-term decreases in some native forbs and likely an increased abundance of leafy spurge. Prairie goldenrod (Solidago missouriensis) and western yarrow (Achillea millefolium) did not recover to pretreatment population levels even 16 years after the herbicide application, regardless of posttreatment grazing. Velvety goldenrod (S. mollis), white prairie aster (Symphyotrichum falcatum), American vetch (Vicia americana), and fringed sagebrush (Artemisia frigida) were significantly rarer after the herbicide treatment when plots were not grazed. Researchers concluded that when managing nonnative, invasive species, "the treatment can be worse than the disease" [185].
Several studies report that chemical control of leafy spurge, especially large populations, is often cost prohibitive [116]. A rancher in central Montana spent $25,000 over 2 seasons to apply herbicides to leafy spurge and described treatment results as like having "put fertilizer on the stuff" (Elliot 1997 cited in [40]). In a weed management review, Fay [52] reports that "eradication of well established leafy spurge patches with herbicides is nearly impossible. The picloram rates needed for control (of leafy spurge) are four to eight times the rates used for spotted knapweed" (Centaurea maculosa), making large population treatments extremely costly. Based on rangeland condition factors including grazing values, carrying capacities, leafy spurge spread rates, herbicide effectiveness, and treatment costs, researchers reported that "the levels of productivity at which most herbicide treatment programs break even is higher than the levels of productivity found in much of North Dakota's grazing land" [8]. Lym and Messersmith [120] provide more information about the costs associated with chemical treatment of leafy spurge.
While herbicides are often effective in gaining initial control of a new invasion or a severe infestation, they are rarely a complete or long-term solution to weed management [27]. Some studies report improved control or herbicide effectiveness when chemical treatments were combined with other control methods; however, long-term control was rarely evaluated. In North Dakota's Little Missouri National Grassland, leafy spurge was reduced at least initially when a fall herbicide treatment was followed by a spring fire [82]. Along rights of way in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, leafy spurge was nearly eliminated after sites were twice treated with herbicides followed by fall fires. Treated sites were dominated by yellow foxtail (Setaria pumila subsp. pumila) and witchgrass (Panicum capillare) immediately following 2 years of treatments [17]. In North Dakota grasslands, control of leafy spurge was better on plots treated with herbicide and biocontrols or herbicide and grass seeding than on plots treated with herbicide alone. Survival and growth of flea beetles could likely be improved by releasing them 1 year after herbicide treatments or releasing them in a refuge near the treated area [87]. For more on combining control methods to manage leafy spurge, see Integrated management below.
Integrated management: Several studies evaluated leafy spurge control using herbicides and/or fire together with biocontrols or posttreatment grass seeding. Combining goat grazing and herbicide treatments or herbicides and grass seeding often provided better control than either treatment alone; however, using herbicides with insect biocontrols rarely improved long-term leafy spurge control.
Biocontrols and herbicides: In North Dakota's Sheyenne National Grassland, goat grazing followed by a fall herbicide treatment reduced leafy spurge density more quickly and provided longer control than either method alone. However, several years after the treatments, differences between single and combination treatments were not always significant (P<0.05) [123]. Leafy spurge stem densities were reduced more rapidly when herbicides were used on sites with established flea beetle populations, but once flea beetles populations were established for 5 to 12 years, leafy spurge stems densities were rarely significantly different between herbicide-treated or untreated plots [122]. Findings were similar in leafy spurge-infested silver sagebrush-grasslands in Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota. Within 3 years of herbicide treatment, density of leafy spurge stems was not significantly different on flea beetle sites with and without herbicide treatment. The herbicide-treated plots, however, did have significantly fewer flea beetles than untreated plots 1 and 2 years later (P<0.05) [105].
Herbicides and/or fire and grass seeding: Several studies suggest that herbicide application and/or burning followed by grass seeding can provide leafy spurge control, which may persist for several years. An herbicide treatment followed by seeding of brome (Bromus spp.), wheatgrass (Agropyron spp.), or wildrye (Elymus spp.) cultivars often reduced leafy spurge stem densities [124]. Seven to 10 years following an herbicide treatment and no-till seeding of wildrye and wheatgrass in Crook County, Wyoming, leafy spurge cover was at least 20% lower than on control plots [54]. On a floodplain in the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge, 2 years after plots were herbicide treated and seeded with little bluestem or mixed grasses, leafy spurge cover was significantly reduced from pretreatment levels (P<0.05). On plots treated only with herbicides, control of leafy spurge was noted for only 1 year [15].
Leafy spurge was controlled in mixed-grass prairie sites in Nebraska, at least temporarily, after native grasses or grass-legume mixes were seeded on sites prepared through a combination of mowing, burning, and/or herbicide treatments. Leafy spurge abundance was lower and forage abundance was higher in treated than untreated plots. Long-term control of leafy spurge was not evaluated [133,134]. For additional information on controlling leafy spurge through the integrated use of herbicides, fire, and revegetation, see Masters and others [135].
Cattle and horses avoid leafy spurge, while domestic goats and sheep readily graze it. Leafy spurge seeds are consumed by mourning doves [5], and nesting success of western meadowlarks was positively associated with leafy spurge cover in North Dakota [193]. More information about leafy spurge Palatability and/or nutritional value is provided below.
Cattle avoid grazing leafy spurge and will focus on other vegetation in infested areas; this selective grazing can promote leafy spurge spread and seedling establishment [33,117]. In Grassrange, Montana, cattle avoided grazing in areas with moderate to high leafy spurge abundance [76]. In southeastern North Dakota, cattle grazed only in areas without leafy spurge early in the growing season. In mid-summer, cattle avoided areas with moderate to high leafy spurge densities and utilized just 2% of the vegetation in areas with low leafy spurge density, even though stocking rates exceeded the recommended rates by 21%. In the fall, utilization of leafy spurge-infested areas increased to 60%, 50%, and 41% in areas with low, moderate, and high densities of leafy spurge [118].
The milky sap produced by leafy spurge can cause severe diarrhea in cattle and horses. However, leafy spurge is avoided by these animals unless no other forage is available. Leafy spurge sap can also cause blistering and hair loss around horses' hooves. This type of injury is common if horses are put in a recently mowed, leafy spurge-infested pasture [14].
Domestic sheep and goats are not typically harmed by grazing leafy spurge and have been successfully used to control it (see the Biological control section). In central Montana, domestic sheep grazed all phenological stages of leafy spurge in infested areas and suffered no ill effects or substantial weight loss [102]. However, in a leafy spurge-infested area near Pearce, Alberta, sheep grazed small plants but were "reluctant" to graze mature plants. Researchers reported that some sheep died of leafy spurge poisoning in the first year of grazing relatively large plants [85]. In North Dakota's Sheyenne National Grasslands, angora goats grazed areas where leafy spurge and Kentucky bluegrass together made up 44% to 69% of the total available forage. Leafy spurge made up more than 40% of goat diets and more than 50% of all fecal collections over a 2-year period [94].
Domestic sheep and goats as well as native ungulates are potential dispersers of leafy spurge seed. For details, see Seed dispersal.
Birds: Leafy spurge seed is consumed by mourning doves [5] and provides suitable nesting habitat for western meadowlarks. In North Dakota's Sheyenne National Grassland, western meadowlark nesting success was positively related to leafy spurge cover [193]. Other bird populations and their nesting success were negatively related to leafy spurge abundance. For more information, see Impacts on wildlife.
Bees: Beekeepers use leafy spurge as an early-season honeybee food. Honey produced by bees feeding on leafy spurge is bitter. Leafy spurge honey is fed back to bees in the winter because it freezes at a lower temperature than honey from other sources [117].
Palatability and/or nutritional value: Lym [117] reports that leafy spurge is an "acceptable and nutritious" food for domestic sheep and goats. Leafy spurge elaiosomes removed by western thatching ants in Park County, Montana, were 25.4 % fat and 18.2% protein [164].
Researchers compared the nutritional value of leafy spurge and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) throughout the growing season in various North Dakota locations and found that nutrient levels were adequate for young, mature, and nursing domestic sheep and goats. The study did not evaluate whether nutritional value impacted palatability [91]. In Montana's Gallatin County, growing-season crude protein and digestibility of leafy spurge were almost always higher than those of Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) [157].
McDonnell [138], director of market information and public lands for the American Sheep Industry Association, reported that leafy spurge protein levels are higher than those of many grasses in the spring and summer. According to McDonnell [138], weight gains for ewes grazing leafy spurge were not different than those grazing grasses. Lambing difficulties, including reduced lamb weights or reduced lamb percentages, were not reported when sheep were grazing leafy spurge. Young lambs grazing leafy spurge had significantly higher average daily weight gains than lambs grazing grass. In studies from Idaho to North Dakota, researchers found that soil fertility may affect leafy spurge palatability. Domestic sheep preferred leafy spurge on highly fertile sites [96].
Grasslands, riparian areas, shrublands, and savannas are common habitat for leafy spurge in its native and nonnative ranges. In Europe, leafy spurge is often associated with sandy sites, is especially
common in dry meadows, and often occurs along roads and stream banks (review by [200]).
In North America, leafy spurge occupies a variety of habitat types and plant communities but
"exhibits maximum vigor" in ungrazed, native grasslands [199].
Researchers reported that in Saskatchewan leafy spurge occurs "in almost every conceivable
habitat, with the exception of boreal forest" (reviews by [199,200]).
Throughout Canada's southern provinces, leafy spurge is most common in prairies, savannas, and open woodlands [235]. In Massachusetts, leafy spurge occurs in grasslands
and coastal habitats [131], and in Wisconsin, it "flourishes in open-grown oak woods"
(reviews by [199,200]).
Numerous vegetation types are described for leafy spurge habitats in the western and Great Plains regions of the United States. Leafy spurge is especially common in prairies, meadows, and woodlands [16,79,213].
In eastern Oregon's John Day River Basin, leafy spurge occurs in Lewis' mockorange-mallow ninebark-oceanspray (Philadelphus lewisii-Physocarpus malvaceus-Holodiscus discolor) and big sagebrush/western juniper/cheatgrass-bluebunch wheatgrass (Artemisia tridentata/Juniperus occidentalis/Bromus tectorum-Pseudoroegneria spicata) vegetation types along shallow streams but achieves its greatest importance value in big sagebrush communities [129]. Throughout sagebrush ecosystems in the Intermountain West,
leafy spurge is described as "highly invasive and competitive" [172].
After stream surveys, researchers estimated that leafy spurge occupied 3.5% of perennial stream
length in the western United States and 20.2% of perennial stream length in the Great Plains.
In North Dakota and South Dakota, leafy spurge occupied 59% and 13.8% of perennial stream length, respectively [187]. Leafy spurge occurred on Montana's Pine Butte Swamp Preserve;
it formed near monocultures in some grasslands, riparian areas, and limber pine savannas [177].
