Myriapods

Figure 1.Size comparison of the left gonopod (posterior view), of six Boreohesperus species: A Boreohesperus capensis Shear, 1992 B Boreohesperus curiosus sp. n. C Boreohesperus delicatus sp. n. D Boreohesperus dubitalis sp. n. E Boreohesperus furcosus sp. n. F Boreohesperus undulatus sp. n. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Figure 7.Posterior gonopod views. A Agathodesmus bonang sp. n., paratype ex series NMV K-11861-11869 B Agathodesmus carorum sp. n., NMV K-11884 C Agathodesmus chandleri sp. n., paratype ex series SAM OM-2004-2018 D Agathodesmus hahnensis sp. n., paratype ex QM S38962. B is uncoated specimen; scale bars: A, B, C = 0.1 mm, D = 0.2 mm.

Figure 11.Gonatodesmus communicans sp. n., ♂ paratype; A, D, G anterior part of body, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively B, E, H midbody segments, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively C, F, I posterior part of body, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively J cross-section of a midbody segment, caudal view K head, ventral view L, M poriferous midbody paratergite, tergal setae, tegument structure, limbus and stricture region N ozopore region of segment 16, subdorsal view. Scale bars: A–D, F–J 0.1 mm; E, K 0.05 mm; N 0.02 mm; L, M 0.01 mm.

Figure 9.Tylopus nodulipes (Attems, 1953), ♂ lectotype; A, B left gonopod, mesal and lateral views, respectively C leg of segment 10, depicted not to scale.

All Biocode files are based on field identifications to the best of the researcher’s ability at the time.

All Biocode files are based on field identifications to the best of the researcher’s ability at the time.

Hobro, Jylland, Danmark

Asker, Akershus, Norge

Meilgård Skov

Lille Vildmose

Meilgård Skov

Hevring Hede

Buderupholm Bjergskov, Rold Skov, Jylland, Danmark

Figure 12.Orthomorpha picturata sp. n., ♂ holotype. A, B right gonopod, lateral and mesal views, respectively. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Figure 3.Left ventrolateral views of gonopods of Prosopodesmus species. A Prosopodesmus crater sp. n., paratype, ANIC 64–000212. B Prosopodesmus kirrama sp. n., paratype, QM S91627. Tip of left gonopod telopodite of Prosopodesmus crater is broken. Scale bars = 0.2 mm. Image contrast is low because specimens are uncoated.

Figure 4.Left lateral views of posterior end of holotype. A Asticopyrgodesmus maiala sp. n. B Asticopyrgodesmus lamingtonensis sp. n. C Nephopyrgodesmus eungella sp. n. D Notopyrgodesmus kulla sp. n. E Notopyrgodesmus lanosus sp. n. F Notopyrgodesmus weiri sp. n. Images not to same scale.

Figure 2.Boreohesperus capensis Shear, 1992. A–B Male (WAM T44397) habitus: A lateral view B dorsal view C–F Male (WAM T44397) left gonopod: C posterior view D anterior view E medial view F lateral view. bs solenomere base C coxa F femur NSB non-seminiferous branch PF prefemur S solenomere. Scale bars: A–B = 2 mm; C–F = 0.5 mm.

Figure 1.Localities for Agathodesmus spp. in Australia (filled black squares) as of July 2012. 1 = only known locality for Agathodesmus anici sp. n. 2 = cluster of 4 localities for Agathodesmus chandleri sp. n., ? = questionable Cammoo Caves locality for Agathodesmus agnus sp. n.; see Figs 11-13 for other species. Geographic projection, 5° latitude-longitude grid. NSW = New South Wales, NT = Northern Territory, QLD = Queensland, SA = South Australia, TAS = Tasmania, VIC = Victoria, WA = Western Australia.

Figure 12.Gonatodesmus communicans sp. n., ♂ paratype; A antennomeres 4-8, dorsal view B tarsus 1, ventral view C midbody leg, lateral view D both gonopods in situ, ventral view E–G left gonopod, anteroventral, ventral and submesal views, respectively. Scale bars: A, C 0.05 mm; D–G 0.02 mm; B 0.01 mm. Designations of gonopod structures in text.

Figure 8.Tylopus nodulipes (Attems, 1953), ♂ lectotype; A, B anterior part of body, dorsal and lateral views, respectively C segments 10 and 11, dorsal view D segments 9–11, lateral view E–G posterior part of body, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively H, I sternal cones between coxae 4, caudal and lateral views, respectively.

All Biocode files are based on field identifications to the best of the researcher’s ability at the time.

Asker, Akershus, Norge

Lille Vildmose

Meilgård Skov