In North Dakota's Theodore Roosevelt National Park, researchers identified 11 plant associations that were "particularly susceptible" to invasion by leafy spurge including floodplain, grassland, shrubland, and woodland communities. In silver sagebrush (A. cana), creeping juniper
(J. horizontalis), and prairie sandreed (Calamovilfa longifolia) associations,
species richness was significantly lower in leafy spurge infested than noninfested plots
(P<0.05) [28].
General phenology: Several studies from the northern Great Plains region of North America have reported details regarding leafy spurge phenology. Seedlings typically emerge in the spring (see Emergence timing for details). In Saskatchewan, leafy spurge shoots emerge from established plants from mid-April to early May and flowers appear by early to late May, sometimes within a week of emergence [199]. Flowering and seed development are continuous, generally occurring from late April to mid-August; sometimes they occur into late October or November. Leafy spurge disperses most seed by mid-September [199,200]. Flowering and seed production can be delayed if leafy spurge plants are disturbed [12]. In northwestern Iowa, leafy spurge is one of the first weeds to emerge in the spring. By mid-April shoots may be 6 inches (15 cm) tall. Plants are in full bloom by the first of June and produce seed from June until the first freeze. The same leafy spurge stem can produce seed over a period several weeks long period and also produce more than 1 seed crop/season [5].
Regional flowering dates: Leafy spurge generally begins to flower in May. Flowers are later, typically in June, in northern California [151], northern Nevada [90], and in Fargo, North Dakota [209]. Flowering occurs only until June in California [151] and Nevada [90] but extends into August in the rest of the Intermountain West [43]. Flowering occurs from May to September in northern New Mexico [130], the Great Plains [11,60], and West Virginia [212]. Flowers may occur on leafy spurge until October in the northeastern United States [128].
When grown and monitored for 2 years in field plots in Saskatchewan or Ontario, the flowering period of artificially produced Euphorbia × pseudoesula hybrids was longer than that of either parent in the same area. Hybrids flowered first from early May to late June and generally produced flowers again that lasted through late September. A second flowering flush was not observed for leafy spurge or cypress spurge [146].
Root carbohydrate storage: Several studies report fluctuations in leafy spurge's root carbohydrate stores, which are usually lowest in spring. Study findings may be useful in determining optimal timing of control measures. Total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) stored in the roots of leafy spurge in Fargo, North Dakota, reached a maximum in mid-summer and early fall and were lowest in early spring [119]. In south-central Nebraska, researchers found that TNC began accumulating in leafy spurge roots after flowering in mid-July. New root buds did not develop until late August or early September, suggesting that translocation of carbohydrates was greatest from late September to the first freeze, which researchers suggested may represent an effective time for herbicide treatments [206]. For leafy spurge plants in Washington County, Minnesota, readily available carbohydrates and total carbohydrate stores were low at the flowering stage (mid-May) and again in early July [3]. Root carbohydrate stores for leafy spurge plants in a field near Guelph, Ontario, were not substantially affected by defoliation [44]. While the above studies may be useful to leafy spurge control and management, the substantial regenerative capacity of a very small root piece (see Vegetative regeneration) suggests that leafy spurge regrowth may not be limited by low amounts of root carbohydrate stores.
Leafy spurge produces unisexual flowers on typically monoecious plants [98,234]. Flowers are primarily pollinated by insects [5,200]. Although researchers found a leafy spurge population in Saskatchewan that produced only female flowers, dioecious plants are rare [199].
Leafy spurge is protogynous, and self-fertilization is limited. Because leafy spurge produces sticky pollen, wind pollination of flowers is unlikely [5]. While wind is not important to pollen dispersal, it may cause flower contact. When flowering leafy spurge shoots were located near a fan but protected from insects, a few capsules developed [199].
Insects are important to pollination of leafy spurge flowers, and typically cross-pollination results in greater seed production than self-pollination. Seed was rarely produced on leafy spurge stems protected from insects, but on unprotected stems seed production was normal. The low levels of seed production on protected stems were likely the result of incomplete protection, since the researcher observed an ant inside the protection screen. In a greenhouse study, leafy spurge failed to produce seed until the insect-free area was contaminated by a house fly [200]. In artificial pollination experiments, 28% of flowers produced seed when female flowers were pollinated by male flowers from the same inflorescence; 41.3% of flowers produced seed when female flowers were pollinated by male flowers from the same stem; and 56.4% of flowers produced seed when female flowers were pollinated by male flowers from different plants [199,200]. During experiments on leafy spurge in a prairie near Grand Forks, North Dakota, 63% of female flowers pollinated by male flowers at least 82 feet (25 m) away produced seed, and 29% of self-fertilized female flowers produced seed [196].
Many insect visitors have been observed on leafy spurge flowers. During weekly growing-season collections made in Jameson, Saskatchewan, researchers identified 196 insect species associated with leafy spurge patches. The insects represented 13 orders and 84 families. There was little damage to leafy spurge plants, suggesting that most insects were utilizing leafy spurge pollen and nectar sources (Maw unpublished data cited in [14]). The soldier beetle (Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus) pollinated leafy spurge flowers in a field in Iowa [5]. Selleck [200] observed ants, bees, flies, and mosquitoes feeding on leafy spurge nectar in Saskatchewan.
Few studies specifically addressed the maximum longevity of the leafy spurge seed bank. Of the seed bank studies available, very few reported leafy spurge germination after more than 5 years in the soil. During field and laboratory studies conducted at the University of Saskatchewan, Selleck [198,200] found that some leafy spurge seeds germinated after 5 years in soil, but 99% of germination occurred in the first 2 years of burial. Seeds stored in metal containers at room temperature were still viable after 13 years [198,200].
Increased depth of burial may result in increased retention of viability in the leafy spurge seed bank. In Saskatchewan, leafy spurge seeds buried in mesh bags in fine sandy loam at 1-inch (2.5 cm), 2-inch (5 cm), 4-inch (10 cm), and 8-inch (20 cm) depths for 3 years had 12%, 18%, 43%, and 64% viability, respectively (Banting unpublished data cited in [14]). In a field study in Iowa, 61% and 68% of leafy spurge seeds germinated after 4 years of burial at 4 to 6 inches (10-15 cm) and 16 to 18 inches (40-46 cm) deep, respectively [26].
In Saskatchewan, the leafy spurge seed bank was depleted to 15 germinable seeds/m² after 8 years of continuous domestic sheep grazing. Seed bank density remained high (>4,800 germinable seeds/m²) on control sites and on sites treated with an herbicide 1 to 3 years earlier (<3,500 germinable seeds/m²) [21].
Seeds are forcibly ejected up to 15 feet (4.5 m) from mature, dry leafy spurge capsules [198]. Even longer distance seed dispersal is possible by animals [97,162,164,227] and water [36,199].
Capsule ejection: Researchers conducted indoor and outdoor experiments to determine normal and maximum seed ejection distances from leafy spurge capsules. Indoors the maximum ejection distance was 13.3 feet (4 m), and many seeds were 9 feet (2.7 m) from the stems. Outdoors the maximum ejection distance was 13.5 feet (4.1 m), which was also the maximum radius of the seed-catching canvas, so longer distance dispersal may have occurred. Just 1 seed fell within 1 foot (0.3 m) of the fruiting stalks. Researchers found no relationships between ejection distance and temperature, humidity, or sunlight levels [72]. While weather conditions may not affect ejection distance, they may affect ejection potential. In Saskatchewan, capsules did not explode on cloudy days but did eject seeds after 0.5 hour of sunshine. The researcher concluded that high temperatures and low humidity trigger eruption of leafy spurge capsules [200].
Animals: Domestic grazers, deer, game birds, and ants disperse leafy spurge seed. When leafy spurge seeds were fed to domestic sheep and goats, 14% of seeds passed by sheep were viable and 2% germinated; 31% of seeds passed by goats were viable and 16% germinated. Sheep passed all seeds in 9 days, and goats passed all seeds in 5 days [97]. In another study, sheep passed more mature than immature leafy spurge seeds, and the viability of recovered seed increased with seed maturity (0% for seeds in the soft dough stage, 41.4% in the hard dough stage, and 81.3% for mature seeeds) [160]. In a leafy spurge-infested rangeland in Gallatin County, Montana, sheep excreted 144 leafy spurge seeds/day at a time of peak seed production. Of the excreted seeds, 0 to 17 seeds/day were viable. Each shorn fleece averaged 38.7 leafy spurge seeds, but researchers doubted seeds in the fleece would be dispersed before being sheared or processed [162].
White-tailed deer, wild turkeys, sharp-tailed grouse, mourning doves, and ants are potential dispersers of leafy spurge seed. In northeastern Montana and western North Dakota, 1 leafy spurge seed germinated from collected deer feces. During feeding trials, however, the total viability of leafy spurge seeds passed by white-tailed deer ranged from 10.5% to 20.4%. Seeds were passed for 4 days, and viability was greatest for seeds passed 2 days after ingestion. No leafy spurge seedlings emerged from wild turkey feces collected from the same area, but in feeding trials, up to 53.8% of passed seeds were viable. In sharp-tailed grouse feeding trials, 2% to 25% of passed seeds were viable. For both wild turkeys and sharp-tailed grouse, only those seeds passed the first day after ingestion were viable [227]. From a sharp-tailed grouse dropping collected in North Dakota, 2 leafy spurge seedlings emerged [154]. Some leafy spurge seed collected from mourning dove crops germinated, but seeds from the digestive tract did not. Likely the only chance for dispersal would occur when parents regurgitate food for their young [5]. However, in north-central North Dakota, intact leafy spurge seeds were recovered from the feces of nestling mourning doves at 10 of 12 nests sites. Of the 110 recovered seeds, 25 germinated. Adult mourning doves did not pass intact seeds, suggesting that dispersal potential decreases with dove maturity [19].
Leafy spurge seeds have elaiosomes, which aid in dispersal by some ants. A study conducted in a big sagebrush-mixed-grassland in Park County, Montana, suggests that western thatching ants (Formica obscuripes) disperse leafy spurge seed. Ants removed 65% of seeds with elaiosomes and only 29% of seeds without elaiosomes. Level of seed removal was not significantly different between areas with high or low leafy spurge densities, but significantly fewer seeds were removed when caches were placed 330 feet (100 m) away from leafy spurge plants (P<0.05). The fate of seeds taken to the nests is unknown, but other ant species are known to discard seeds from their nests following removal of the elaiosome. Leafy spurge plants were often found on or near ant nests [164]. In Saskatchewan, boreal formicine ants (Lasius spp.) did not feed on the elaiosomes of leafy spurge seeds and did not store seeds in their burrows [199].
Water: Leafy spurge seeds can float in water [5] and survive underwater storage [36]. After 5 years of underwater storage in a canal in Prosser, Washington, a very small proportion of leafy spurge seeds germinated, but 90% of seeds remained firm [36]. Leafy spurge is often found along waterways, and sporadic populations often occur downstream from established stands. In southern Saskatchewan, leafy spurge populations often followed the contours of shallow basins that drained away surface water. Infestations followed some drainages for 600 feet (180 m) [199]. In the southern Rocky Mountains of Colorado, leafy spurge was absent from riparian areas downstream of dams [141].
Leafy spurge can produce abundant seed, but first-year plants do not produce seed [199]. Mature seeds develop about 30 days after pollination [20].
Several studies report high levels of seed production by leafy spurge. An "average-sized", well developed leafy spurge plant growing with little competition in North Dakota produced 140 seeds/main stem at a time when maximum seed production was likely [210]. Average seed rain in the center of leafy spurge patches in Saskatchewan was 2,500 seeds/m². Seed rain ranged from 790 to 8,020 seeds/m² (Thomas unpublished data cited in [14]).
Leafy spurge seed yield can be affected by habitat and climate. In an Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass vegetation type in Gallatin County, Montana, leafy spurge seed production was much greater in cool, wet springs than in warm, dry springs [159]. In Saskatchewan, leafy spurge seed production was greatest (252 seeds/stem) in a native grassland and lowest (196 seeds/stem) in an old field seeded to crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum). A maximum of 426 seeds/leafy spurge stem was recorded in a north-facing grassland [199,200]. At one site in Saskatchewan, leafy spurge seed production was rare over an 8-year period, and no seedlings emerged from collected soil samples. Additional observations revealed no male flowers. When plants from this site were planted near another leafy spurge population with male flowers, seed was produced. Seed yield in various leafy spurge stands in Saskatchewan ranged from 24 to 3,400 lbs/acre [199].
Most leafy spurge seedlings emerge early in the spring, although sporadic emergence can occur throughout the growing season (Thomas unpublished data cited in [14]). Soil texture, soil fertility, soil disturbances, and the presence of competing vegetation can affect leafy spurge seedling establishment, growth, and survival.
Emergence timing: Emergence of leafy spurge seedlings in the spring often follows heavy precipitation (Thomas unpublished data cited in [14]). Emergence can occur when temperatures are near freezing [16]. Although spring emergence is most common, in a field in Iowa, leafy spurge emergence was low (2% or less) from late April to late September, except in late August when emergence was 20% [26]. When freshly ripe seeds were sown in the summer in a North Dakota old field, 50% germinated the following spring. Of these, less than 10% were alive on 15 May [72].
Seedling morphology, physiology: Leafy spurge seedlings grow rapidly and are capable of vegetative regeneration soon after emergence. In the greenhouse, 2-day old leafy spurge seedlings were 0.7 inch (1.8 cm) tall with 2.5-inch (6.4 cm) long roots. At 24 days old, seedlings were 2.5 inches (6.4 cm) tall with 7-inch (18 cm) roots [200]. Hanson and Rudd [72] reported that roots of a "vigorous" leafy spurge seedling can reach 24 inches (61 cm) deep within 2 weeks of producing cotyledons.
Leafy spurge seedlings do not flower in their 1st year but are capable of vegetative regeneration within a week of emergence. Fifteen-day-old seedlings produced an average of 4.7 vegetative root buds. In the field, 5% of 7-day-old seedlings sprouted after being severed 1 inch (2.5 cm) below the soil surface [198,200]. The main leafy spurge seedling shoot usually does not survive beyond the 1st growing season and is replaced by an adventitious shoot from the root crown in the 2nd growing season [16].
Soil texture, moisture, fertility: Leafy spurge seedling emergence and survival can be higher on fine- than coarse-textured soils. In old fields in Saskatchewan, leafy spurge seedling densities of 2,800 seedlings/m² were common in the spring. As the growing season progressed, seedling densities typically decreased to 1,000 seedlings/m² on fine-textured soils and 500 seedlings/m² on coarse-textured soils. Dry conditions led to even greater seedling mortality [199].
Seedling shoot, lateral root, and root bud production can be greater on high- than low-nitrogen soils. Raju and others [176] reported poor seedling survival during extreme growing-season drought conditions. In the greenhouse, the height of leafy spurge seedlings at low nitrogen levels was about half that at high nitrogen levels, but length of the primary root increased slightly with nitrogen deficiency. Lateral root production was "greatly promoted" at high nitrogen levels, and the number of root buds averaged 59.9, 40.4, and 29.9 at high, medium, and low nitrogen levels. Following stem removal, regrowth averaged 7, 3.2, and 0.6 stems/pot at high, medium, and low nitrogen levels [140].
Soil disturbances and competing vegetation: Soil disturbances and low vegetation cover are associated with increased leafy spurge seedling establishment, growth, and survival. Vertical seedling root growth is more extensive, and production of root buds is earlier in areas with low vegetation cover or no associated vegetation than in areas with high cover [176]. In mixed-grass prairie in Manitoba, Canada, researchers located 83 distinct leafy spurge patches. Of these, 79 were associated with visible soil disturbance [13]. In the mixed-grass prairie on a military training site at Shilo, Manitoba, frequency of leafy spurge increased with increased frequency of bare ground [238].
In a field study near Regina, Saskatchewan, leafy spurge emergence and survival were greater in cultivated than undisturbed portions of a native grassland or western snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis) patch. Emergence and survival of leafy spurge seedlings was lowest in undisturbed grassland. The only leafy spurge plants to flower in the 3rd growing season occurred in the cultivated plot [14]:
Emergence and survival of leafy spurge seeded* in disturbed and undisturbed habitats in Saskatchewan [14] Habitat Native grassland Cultivated plot Western snowberry patch Total emergence after 2 yearsIn a plowed and weeded area near Mandan, North Dakota, the early growth of leafy spurge plants from seeds was similar to early growth from root fragments. In dense crested wheatgrass and smooth brome, however, seedlings were significantly smaller than sprouts from root fragments. In the sod, no plants from seed or root produced flowers or more than 1 shoot by end of the 2nd growing season. In the plowed and weeded area, all plants from roots and 6 of 8 seedlings produced seed in the 1st growing season [148].
Height (cm) of leafy spurge plants in the 1st and 2nd growing seasons after planting seeds or root pieces in areas with and without interference from other plants [148] Plant source Sod Plowed and kept weed free 1st growing season (4 months after planting) Root 15b 44a Seed 3c 34a 2nd growing season (16 months after planting) Root 15a 67a Seed 6b 62a Values in the same column and growing season followed by different letters are significantly different (P<0.05).Although disturbed, open sites are best for leafy spurge seedling establishment, once established, vegetative regeneration allows for persistence in most habitats with or without subsequent disturbances. In Saskatchewan and Wisconsin, leafy spurge persists but may produce little or no seed in shaded habitats. Leafy spurge occurred in shaded woodland areas in Saskatchwan and Wisconsin. Shade was measured with a light meter, which read about 60 in open habitat. Leafy spurge occurred under a quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) canopy where the light meter reading was 3; it flowered where the light reading was 6. It "flourishe(d)" in bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) stands with 65% to 75% canopy cover and produced seed in areas with a light meter reading of 10. In Saskatchewan, leafy spurge spread "consistently" with competition from western snowberry. Vegetative spread of 2 leafy spurge seedlings in a western snowberry patch averaged about 1 foot (0.3 m)/year for 4 years [200]. Leafy spurge density increased "markedly" in 6 years of succession on a recently abandoned field in Saskatchewan. As succession progressed from annual to perennial species dominance, the percentage of leafy spurge shoots producing flowers decreased from 71% to 37% [199].
Disturbance relationships: Leafy spurge establishes well on disturbed sites but also in areas with little or no disturbance [178]. In southern Saskatchewan, 56% of leafy spurge populations occurred in areas under cultivation, 23% occurred in abandoned fields, and 21% occurred in areas that were never cultivated [199]. Once established, leafy spurge is highly tolerant of disturbance. In a field experiment, leafy spurge stem density increased with tilling. There were 134 leafy spurge stems/m² in the undisturbed plot and 316 stems/m² in the tilled plot [199]. Disturbed sites can serve as gateways into undisturbed stable vegetation. After leafy spurge established on a gopher mound in Saskatchewan, populations increased and persisted in "climax", ungrazed needlegrass-grama (Stipa-Bouteloua spp.) grasslands (reviews by [199,200]).
Cattle grazing can increase leafy spurge abundance. Heavy, continuous gazing by domestic sheep and goats can reduce leafy spurge abundance (see Importance to Livestock and Biological Control); once goats or sheep are removed, however, leafy spurge recovers. Cattle avoid leafy spurge and graze on associated vegetation, which can remove competition and provide open sites for subsequent leafy spurge establishment and spread [33,117]. In field experiments designed to simulate goat grazing in North Dakota's Sheyenne National Grasslands, leafy spurge cover increased significantly (P<0.05) when defoliated annually for 4 years at the vegetative and regrowth stages (mid-May and early September, respectively). Leafy spurge cover also increased significantly in unclipped plots. Stem densities were reduced by an average of 55% when defoliated twice a year for 4 years—once before flowering and again at the regrowth stage [93].
The scientific name of leafy spurge is Euphorbia esula subg. Esula L.
(Euphorbiaceae) [42,58,89,155].
Kartesz [89] recognizes 3 leafy spurge varieties: leafy spurge
(Euphorbia esula var. esula), Oriental leafy spurge (E. esula var. orientalis), and Russian leafy spurge (E. esula var. uralensis). Plants Database [221] recognizes only 2 varieties: leafy spurge and Russian leafy spurge. However, after analyzing 26 morphological characters for 600 Euphorbia species within the Esula subgenus,
Crompton and others [42] concluded that in North America, leafy spurge is a
single, variable species and has hybridized only with cypress spurge (E. cyparissias).
Considerable taxonomic confusion surrounds leafy spurge varieties, subspecies,
and hybrids (see the Synonyms section below). Likely multiple introductions of leafy spurge into
North America resulted in a complex of variable genotypes [114].
Hybrids: Only the tetraploid cypress spurge type is known to hybridize with leafy spurge [147,167], resulting in the hybrid, Euphorbia × pseudoesula Schur. [42,146,147,174]. In Canada, Euphorbia × pseudoesula has been collected from British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Ontario [207], but hybrids are possible anywhere leafy spurge and the tetraploid cypress spurge type occur together.
Leafy spurge can spread, regenerate, and reproduce prolifically from the root crown, root buds, and root pieces. Studies report very few limitations to successful vegetative regeneration. Very young and repeatedly damaged leafy spurge plants can regenerate. Small, deeply buried leafy spurge root pieces can develop into new plants. Spread by root growth and root sprouting is rapid and rampant. Leafy spurge persistence depends on vegetative regeneration.
Leafy spurge seedlings are capable of vegetative regeneration within a week of emergence. By 15 days old, leafy spurge seedlings had an average of 4.7 root buds. In the field, 5% of 7-day-old seedlings sprouted after being cut 1 inch (2.5 cm) below the soil surface. Plants emerging from root pieces can produce seed within 7 weeks of emergence [198,200].
In Saskatchewan, leafy spurge plants survived 8 years of shoot damage or removal by domestic sheep. After 8 years of grazing there were 5 to 10 leafy spurge shoots/m². Within 2 years of removing continuous grazing pressure, shoot densities were recovering to those levels present before intensive grazing [21].
Very small, partially dried, and deeply buried leafy spurge root fragments are capable of producing new plants. Three weeks after planting leafy spurge root pieces that ranged from 0.25 to 4 inches (0.6-10 cm) long in moist, clay soils outdoors in North Dakota, there was no emergence from the 0.25-inch pieces (0.6 cm), but 60% of the 0.5-inch (1.3 cm) pieces sprouted. Generally, the rate and height of shoot growth was positively correlated to root fragment size. Growth from the root pieces was rapid. Within about a month, 2-inch (5 cm) root pieces had developed stems that were 4 inches (10 cm) tall and roots that were 8 inches (20 cm) long. Within about 3 months, stems were 10 inches (25 cm) tall, vertical roots were 43 inches (109 cm) long, and horizontal roots were 12 inches (30.5 cm) long. No planted leafy spurge root fragments sprouted after being dried for 3 hours on a soil surface that was 106 to 118 °F (41-48 °C) and where the relative humidity was 45%. Only 1 of 20 root fragments dried to 13.4% moisture content produced sprouts [72].
Although the majority of shoots come from leafy spurge roots within the top 1 foot (0.3 m) of soil, excavation experiments revealed that regeneration is possible from deeply buried roots and from root fragments collected from great depths. On a leafy spurge plant excavated from a field in Iowa, a shoot was found growing from a root bud 10 feet (3 m) deep. The excavated plant was estimated at 10 years old [5]. A root piece obtained from a 48-inch (122 cm) depth sprouted, and during excavation, researchers found a shoot growing on a root 71 inches (180 cm) below the soil surface. When a leafy spurge plant was buried with 3 feet (1 m) of tamped, clean soil, shoots emerged within a year. Shoots also emerged within a year where plants and soil were excavated to a 3-foot (1 m) depth and the excavation area was filled with tamped, clean soil [39]. The survival of emerging shoots typically decreased with depth of burial, but shoots emerged for 5 successive years from 3-foot-deep (1 m) excavation areas [199].
Rates of vegetative spread: Through root growth and sprouting, leafy spurge can occupy a large area in a short time. Radial vegetative spread of a leafy spurge patch can be 0.5 to 11 feet (0.2-3 m) annually [198]. In a field in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, where 100 leafy spurge seeds were planted, 7 seedlings emerged, and at the end of the growing season, seedlings occupied 2 ft² (0.2 m²). After 3 years, 223 ft² (21 m²) was occupied, and after 5 years, 470 ft² (44 m²) was occupied. Delayed germination as well as vegetative growth may have attributed to spread [199,200], and initial size of the seeded area was not reported. In Mandan, North Dakota, a single leafy spurge root fragment planted in an open area that was kept free of other vegetation occupied a 10-foot (3 m) diameter area in the first year [148]. Using a rudimentary patch expansion model together with patch density and spread information in the field, researchers estimated that a single leafy spurge plant could occupy 452 ft² (42 m²) in 10 years, 3,300 ft² (300 m²) in 20 years, and 4,000 m² in 63 years, assuming unrestricted growth [10]. In Saskatchewan, the average annual rate of spread was greatest (2.6 feet (0.8 m)) in an ungrazed native grassland and lowest (1.4 feet (0.4 m)) in a 3-year-old crested wheatgrass field. Individual patch size increases varied considerably; 1 especially vigorous patch occupied 7 ft² (0.6 m²) in 1951 and 2,610 ft² (242 m²) in 1956 [200]. Although some spread may have been due to seedling establishment, the contribution was likely low. Best and others [14] found that vegetative regeneration was more important than sexual reproduction to the persistence and spread of established leafy spurge stands. Findings are summarized below.
Emergence and survival of seedlings and vegetative sprouts on 3 plots of dense leafy spurge near Regina, Saskatchewan [14] Year 1975 1976 1977 Seedlings emerging/m² 389 267 168 % of seedlings surviving to end of season 12 0 14 Shoots emerging from crown or root/m² 355 0 365 % of vegetative shoots surviving to end of season 90 0 91Euphorbia esula L., ye una especie fanerógama perteneciente a la familia de les euforbiacees. Ta incluyida na llista 100 de les especies exótiques invasores más dañibles del mundu[1] de la Unión Internacional pal Caltenimientu de la Naturaleza.
Ye una especie nativa del centru y sur d'Europa (norte d'Inglaterra, los Países Baxos y Alemaña), y escontra l'este al traviés de la mayor parte d'Asia al norte del Himalaya a Corea y Siberia oriental.[2][3][4]
Ye una planta yerbácea perenne qu'algama los 1-1,2 m d'altor, con tarmos ramificaos dende la base. Los tarmos son llisos, peludos o un pocu peludo. Les fueyes son pequeñes, llanceolaes, de 4-8.5 cm de llargu y hasta 1 cm d'anchu, con un marxe llixeramente onduláu. Les flores son pequeñes, producíes n'umbeles con un par basal de color verde-mariellu brilloso de pétalos como bráctees. Les agrupaciones de bráctees apaecen a la fin de la primavera, ente que les flores reales nun se desenvuelven hasta principios de branu. Toles partes de la planta contienen una cazumbre tóxica de color blancu llechientu.[4][5]
Reproduzse fácilmente por granes que tienen una alta guañada tipu y pueden permanecer vidables nel suelu mientres siquier siete años. La grana son espulsaes de les cápsules abiertes de forma esplosiva, la dispersión de les granes algama hasta 5 m dende llantar madre, y puede ser esvalixada pel agua y la fauna. Tamién s'arrobina vegetativamente a partir del raigañu, que ye complexa, conozse que llega a 8 metros na tierra y con 5 m d'anchu, y puede tener numberosos biltos.
Hai dos subespecies y un híbridu de les subespecies:[2][4]
Euphorbia esula describióse por Carlos Linneo y espublizóse en Species Plantarum 1: 461. 1753.[6]
Euphorbia: nome xenéricu que remanez del médicu griegu del rei Juba II de Mauritania (52 a 50 e. C. - 23), Euphorbus, nel so honor – o n'alusión al so gran banduyu – yá que usaba médicamente Euphorbia resinifera. En 1753 Carlos Linneo asignó'l nome a tol xéneru.[7]
esula: epítetu llatín que significa ;Citoloxía:
Númberu de cromosomes de Euphorbia esula (Fam. Euphorbiaceae) y táxones infraespecíficos: 2n=20[8]
.
Esta páxina forma parte del wikiproyeutu Botánica, un esfuerciu collaborativu col fin d'ameyorar y organizar tolos conteníos rellacionaos con esti tema. Visita la páxina d'alderique del proyeutu pa collaborar y facer entrugues o suxerencies. Euphorbia esula L., ye una especie fanerógama perteneciente a la familia de les euforbiacees. Ta incluyida na llista 100 de les especies exótiques invasores más dañibles del mundu de la Unión Internacional pal Caltenimientu de la Naturaleza.
Acı südləyən (lat. Euphorbia esula)[1] - südləyənkimilər fəsiləsinin südləyən cinsinə aid bitki növü.[2]
İkiləpəlilər ilə əlaqədar bu məqalə qaralama halındadır. Məqaləni redaktə edərək Vikipediyanı zənginləşdirin. Acı südləyən (lat. Euphorbia esula) - südləyənkimilər fəsiləsinin südləyən cinsinə aid bitki növü.
La lleteresa de séquia o lletrera de séquia (Euphorbia esula) és una espècie de planta de la família euphorbiaceae.
Es troba a moltes zones temperades d'Euràsia. Fora del seu hàbitat normal, està catalogada com a una de les 100 espècies invasores més nocives al món. [1] La lleteresa de séquia es va estendre a l'Amèrica del nord ja a principis del segle XIX on causa molts problemes a les espècies locals. va invadir més de dos millions d'hestàrees de camps de conreu a la gran d'Amèrica del nord.[2] El 2003 els danys econòmics es van estimar a uns 100 milions de dòlars per any.[3] És una amenaça greu per a l'orquídia Platanthera praeclara, un planta en perill d'extinció.
És una planta herbàcia anual hemicriptòfita que creix fins a una alçada d'entre 30 i 80 cm. Les fulles són petites amb forma lanceolada i d'un verd intens. Prenen color verd groguenc a les puntes de les tiges on hi ha les inflorescències. Comparat amb les altres lletereses, el foliatge de la lleteresa de séquia és relativament dens.
La lleteresa de séquia és una planta molt robusta que conserva el seu color verd i dens foliatge malgrat la sequera. Tot i que sembla preferir les vores dels recs i séquies, també hom la troba als recs i llits de riu assecats, així com als erms, prats i camps, on destaca a l'estiu per la seva coloració verda fresca, comparada amb altres plantes o herbes de tons grisencs o ja seques.
El fruit de la lleteresa de séquia és una càpsula esfèrica puntejada que conté unes llavors llises i petites que germinen amb molta facilitat i que mantenen llur viabilitat fins a set anys. La pols de les llavors i arrels es feia servir abans com a laxant.
La lleteresa de séquia és una planta laticífera que produeix una resina blanca o làtex, conegut vulgarment com a «llet», que l'hi ha valgut el seu nom en català. Aquest líquid es coneix amb el nom d'euforbi i conté l'alcaloide euforbina que és tòxic i pot irritar la pell i els ulls severament. Aquesta resina tenia aplicacions en l'antiga medicina casolana contra les berrugues i durícies aplicada directament amb cura, però s'han fet estudis que demostren que pot provocar carcinogènesis de la pell.[4]
A causa de la seva secreció verinosa, la lleteresa de séquia no és menjada pel ramat. Tot i així, hi ha ovelles i cabres que semblen estar immunitzades contra el verí i mengen aquesta planta.[5]
Malgrat el verí qu'exuda la lleteresa de séquia, alguns insectes viuen d'ella, com les erugues del borinot de les lletereses (Hyles euphorbiae), que en mengen les fulles. A Mallorca s'ha observat que l'escarabat Aphthona atrocaerulea (Stephens, 1831) viu sobre la Euphorbia esula i que és freqüent per la primavera.[6]
Té dos subespècies i un híbrid:[7]
La planta es dispersa fàcilment per animals i per aus. Vegetativament pot envair (pels arrels) uns cinc metre per any. El control químic tot sol no té gaire resultats, com la xarxa d'arrels queda intacte i a més també destrueix indiscriminadament plantes i mates útils. Es pot «cansar» la planta per un programa de pastura intens amb ovelles o capres, i en sembrar herbes concurrents. En el control biològic s'utilitzen els Aphthona czwalinae (Weise) and Aphthona lacertosa (Rosenhauer). La Spurgia esulae (Gagné) també pot ajudar. El més eficaç sembla el control integrat (pastura, enemics naturals i només un tractament amb herbicida a l'autumn).[2]
Eixarcolar manualment no és gaire eficaç i ans al contrari pot contribuir a la dispersió de la planta.
La lleteresa de séquia o lletrera de séquia (Euphorbia esula) és una espècie de planta de la família euphorbiaceae.
Planhigyn suddlon tebyg i'r cactws yw Llaethlys deiliog sy'n enw gwrywaidd. Mae'n perthyn i'r teulu Euphorbiaceae. Yr enw gwyddonol (Lladin) yw Euphorbia esula a'r enw Saesneg yw Leafy spurge.[1] Ceir enwau Cymraeg eraill ar y planhigyn hwn gan gynnwys Llaeth Blaidd, Fflamgoed Ganghenddail.
Mae'r dail wedi'u gosod bob yn ail, ac mae'r blodau'n unrhywiol, gyda blodau gwryw a blodau benyw ar yr un planhigyn. Gall fod yn gydryw neu'n deuoecaidd.
Planhigyn suddlon tebyg i'r cactws yw Llaethlys deiliog sy'n enw gwrywaidd. Mae'n perthyn i'r teulu Euphorbiaceae. Yr enw gwyddonol (Lladin) yw Euphorbia esula a'r enw Saesneg yw Leafy spurge. Ceir enwau Cymraeg eraill ar y planhigyn hwn gan gynnwys Llaeth Blaidd, Fflamgoed Ganghenddail.
Mae'r dail wedi'u gosod bob yn ail, ac mae'r blodau'n unrhywiol, gyda blodau gwryw a blodau benyw ar yr un planhigyn. Gall fod yn gydryw neu'n deuoecaidd.
Pryšec obecný (Euphorbia esula) je vytrvalá, až 70 cm vysoká, planě rostoucí rostlina, jeden z více než 25 druhů rodu pryšec které rostou v přírodě České republiky.
Druh roste téměř po celé Evropě a dále na Sibiři, ve Střední Asii, v Číně a Koreji. Druhotně se vyskytuje v Severní a Jižní Americe a také v Tichomoří, tam všude se patrně dostal se znečištěným osivem. V Česku je hojně rozšířený od nížin do podhůří, ve vyšších polohách je naopak vzácný.
Slunomilná rostlina která roste nejčastěji na lehkých, neobdělávaných půdách. Tento hemikryptofyt se vyskytuje hlavně na stráních, loukách i pastvinách, na úhorech, v příkopech podél polních cest, v lužních lesích, na silničních i železničních náspech i na březích vodních nádrží a řek.
Pryšec obecný je vytrvalá, lysá, řídce trsnatá bylina vyrůstající z tenkého rozvětveného oddenku. Oblé přímé lodyhy dorůstající do výše 40 až 70 cm se v úžlabí listů silně větví. Střídavě vyrůstající listy jsou přisedlé, úzce obkopinaté, celokrajné a jen u tupě špičatého vrcholu jemně pilovité. Bývají dlouhé 4 až 6 cm a široké 3 až 6 mm, spodní jsou rozestálé a horní vzpřímené.
Lodyha a její odbočky v horní části lodyhy nesou cyathia tvořící květenství, mnohoramenný lichookolík s 10 až 18 větvemi, které se mohou i dvojnásobně vidličnatě větvit. Špičaté podpůrné listeny jsou podlouhlé trojboké a na vrcholu mají ostrou špičku. Srdčité zákrovní listence jsou široce trojboké až ledvinovité a jsou širší než delší. V období po odkvětu jejich zlatožlutě zbarvení zčervená a žlutavé nektarové žlázky zhnědnou. Rostlina kvete v červnu až srpnu. Plody jsou třípouzdré kulovité tobolky, asi 3 mm velké. Obsahují tři hladká, šedohnědá, okrouhle vejčitá, asi 2 mm dlouhá semena se žlutým masíčkem. Ploidie druhu 2n = 60.
Rostlina se rozšiřuje do svého okolí hlavně dlouhými výhonky oddenků které jsou dobře životaschopné a pronikají hluboko do půdy, rostlina tak kolem sebe vytváří kolonii. Na větší vzdálenosti se šíří semeny která si podržují klíčivost po mnoho let. Semena bývají po dozrání vystřelována pukajícími tobolkami až 4 m daleko a roznášejí je také mravenci.
Rostlina po poranění roní z mléčnic bílé mléko které po potřísnění kůže zapříčiňuje její svědění nebo vznik puchýřů, při zasažení oka vyvolává zánět rohovky a po požití způsobuje zvracení nebo průjmy. Mléko obsahuje kyselinu euforbiovou a její anhydrid, dále euforbon, pryskyřici, kaučuk, gumu a organické kyseliny.
Druh je ve středoevropské přírodě hodnocen jako málo nebezpečný plevel který obvykle roste na neobdělávaných místech. Jen řídce se vyskytuje i na polích kde zapleveluje vytrvalé pícniny, drží se však většinou při okrajích a lze ho úspěšně likvidovat herbicidy.
Na západě Kanady a Spojených států je pryšec obecný považován za velkou hrozbu, je zapsán na seznamu 100 světově nejnebezpečnějších plevelů a každá rostlina je povinně hubena. Pro jeho omezení tam byli zkoušeni i brouci dřepčíci (Alticini) napadající květy.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
Kolonie rostlin
Cyathium
Část květenství
Zrající tobolky
Obrázky, zvuky či videa k tématu pryšec obecný ve Wikimedia Commons
Pryšec obecný (Euphorbia esula) je vytrvalá, až 70 cm vysoká, planě rostoucí rostlina, jeden z více než 25 druhů rodu pryšec které rostou v přírodě České republiky.
Die Esels-Wolfsmilch oder Scharfe Wolfsmilch (Euphorbia esula) ist eine Pflanzenart in der Gattung Wolfsmilch (Euphorbia).
Euphorbia esula ist eine ausdauernde krautige Pflanze, die Wuchshöhen von 30 bis 80 cm erreicht. Sie ist ein Hemikryptophyt und breitet sich über Wurzelsprosse aus. Die Wurzeln reichen tief. Die Stängel sind aufrecht oder aufsteigend.
Die wechselständigen, schmal lanzettlichen Laubblätter sind über der Mitte meist am breitesten und sind zum Grund hin verschmälert. Die Breite beträgt 3 bis 5 (selten 8) mm, die Länge 30 bis 60 mm. Nebenblätter fehlen stets.
Die Endscheindolde ist vielstrahlig. Die Hochblätter sind frei und nicht verwachsen, ihre Farbe ist grün oder gelblich. Die Nektardrüsen sind mondsichelförmig oder zweihörnig. Blütezeit ist Juni bis August. Die Bestäubung erfolgt durch Zweiflügler (Diptera).
Die Kapselfrucht ist fein punktiert und rau. Die Samen sind glatt.
Die Chromosomenzahl beträgt 2n = 60 oder 64; bei der Unterart subsp. tommasiniana auch 2n = 20.[1]
Die Esels-Wolfsmilch ist in Eurasien beheimatet. Sie ist ein submeridionales bis boreales, kontinentales Florenelement. In Mitteleuropa kommt sie zerstreut vor, in den Alpen fehlt sie. In Ost-Österreich ist sie häufig, sonst zerstreut bis selten. In Südtirol nimmt sie stark zu, in Liechtenstein fehlt sie. In der Schweiz ist sie nur aus einem kleinen Gebiet in Graubünden bekannt.[2] In Dänemark ist sie ein Neophyt.
In Nordamerika wurde sie im 19. Jahrhundert eingeführt und wird in manchen Gebieten als invasive Art eingestuft.[3]
Sie wächst in Wiesen, Weiden, auf Äckern, in Gebüschen, an Ufern und auf Ruderalstellen. Sie bevorzugt frische bis mäßig trockene, nährstoffreiche, mehr oder weniger kalkhaltige Böden. Sie steigt bis in die montane Höhenstufe. Sie gedeiht in Gesellschaften der Verbände Agropyro-Rumicion, Mesobromion oder der Ordnung Onopordetalia, kommt aber auch in Gesellschaften der Klasse Trifolio-Geranietea vor.[1]
Folgende Untereinheiten (Varietäten, Unterarten und ihre Hybride) werden anerkannt:[4]
Nicht mehr hierher gehören:[4]
Wie alle Euphorbien besitzt die Esels-Wolfsmilch (lateinisch früher, wie auch andere Wolfsmilcharten als Esula[6] oder speziell als esula minor[7], „Kleine Esula“, bezeichnet) einen giftigen Milchsaft, im Volksmund „Hexenmilch“ genannt. Neben den in der Familie weit verbreiteten Ingenolestern besitzt sie auch Jatrophan-Derivate vom Typ des Esulon A.[8]
Die Esels-Wolfsmilch oder Scharfe Wolfsmilch (Euphorbia esula) ist eine Pflanzenart in der Gattung Wolfsmilch (Euphorbia).
Euphorbia esula (lat. Euphorbia esula L.) është bimë e familjes Euphorbiaceae.
E. esula
Jěre wjelkowe mloko (Euphorbia esula) jo rostlina ze swójźby wjelkomlokowych rostlinow (Euphorbiaceae).
Jěre wjelkowe mloko jo wěcejlětna rostlina, kótarejež kijašk dośěgnjo wusokosć wót 15 až do 30 cm. Łopjena su linealne, w prědnej połojcy nejšyrše a dośěgnu dłujkosć wót 3 až do 6 cm a šyrokosć wót 3 až do 7 mm.
Kwiśo wót maja až do julija. Kwiśonki stoje w wěcejpromjenjowych pózdatnych wokołkach. Załzy njasu dwa róžka.
Rosćo na suchych łukach, drjebiznowych městnach, na rěcnych brjogach, na lědach a na nakłonjach.
Rostlina jo w Europje šyroko rozšyrjona, pśi comž w Nimskej pśedewšym we wjelikich dolinach wjelikich rěkow wustupujo.
Jěre wjelkowe mloko (Euphorbia esula) jo rostlina ze swójźby wjelkomlokowych rostlinow (Euphorbiaceae).
Euphorbia esula, commonly known as green spurge or leafy spurge,[1] is a species of spurge native to central and southern Europe (north to England, the Netherlands, and Germany), and eastward through most of Asia north of the Himalaya to Korea and eastern Siberia.[2][3][4]
It is a herbaceous perennial plant growing to 1-1.2 m tall, with several stems branched from the base. The stems are smooth, hairless, or slightly hairy. The leaves are small, lanceolate, 4-8.5 cm long and up to 1 cm broad, with a slightly wavy margin. The flowers are small, produced in umbels with a basal pair of bright yellow-green petal-like bracts. Clusters of the bracts appear in late spring, while the actual flowers do not develop until early summer. All parts of the plant contain a toxic white milky sap.[4][5]
It reproduces readily like by seeds that have a high germination rate and may remain viable in the soil for at least eight years.[6] The seed capsules open explosively, dispersing seed up to 5 m from the parent plant, and may be carried further by water and wildlife. Leafy spurge also spreads vegetatively from the root system, which is complex, reported to reach 8 m into the ground and 5 m across, and may have numerous buds.[7][8][9]
There are two subspecies and a hybrid subspecies:[2][4]
It has commonly been confused with Euphorbia virgata. E. esula is no longer considered a permanent component of the North American flora.[10] E. esula is restricted to certain parts of Europe and not considered a weedy species, while E. virgata is found throughout the United States and Canada and has caused significant economic and ecological impacts.[10] E. virgata is best distinguished from E. esula by its leaves, which are 6-15 times longer than wide with margins that are (near-)parallel at the middle of the blade, while E. esula leaves are wider toward the tip, usually 3-8 times longer than wide, with margins that are not parallel at the middle of the leaf. In addition, the apex of E. virgata is usually acute and the base is truncate to attenuate, while the apex of E. esula is rounded or subacute and the base is more gradually attenuate or cuneate.[10] Mentions of E. esula in the North American flora and invasive species literature are now referred to E. virgata.
Euphorbia esula, commonly known as green spurge or leafy spurge, is a species of spurge native to central and southern Europe (north to England, the Netherlands, and Germany), and eastward through most of Asia north of the Himalaya to Korea and eastern Siberia.
Euphorbia esula L. es una especie fanerógama perteneciente a la familia de las euforbiáceas. Está incluida en la lista 100 de las especies exóticas invasoras más dañinas del mundo[1] de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza.
Es una especie nativa del centro y sur de Europa (norte de Inglaterra, los Países Bajos y Alemania), y hacia el este a través de la mayor parte de Asia al norte del Himalaya a Corea y Siberia oriental.[2][3][4]
Es una planta herbácea perenne que alcanza los 1-1,2 m de altura, con tallos ramificados desde la base. Los tallos son lisos, peludos o un poco peludo. Las hojas son pequeñas, lanceoladas, de 4-8.5 cm de largo y hasta 1 cm de ancho, con un margen ligeramente ondulado. Las flores son pequeñas, producidas en umbelas con un par basal de color verde-amarillo brillante de pétalos como brácteas. Las agrupaciones de brácteas aparecen al final de la primavera, mientras que las flores reales no se desarrollan hasta principios de verano. Todas las partes de la planta contienen una savia tóxica de color blanco lechoso.[4][5]
Se reproduce fácilmente por semillas que tienen una alta germinación tipo y pueden permanecer viables en el suelo durante al menos siete años. La semilla son expulsadas de las cápsulas abiertas de forma explosiva, la dispersión de las semillas alcanza hasta 5 m desde la planta madre, y puede ser dispersada por el agua y la fauna. También se propaga vegetativamente a partir de la raíz, que es compleja, se conoce que llega a 8 metros en la tierra y con 5 m de ancho, y puede tener numerosos brotes.
Hay dos subespecies y un híbrido de las subespecies:[2][4]
Euphorbia esula fue descrita por Carlos Linneo y publicado en Species Plantarum 1: 461. 1753.[6]
Euphorbia: nombre genérico que deriva del médico griego del rey Juba II de Mauritania (52 a 50 a. C. - 23), Euphorbus, en su honor – o en alusión a su gran vientre – ya que usaba médicamente Euphorbia resinifera. En 1753 Carlos Linneo asignó el nombre a todo el género.[7]
esula: epíteto latino que significa
Número de cromosomas de Euphorbia esula (Fam. Euphorbiaceae) y táxones infraespecíficos: 2n=20[8]
Euphorbia esula L. es una especie fanerógama perteneciente a la familia de las euforbiáceas. Está incluida en la lista 100 de las especies exóticas invasoras más dañinas del mundo de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza.
Kibe piimalill (Euphorbia esula) on piimalilleliste sugukonda piimalille perekonda kuuluv rohttaim.
Looduslikult kasvab kibe piimalill suuremas osas Euraasiast alates Inglismaast kuni Himaalaja, Korea ja Ida-Siberini. Eestis kasvab ta hajusalt.
Taime kõrgus on kuni 1,2 m. Taime aluselt kasvab välja mitu vart. Vars on sile, karvutu või kergelt karvane. Lehed on piklikud, kuni 1 cm laiad ja 4–8,5 cm pikad, sirge või kergelt lainja servaga.
Õied on väikesed ja koondunud sarikasse. Õie all on ere kollakasroheline kandelehtede paar, mis meenutab õielehti. Need kandelehed ilmuvad taimele hiliskevadel, tegelik õitsemine algab alles varasuvel. Taim õitseb juunist septembrini.
Kibe piimalill paljuneb seemnetega, mis on suhteliselt eluvõimelised: külvamise korral on seemne idanemistõenäosus suur. Pinnases võib seeme jääda eluvõimeliseks vähemalt 7 aastaks. Kuprad avanevad plahvatuslikult ja paiskavad seemned kuni 5 m kaugusele emataimest. Seemned võivad edasi kanduda veevooluga, samuti võivad nad loomade karvastiku külge kinni jääda ja sel moel levida. Kibe piimalill suudab paljuneda ka vegetatiivselt: selleks on tal keeruline juurestik, mis võib ulatuda taimest kuni 5 m kaugusele ja 8 m sügavusele.
Taim eritab vigastamisel eritab mürgist valget piimmahla. Seda sisaldavad taime kõik osad ja loomad ei taha teda sellepärast süüa.
Taim kasvab kuivadel niitudel ja teeservadel.
USA-sse viidi kibe piimalill arvatavasti kogemata koos viljaseemnetega 19. sajandi algul. Esimesena täheldati teda Massachusettsis 1827. Ta levis kiiresti ja jõudis juba 80 aastaga Põhja-Dakotasse. Tänapäeval kasvab see enamuses USA põhjaosast. Kõige levinum on ta Dakotas, Montanas, Nebraskas ja Wyomingis. Ameerika Ühendriikide Põllumajandusministeerium on kibeda piimalille tunnistanud invasiivseks liigiks. Kanadas Albertas leiti see esimest korda 1933 ja ta on sisse viidud ka Lõuna-Ameerikasse.
Kibe piimalill kasvab eriti preerias. Ta tõrjub teisi taimi välja mitmel viisil: ta varjutab nende eest päikese, võtab oma tohutu juurestiku abil ära vee ja toitained ning endas leiduvate taimemürkide abil takistab enda läheduses teiste taimede kasvu. Ta võib suured maa-alad üksinda üle võtta.
Ühest juuretükist piisab, et taim uuesti kasvaks, sellepärast on teda raske välja juurida. Taimemürke on tema vastu välja töötatud ja need on ka mõjunud, kui neid kasutada õite ja seemnete arengu ajal juunis või siis septembri alguses, kui taim kogub oma juurtesse toitaineid. Mürgitamisele järgneval kevadel tuleb maapind põlema panna, et piimalill uuesti ei kasvaks, ja niimoodi mitu aastat järjest, sest tema seemned võivad mullas mitu aastat idanemisvõimelisena püsida. Kui kasvõi üks aasta vahele jätta, võib taim uuesti kasvada ja protseduuri tuleb algusest peale korrata. See teeb võitluse kibeda piimalillega väga tülikaks.
Bioloogiline võitlus on andnud paremaid tulemusi. Kõigepealt suudavad kodukitsed nähtavasti süüa kibedaid piimalilli ilma mürgitust saamata ja Idahos kasutatakse neid kergliiklusteede teepervede puhastamiseks kibedaist piimalilledest. USA põllumajandusministeerium on Euroopast sisse toonud ka kibeda piimalille looduslikke vaenlasi, näiteks mitmesuguseid poilasi, mille vastsed ja valmikud toituvad tema juurtest ja vartest. Esimesel aastal ei ole tulemused nii märgatavad kui taimemürkide kasutamisel, aga mõne aastaga, kui putukad paljunevad, on saavutatud muljetavaldavaid tulemusi.
Kibe piimalill (Euphorbia esula) on piimalilleliste sugukonda piimalille perekonda kuuluv rohttaim.
Looduslikult kasvab kibe piimalill suuremas osas Euraasiast alates Inglismaast kuni Himaalaja, Korea ja Ida-Siberini. Eestis kasvab ta hajusalt.
Taime kõrgus on kuni 1,2 m. Taime aluselt kasvab välja mitu vart. Vars on sile, karvutu või kergelt karvane. Lehed on piklikud, kuni 1 cm laiad ja 4–8,5 cm pikad, sirge või kergelt lainja servaga.
Õied on väikesed ja koondunud sarikasse. Õie all on ere kollakasroheline kandelehtede paar, mis meenutab õielehti. Need kandelehed ilmuvad taimele hiliskevadel, tegelik õitsemine algab alles varasuvel. Taim õitseb juunist septembrini.
Kibe piimalill paljuneb seemnetega, mis on suhteliselt eluvõimelised: külvamise korral on seemne idanemistõenäosus suur. Pinnases võib seeme jääda eluvõimeliseks vähemalt 7 aastaks. Kuprad avanevad plahvatuslikult ja paiskavad seemned kuni 5 m kaugusele emataimest. Seemned võivad edasi kanduda veevooluga, samuti võivad nad loomade karvastiku külge kinni jääda ja sel moel levida. Kibe piimalill suudab paljuneda ka vegetatiivselt: selleks on tal keeruline juurestik, mis võib ulatuda taimest kuni 5 m kaugusele ja 8 m sügavusele.
Taim eritab vigastamisel eritab mürgist valget piimmahla. Seda sisaldavad taime kõik osad ja loomad ei taha teda sellepärast süüa.
Taim kasvab kuivadel niitudel ja teeservadel.
Kenttätyräkki (Euphorbia esula, synonyymi Euphorbia virgata) on monivuotinen, juurakollinen, ruohovartinen tyräkkikasvi. Laji on myrkyllinen kuten muutkin tyräkit.[1]
Juurakosta nousee pystyjä, joskus haarovia varsia. Suomessa varret ovat yleensä korkeintaan puolen metrin korkuisia. Varressa on runsaasti ruodittomia, pitkänomaisia, alle senttimetrin levyisiä, ehytlaitaisia lehtiä. Varret ja lehdet ovat kellanvihreitä ja kaljuja. Varren latvaan muodostuu sarjamainen kukinto, jossa on kuudesta yhdeksään haaraa. Latvakukinnon lisäksi alemmas varteen kasvaa usein pienempiä kukintohaaroja. Kukintohaarojen tyvellä on varsilehtiä leveämpiä ja keltaisempia, tyveltään herttamaisia tukilehtiä. Kukintohaarojen kärkeen muodostuu tyräkeille ominainen valekukka (cyathium). Siinä on alinna kaksi leveää, lähes puoliympyrän muotoista, kellertävää ylälehteä, niiden keskellä neljä mesiäislevyä, useita hyvin pieniä, kehättömiä, yksiheteisiä hedekukkia ja keskimmäisenä vihreä emikukka. Kenttätyräkillä mesiäislevyt ovat puolikuun muotoiset, ja niiden kärjissä on ulospäin suuntautuvat sarvimaiset ulokkeet. Mesiäislevyt ovat aluksi kellanvihreät, mutta muuttuvat vähitellen ruskeiksi. Emikukka sisältää vain kukkaperän päässä nuokkuvan emiön, jonka pallomaisesta sikiäimestä muodostuu pyöreähkö, kolmilohkoinen kotahedelmä. Kukinnan edistyessä jokaisen valekukan tyveltä kasvaa yleensä kaksi sivuhaaraa, joihin muodostuu samanlaiset valekukat.[1][2] Kenttätyräkki voi risteytyä tarhatyräkin (Euphorbia cyparissias) kanssa.
Kenttätyräkin alkuperäinen esiintymisalue on ehkä sijainnut alueella, joka ulottuu itäisestä Keski-Euroopasta Kaspianmeren pohjoispuolitse Altaille. Siellä se esiintyy luontaisesti pensaikkoisilla aroilla ja joen rantojen hietikkojen kuivemmissa osissa. Nykyisin se on levinnyt lähes koko Eurooppaan, mutta on harvinaisempi kylmimmillä alueilla pohjoisessa, mereisimmillä rannikkoseuduilla lännessä ja välimerenkasvillisuuden alueella etelässä. Levinneisyysalue ulottuu hajanaisena läpi Siperian Koreaan ja Japaniin asti. Pohjois-Amerikassa kenttätyräkki on levinnyt 1800-luvun alun jälkeen läpi koko mantereen Yhdysvaltain pohjoisosassa ja Kanadan eteläosassa.[2][3] Voimakkaan leviämisensä takia laji on luokiteltu yhdeksi sadasta haitallisimmasta vieraslajista.[4]
Suomessa kenttätyräkki on vakiintunut, mutta ei kovin yleinen uustulokas. Ensimmäiset havainnot siitä eri puolilla Etelä-Suomea ovat 1800-luvun jälkipuoliskolta. Se kasvaa yleensä hiekkaperäisillä paikoilla ja melko avoimessa ympäristössä kuten ahoilla, pientareilla ja ratapenkereillä. Yleisin se on kaakossa, Savossa ja Karjalassa, ja harvinaisin Suomenselän länsipuolella. Pohjanmaalla esiintyminen painottuu satamakaupunkien ympäristöön. Pohjoisimmat havainnot ovat Rovaniemellä ja Kainuussa. Itä-Suomeen se on ilmeisesti levinnyt Venäjältä tuodun huonosti puhdistetun siemenviljan mukana, ja toisaalta kaskiviljely loi siellä sille sopivia kasvupaikkoja vielä 1800-luvulla. Muuten sen varhainen leviäminen Suomessa näyttää liittyneen rautateihin ja satamiin.[1][2][5]
Kenttätyräkki (Euphorbia esula, synonyymi Euphorbia virgata) on monivuotinen, juurakollinen, ruohovartinen tyräkkikasvi. Laji on myrkyllinen kuten muutkin tyräkit.
L'euphorbe ésule[1] ou euphorbe âcre (Euphorbia esula) est une espèce de plantes herbacées de la famille des Euphorbiaceae.
C'est une plante herbacée érigée, de taille moyenne, à tige lisse. Les bractées florales sont jaune acide. Plusieurs tiges partent généralement de la racine pivotante qui s'enfonce très profondément dans le sol.
La reproduction se fait par les graines, qui ont un fort taux de germination et peuvent rester vivantes dans le sol pendant au moins sept ans. Les capsules s'ouvrent en explosant, dispersant les graines jusqu'à 5 m autour du pied-mère. La dissémination peut se faire par voie aquatique ou animale. L'euphorbe se multiplie aussi de façon végétative et s'étend ainsi de plusieurs mètres par an.
Le système racinaire est complexe, peut atteindre 8 m de profondeur et s'étendre sur 5 m en largeur. Les racines peuvent porter de nombreux rejets.
Données d'après : Julve, Ph., 1998 ff. - Baseflor. Index botanique, écologique et chorologique de la flore de France. Version : 23 avril 2004.
Si cette espèce peut montrer un comportement invasif en Amérique du Nord, ce n'est pas le cas dans son aire d'origine. En France notamment, elle est peu répandue, protégée en Basse Normandie et inscrite en Liste Rouge UICN en Bretagne par exemple.
L'euphorbe ésule est une espèce invasive en Amérique du Nord. Originaire d'Europe et d'Asie, elle a été exportée vers l'Amérique vers le début du XIXe siècle, sans doute via des lots de semences agricoles.
La plante entre en compétition avec les plantes indigènes en accaparant l'eau et les nutriments, en produisant de l'ombre et en générant des toxines qui inhibent la croissance des autres plantes autour d'elle.
En Amérique du Nord, elle peut former des colonies très vastes dans les prairies, posant de sérieux problèmes pour la biodiversité, notamment dans les parcs nationaux.
Elle pose aussi localement des problèmes en Europe, par exemple dans les prairies inondables du Val de Saône (en France) où elle menace une quinzaine de plantes protégées. L'Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage (ONCFS) français y a prescrit avec d'autres une lutte chimique, en attendant de trouver des moyens de lutte biologique[2].
Du fait de la persistance des graines et de sa capacité à se régénérer à partir de petits fragments de racines, elle est très difficile à éradiquer. Des programmes de lutte biologique sont mis en place, en important des ravageurs européens. Il existe également des herbicides systémiques.
L'euphorbe ésule ou euphorbe âcre (Euphorbia esula) est une espèce de plantes herbacées de la famille des Euphorbiaceae.
A leiterena frondosa (Euphorbia esula) é unha especie de Euphorbia, nativa[1][2] dos Azores, sur e centro de Europa, incluíndo Galicia[3], e gran parte de Asia: Oriente Medio, Cáucaso, Siberia oriental, China, Corea... Tamén está presente como especie naturalizada no Canadá, os Estados Unidos, México, Dinarmaca, Noruega e o Reino Unido.[4]
É unha planta perenne herbácea que medra ata 1-1,2 metros de altura, con talo ramificado desde a base, os talos son lisos ou lixeira ou completamente, pilosos. As follas son pequenas, lanceoladas de entre 4 e 8,5 cm de longo e 1 cm de largo, cun bordo lixeiramente ondulado. As flores son pequenas, producidas en umbelas cun par basal de brácteas semellantes a pétalos de cor amarelo verdoso brillante. Os acios de brácteas aparecen a fins da primavera, mentres as flores reais non se desenvolven ata o principio do verán. Todas as partes da planta conteñen o látex, líquido leitoso tóxico.[4][5]
Reprodúcese por sementes que teñen unha taxa alta de xerminación e que poden seguir sendo viables no terreo cando menos durante sete anos. As cápsulas da semente abren explosivamente, esparexendo a semente ata cinco metros da planta de orixe, e por medio da auga ou da fauna poden chegar moito máis lonxe. Tamén pode propagarse vexetativamente desde a raíz, que é complexa, chegando a se introducir ata 8 metros dentro da terra e cun largo de 5, e cpode ter numerosos abrochos.[6]
Existen dúas subespecies e un híbrido:[1][4]
Chegou a América do Norte a comezos do século XIX desde Europa dentro de lotes de sementes agrícolas, entrando en competencia coas plantas indíxenas en especial nas praderías, acaparando a auga e os nutrimentos, e producindo toxinas que impiden o crecemento doutras plantas ao seu arredor. Por esta razón está identificada como unha herba danosa en varios parques nacionais e en reservas naturais de once estados e clasificada como especie invasiva polo Departamento de Agricultra dos Estados Unidos.[6][7] En Europa tamén é danosa localmente, así nas zonas praderías inundables do Val de Saône é unha ameaza para unha quincena de plantas protexidas [8].
Pola súa natureza persistente a a súa capacidade de se rexenerar a partir de pequenos fragmentos das súas raíces, é moi difícil de erradicar, existindo programas de control biolóxico [9]. tamén se empregan varios herbicidas sistemáticos.
A leiterena frondosa (Euphorbia esula) é unha especie de Euphorbia, nativa dos Azores, sur e centro de Europa, incluíndo Galicia, e gran parte de Asia: Oriente Medio, Cáucaso, Siberia oriental, China, Corea... Tamén está presente como especie naturalizada no Canadá, os Estados Unidos, México, Dinarmaca, Noruega e o Reino Unido.
Jěra mlóčeń (Euphorbia esula) je rostlina ze swójby mlóčenjowych rostlinow (Euphorbiaceae).
Jěra mlóčeń je wjacelětna rostlina, kotrejež stołpik docpěje wysokosć wot 15 hač do 30 cm. Łopjena su linealne, w prědnjej połojcy najšěrše a docpěja dołhosć wot 3 hač do 6 cm a šěrokosć wot 3 hač do 7 mm.
Kćěje wot meje hač do julija. Kćenja steja w wjacepromjenjowych pozdatnych wokołkach. Žałzy njesu dwaj róžkaj.
Rosće na suchich łukach, drjebiznowych městnach, na rěčnych brjohach, na ladach a na skłoninach.
Rostlina je w Europje šěroko rozšěrjena, při čimž w Němskej předewšěm we wulkich dolinach wulkich rěkow wustupuje.
Jěra mlóčeń (Euphorbia esula) je rostlina ze swójby mlóčenjowych rostlinow (Euphorbiaceae).
Heksenmelk (Euphorbia esula) is een blijvende plant uit de wolfsmelkfamilie (Euphorbiaceae). De plant komt in heel Europa en grote stukken van Azië voor en heeft een voorliefde voor laaggelegen gebieden. In de Verenigde Staten wordt heksenmelk, dat door Europeanen op de prairies werd geïntroduceerd, ervaren als een plaag.
De plant heeft een stevige, vertakte wortelstok waaraan diverse stengeltjes met langwerpige bladeren verschijnen. Hij kan een hoogte bereiken van 30 tot 60 cm. De smal-lancetvormige bladeren zijn 3 - (8) mm breed en 30 – 60 mm lang.
De bloeitijd strekt zich uit van mei tot eind augustus. De planten hebben schijnbloemen, cyathia genaamd (enkelvoud cyathium), die omgeven zijn door geelgroene schutbladen (involucrum). Een cyathium bestaat uit een kopjesvormige bodem, gevormd door twee kelkbladen. Daarbinnen bevindt zich één vrouwelijke bloem, omringd door meerdere mannelijke bloemen die gereduceerd zijn tot één meeldraad. Een aantal honingklieren omgeeft dit geheel.
De vruchten zijn groene, gladde, explosieve driekluizige kluisvruchten met één zaad per kluis.
Heksenmelk (Euphorbia esula) is een blijvende plant uit de wolfsmelkfamilie (Euphorbiaceae). De plant komt in heel Europa en grote stukken van Azië voor en heeft een voorliefde voor laaggelegen gebieden. In de Verenigde Staten wordt heksenmelk, dat door Europeanen op de prairies werd geïntroduceerd, ervaren als een plaag.
De plant heeft een stevige, vertakte wortelstok waaraan diverse stengeltjes met langwerpige bladeren verschijnen. Hij kan een hoogte bereiken van 30 tot 60 cm. De smal-lancetvormige bladeren zijn 3 - (8) mm breed en 30 – 60 mm lang.
De bloeitijd strekt zich uit van mei tot eind augustus. De planten hebben schijnbloemen, cyathia genaamd (enkelvoud cyathium), die omgeven zijn door geelgroene schutbladen (involucrum). Een cyathium bestaat uit een kopjesvormige bodem, gevormd door twee kelkbladen. Daarbinnen bevindt zich één vrouwelijke bloem, omringd door meerdere mannelijke bloemen die gereduceerd zijn tot één meeldraad. Een aantal honingklieren omgeeft dit geheel.
De vruchten zijn groene, gladde, explosieve driekluizige kluisvruchten met één zaad per kluis.
Wilczomlecz lancetowaty (Euphorbia esula L.) – gatunek należący do rodziny wilczomleczowatych. Występuje w stanie dzikim w Europie, Azji Mniejszej, Azji zachodniej. Zawleczony do Ameryki Północnej. W Polsce pospolity na niżu i w niższych piętrach górskich.
Bylina, hemikryptofit. Siedlisko: zbocza, nasypy kolejowe, przydroża, ciepłe siedliska ruderalne. Roślina trująca, zawiera trujący sok mleczny. Liczba chromosomów 2n = 60,64[2] .
Występuje w 3 podgatunkach[3]:
Często tworzy też mieszańce z innymi gatunkami[2].
Wilczomlecz lancetowaty (Euphorbia esula L.) – gatunek należący do rodziny wilczomleczowatych. Występuje w stanie dzikim w Europie, Azji Mniejszej, Azji zachodniej. Zawleczony do Ameryki Północnej. W Polsce pospolity na niżu i w niższych piętrach górskich.
Euphorbia esula é uma espécie de planta com flor pertencente à família Euphorbiaceae.
A autoridade científica da espécie é L., tendo sido publicada em Species Plantarum 1: 461. 1753.[1]
Trata-se de uma espécie presente no território português, nomeadamente os seguintes táxones infraespecíficos:[2]
Euphorbia esula é uma espécie de planta com flor pertencente à família Euphorbiaceae.
A autoridade científica da espécie é L., tendo sido publicada em Species Plantarum 1: 461. 1753.
Vargtörel (Euphorbia esula) är en växtart i familjen törelväxter.
Wikimedia Commons har media som rör Vargtörel.
Vargtörel (Euphorbia esula) är en växtart i familjen törelväxter.
Euphorbia esula là một loài thực vật có hoa trong họ Đại kích. Loài này được Carl von Linné mô tả khoa học đầu tiên năm 1753.[1]
.jpg)
Phương tiện liên quan tới Euphorbia esula tại Wikimedia Commons
.jpg){kind=small}
Bài viết về tông Đại kích này vẫn còn sơ khai. Bạn có thể giúp Wikipedia bằng cách mở rộng nội dung để bài được hoàn chỉnh hơn. Euphorbia esula là một loài thực vật có hoa trong họ Đại kích. Loài này được Carl von Linné mô tả khoa học đầu tiên năm 1753.
Euphorbia esula L., (1753)
Молоча́й о́стрый (лат. Euphórbia ésula) ― травянистое многолетнее растение; вид рода Молочай семейства Молочайные (Euphorbiaceae).
Растения 30—80 см высотой, голые или иногда опушённые, сизоватые.
Корень ползучий, тонкоцилиндрический, ветвистый, с длинными отпрысками. Корневая система распространяется от основания растения на глубину до 8 м и вдоль поверхности почвы до 5 м, давая при этом многочисленные побеги[2].
Стебли прямостоячие, круглые, полосчатые, голые, наверху с 1—23 тонкими, часто изогнутыми, пазушными цветоносами 1,5—7,5 см длиной, ниже с густо олиственными, впоследствии удлиняющимися нецветущими ветвями.
Низовые листья сухо-плёнчатые, чешуевидные, стеблевые сидячие или едва черешчатые, из постепенно сужающегося основания узко-обратно-ланцетовидные, 2—7 см длиной, наиболее широкие в верхней трети, 2—8(13) мм шириной (длина большей частью в 7—12 раз превышает ширину), тупые или часто от едва выступающей срединной жилки коротко-остроконечные, цельнокрайние, со слегка изогнутым, иногда густо-волнистым краем, листья у верхушки часто зазубренные, мягкие, последствие торчащие, голые, сверху тускло-зелёные, снизу голубоватые, нижние горизонтально отстоящие или даже вниз отогнутые, нередко на коротких черешках, верхние вверх направленные, на нецветущих ветвях 7—20 мм длиной и 2—2,5 мм шириной.
Верхушечные цветоносы в числе (6)8—13(14), 1,5—6 см длиной, как и пазушные — простые или на конце один или два раза двураздельные. Листочки обёртки линейно-ланцетовидные или продолговато-яйцевидные, лишь изредка вполне подобные стеблевым листьям, 1—3 см длиной, 1,5—3,5 мм шириной (длина в 3—9 раз превышает ширину), заострённые; листочки обёрточек по два, из усечённого или широко-яйцевидного основания ромбически-яйцевидные или треугольно-почковидные (ширина больше длины чаще всего в 1½ раза, редко больше — до 2 раз, нижние 5—9 мм длиной и 8—17 мм шириной), коротко заострённые; бокальчик колокольчатый, 2—2,5 мм длиной и в диаметре, с короткими, усечёнными, бахромчатыми лопастями. Нектарники жёлтые или зелёные, впоследствии буреющие, коротко-двурогие, часто почти безрогие. Столбики 1―1,5 мм длиной, внизу примерно на 1⁄6 длины сросшиеся, наверху на 1⁄3 рассечённые.
Плод — яйцевидный трёхорешник, 2,5—3,5 мм длиной, 2,8—3,8 мм шириной, глубоко-трёхбороздчатый, голый, с округлёнными, на спинке слегка морщинисто-бугорчатыми лопастями. Семена 2―2,3 мм длиной, 1,8 мм шириной, яйцевидные, жёлто-бурые, гладкие, с хорошо заметной жёлтой, почковидной карункулой. Семена высокой всхожести и сохраняют жизнеспособность в почве до семи лет. Семенные коробочки лопаются, и семена разбрасываются на расстояние до 5 м от самого растения, в дикой природе они могут далее разносится водой[2].
Вид описан из Западной Европы (Германия, Бельгия, Франция).
Встречается в Европе: Дания, Финляндия, Австрия, Бельгия, Чехословакия, Германия, Венгрия, Польша, Швейцария, Болгария, Югославия, Италия, Румыния, Франция (включая Корсику), Португалия, Испания; на территории бывшего СССР: Белоруссия, Эстония, Латвия, Литва, Молдавия, Европейская часть России, Украина (включая Крым), Кавказ (Армения, Азербайджан, Грузия, Предкавказье, Дагестан), Западная Сибирь, Восточная Сибирь (Бурятия, окрестности Иркутска, Красноярска), Средняя Азия (Казахстан, Киргизия, Таджикистан, Туркмения, Узбекистан); в большей части Азии: Афганистан, Иран, Ирак, Турция, Монголия, Китай, Корея; в Северной Америке (как заносное): США, Канада; Южной Америке (как заносное): юг и на Гавайских островах (как заносное)[3][4][5].
Растёт на лугах, в светлых лесах, по галечным и песчаным берегам рек, по обочинам дорог и в посевах, особенно на суглинистой почве.
В Предкавказье, Поволжье и Казахстане является одним из засорителей посевов[6].
Молочай острый был завезён в Соединённые Штаты Америки, возможно с семенами других растений, в начале XIX века. Впервые зарегистрирован в Массачусетсе в 1827 году. Острый молочай быстро распространился и достиг Северной Дакоты в течение приблизительно 80 лет. Сейчас распространён на большей северной части США. Чаще всего встречается в Монтане, Северной Дакоте, Небраске, Южной Дакоте и Вайоминге. Считается злостным сорняком в одиннадцати северных штатах. Министерством сельского хозяйства США отнесён к агрессивным растениям[2][7]. Был также завезён в Канаду и в Южную Америку.[3].
Молочай острый вытесняет все растения, обитающие в прериях и полях, затеняя их и забирая влагу и питательные вещества, а также выделяя токсины, угнетающие рост других растений[2].
Из-за своих жизнестойких способностей и возможности вырасти из самого маленького участка корня, молочай острый необычайно трудно уничтожить. Биологические меры борьбы предусматривают очень перспективную тактику для борьбы с этим сорняком. В Айдахо для этого использовались козы, которые щиплют острый молочай без всякого вреда для себя[8]. Министерство сельского хозяйства США доказало успешность использования в борьбе с молочаем острым шести европейских видов насекомых, включающих сверлящего отверстия в его корнях жука Oberea erythrocephala и четырёх поедающих корни жуков рода Aphthona семейства листоедов, а также мошку Spurgia esulae[2].
В наземной части содержатся кумарины, флавоноиды: кверцетин, рутин, гиперин и кверцимеритрин[9].
Молочай лозный даёт зелёную краску[10].
Молочай двуцветный и Гмелина на Алтае считается хорошим кормом для кроликов[9].
Молочай острый находит применение в народной медицине при лечении доброкачественных и злокачественных новообразований. Мазь из корней молочая острого применяют при наружных опухолях. Млечным соком растения наружно удаляют бородавки и мозоли, а в смеси с серой лечат лейшманиозы и чесотки. Спиртовой экстракт травы имеет антилейкемическую активность[11].
В Монголии в народной медицине корень молочая двуцветного «Алаг суут увс» употребляется как слабительное средство при различных болезнях. Народные лекари отмечали, что такие заболевания как эхинококк печени, кисту и венерическую болезнь можно вылечить этим растением[9].
В Западной Сибири молочай двуцветный используется внутрь при самых разнообразных заболеваниях: как кровоочистительное, при воспалении лёгких, опухолях, язвенной болезни, как тонизирующее, при тяжёлых общих заболеваниях, приписывая ему действие, подобное женьшеню, но считается предпочтительным для удаления бородавок и мозолей[9].
В Германии корень молочая острого употребляется в качестве слабительного средства[6].
Есть два подвида и один гибридный вид[3][5]:
Молоча́й о́стрый (лат. Euphórbia ésula) ― травянистое многолетнее растение; вид рода Молочай семейства Молочайные (Euphorbiaceae).
乳浆大戟（学名：Euphorbia esula）是大戟科大戟属的植物。分布在欧亚大陆、西欧、北美以及中国大陆的分布于全国等地，生长于海拔50米至2,000米的地区，多生长于沙丘、山坡、路旁、河沟边、杂草丛、荒山、林下及草地，目前已由人工引种栽培。國際自然保護聯盟物種存續委員會的入侵物種專家小組（ISSG）列為世界百大外來入侵種。
猫眼草，烂疤眼（俗称），华北大戟（秦岭植物志），新疆大戟（中国沙漠植物志），太鲁阁大戟（台湾植物志），岷县大戟（云南植物志），东北大戟，松叶乳汁大戟，宽叶乳浆大戟（东北草本植物志），乳浆草（北京植物志）
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_sl9.jpg)
_sl15.jpg)
